Literature DB >> 25651292

The comparative evaluation of treatment outcomes in pediatric displaced supracondylar humerus fractures managed with either open or closed reduction and percutaneous pinning.

D Keskin1, H Sen.   

Abstract

PURPOSE OF THE STUDY: The aim of this study was to evaluate comparatively the outcomes of pediatric displaced supracondylar fractures of humerus which were treated with either closed reduction and percutaneous pinning (CRPP) or open reduction and percutaneous pinning (ORPP).
MATERIAL AND METHODS: The study included 100 children with displaced supracondylar fractures of the humerus, who were treated with either CRPP (group 1) or ORPP (group 2); the numbers of subjects in the study groups were equal. The treatment outcomes were assessed clinically and radiologically.
RESULTS: Ninety-six percent excellent or good cosmetic results were achieved in both groups, and 94% / 90% excellent or good functional results were achieved in groups 1 and 2 (respectively). There was no signifiant difference between Baumann and humero-capitellar angles of intact and operated sides in both groups, but there was an average carrying angle difference of 2,96 degrees in the group 1 and 1,52 degrees in the group 2 and these differences were statistically signifiant. Five cases (10%) from each group had superfiial pin tract infection. Hypertrophic incision scar occurred in 6 (12%) patients performed ORPP.
CONCLUSION: Both CRPP and ORPP are successful treatment methods in the management of non-complicated and non-comminuted displaced supracondylar fractures of the humerus in pediatric ages and their outcomes are similar. Incision scar and the long duration of operation are the disadvantages of open surgery. For fiing the fracture, placement of two K-wires from the medial and lateral aspects which cross each other is enough to achieve a good stability. In ORPP practices, lateral incision is a simple and reliable approach despite of the dissatisfying scar tissue formation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25651292

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech        ISSN: 0001-5415            Impact factor:   0.531


  4 in total

Review 1.  Interventions for treating supracondylar elbow fractures in children.

Authors:  Ben A Marson; Adeel Ikram; Simon Craxford; Sharon R Lewis; Kathryn R Price; Benjamin J Ollivere
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2022-06-09

Review 2.  A systematic review and meta-analysis of two different managements for supracondylar humeral fractures in children.

Authors:  Xue-Ning Zhang; Jian-Ping Yang; Zhi Wang; Yang Qi; Xiang-Hong Meng
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2018-06-07       Impact factor: 2.359

3.  Do fluoroscopic and radiographic images underestimate pin protrusion in paediatric supracondylar humerus and distal radius fractures? A synthetic bone model analysis.

Authors:  S Kenney; J Schlechter
Journal:  J Child Orthop       Date:  2019-02-01       Impact factor: 1.548

4.  The outcome of loose bone fragments in pediatric supracondylar humerus fractures: a retrospective study.

Authors:  Lei Yang; Panyi Yang; Lang Li; Xueyang Tang
Journal:  J Pediatr Orthop B       Date:  2022-01-01       Impact factor: 1.473

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.