Literature DB >> 25650328

Domestic pigs' (Sus scrofa domestica) use of direct and indirect visual and auditory cues in an object choice task.

Christian Nawroth1, Eberhard von Borell.   

Abstract

Recently, foraging strategies have been linked to the ability to use indirect visual information. More selective feeders should express a higher aversion against losses compared to non-selective feeders and should therefore be more prone to avoid empty food locations. To extend these findings, in this study, we present a series of studies investigating the use of direct and indirect visual and auditory information by an omnivorous but selective feeder-the domestic pig. Subjects had to choose between two buckets, with only one containing a reward. Before making a choice, the subjects in Experiment 1 (N = 8) received full information regarding both the baited and non-baited location, either in a visual or auditory domain. In this experiment, the subjects were able to use visual but not auditory cues to infer the location of the reward spontaneously. Additionally, four individuals learned to use auditory cues after a period of training. In Experiment 2 (N = 8), the pigs were given different amounts of visual information about the content of the buckets-lifting either both of the buckets (full information), the baited bucket (direct information), the empty bucket (indirect information) or no bucket at all (no information). The subjects as a group were able to use direct and indirect visual cues. However, over the course of the experiment, the performance dropped to chance level when indirect information was provided. A final experiment (N = 3) provided preliminary results for pigs' use of indirect auditory information to infer the location of a reward. We conclude that pigs at a very young age are able to make decisions based on indirect information in the visual domain, whereas their performance in the use of indirect auditory information warrants further investigation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25650328     DOI: 10.1007/s10071-015-0842-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anim Cogn        ISSN: 1435-9448            Impact factor:   3.084


  5 in total

1.  Exclusion in the field: wild brown skuas find hidden food in the absence of visual information.

Authors:  Samara Danel; Jules Chiffard-Carricaburu; Francesco Bonadonna; Anna P Nesterova
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2021-02-16       Impact factor: 3.084

2.  Giraffes go for more: a quantity discrimination study in giraffes (Giraffa camelopardalis).

Authors:  Montserrat Colell; Federica Amici; Alvaro L Caicoya; Ruben Holland; Conrad Ensenyat
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2020-10-30       Impact factor: 3.084

3.  Piglets Learn to Use Combined Human-Given Visual and Auditory Signals to Find a Hidden Reward in an Object Choice Task.

Authors:  Sandy Bensoussan; Maude Cornil; Marie-Christine Meunier-Salaün; Céline Tallet
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-10-28       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 4.  Farm Animal Cognition-Linking Behavior, Welfare and Ethics.

Authors:  Christian Nawroth; Jan Langbein; Marjorie Coulon; Vivian Gabor; Susann Oesterwind; Judith Benz-Schwarzburg; Eberhard von Borell
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2019-02-12

5.  Feasibility of pooled oral fluid collection from pre-weaning piglets using cotton ropes.

Authors:  Gwenaël Boulbria; Valérie Normand; Mily Leblanc-Maridor; Catherine Belloc; Pauline Berton; Franck Bouchet; Arnaud Lebret
Journal:  Vet Anim Sci       Date:  2020-02-13
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.