| Literature DB >> 25651423 |
Alessandra Tedeschi1, Paola Picardi1, Simone Ferrero2, Giulia Benevolo3, Gloria Margiotta Casaluci4, Marzia Varettoni5, Claudia Baratè6, Marina Motta7, Guido Gini8, Maria Cecilia Goldaniga9, Carlo Visco10, Francesco Zaja11, Valeria Belsito Petrizi12, Erika Ravelli13, Massimo Gentile14, Marina Aurora Urbano2, Silvia Franceschetti4, Paola Ghione2, Lorella Orsucci3, Anna Maria Frustaci1, Gianluca Gaidano4, Umberto Vitolo3, Enrica Morra1.
Abstract
According to the European Society for Medical Oncology and National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines on Waldenström macroglobulinemia, bendamustine (B) may be considered a suitable therapeutic option. To address the role of B in combination with rituximab (BR), we analyzed the outcome of 71 patients with relapsed/refractory disease, median age 72 years, treated with R 375 mg/m(2) day 1 and B days 1 and 2 (dosage ranging from 50 to 90 mg/m(2)). Patients had previously received a median number of 2 lines of treatment (range 1-5). Overall and major response rates were 80.2% and 74.6%. Major toxicity was grade 3/4 neutropenia occurring in 13% of courses. There was no significant association between baseline features or patients' characteristics and response achievement. Median progression-free survival was not reached after a median follow-up of 19 months (range 3-54). None of the patients developed aggressive lymphoma or secondary myelodysplastic syndrome/acute myeloid leukemia. BR was found to be an active and well-tolerated salvage regimen leading to rapid disease control.Entities:
Keywords: Bendamustine; Waldenström macroglobulinemia; refractory; relapsed; rituximab; salvage
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 25651423 DOI: 10.3109/10428194.2015.1012714
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Leuk Lymphoma ISSN: 1026-8022