Literature DB >> 25650306

Alternatives to the use of antimicrobial agents in pig production: A multi-country expert-ranking of perceived effectiveness, feasibility and return on investment.

Merel Postma1, Katharina D C Stärk2, Marie Sjölund3, Annette Backhans3, Elisabeth Grosse Beilage4, Svenja Lösken4, Catherine Belloc5, Lucie Collineau2, Denise Iten6, Vivianne Visschers6, Elisabeth O Nielsen7, Jeroen Dewulf8.   

Abstract

Nineteen alternatives to antimicrobial agents were ranked on perceived effectiveness, feasibility and return on investment (ROI) from 0 (not effective, not feasible, no ROI) to 10 (fully effective, completely feasible, maximum ROI) by 111 pig health experts from Belgium, Denmark, France, Germany, Sweden and Switzerland. The top 5 measures in terms of perceived effectiveness were (1) improved internal biosecurity, (2) improved external biosecurity, (3) improved climate/environmental conditions, (4) high health/Specific Pathogen Free/disease eradication and (5) increased vaccination. The top 5 measures in terms of perceived feasibility were (1) increased vaccination, (2) increased use of anti-inflammatory products, (3) improved water quality, (4) feed quality/optimization and (5) use of zinc/metals. The top 5 measures in terms of perceived ROI were (1) improved internal biosecurity, (2) zinc/metals, (3) diagnostics/action plan, (4) feed quality/optimization and (5) climate/environmental improvements. Univariate linear regression showed that veterinary practitioners rank internal biosecurity, vaccination, use of zinc/metals, feed quality optimization and climate/environmental on average highest, while researchers and professors focused more on increased use of diagnostics and action plans. Financial incentives/penalties ranked low in all countries. Belgian respondents ranked feed quality significantly lower compared to the German respondents while reduction of stocking density was ranked higher in Belgium compared to Denmark. Categorical Principal Component Analysis applied to the average ranking supported the finding that veterinary practitioners had a preference for more practical, common and already known alternatives. The results showed that improvements in biosecurity, increased use of vaccination, use of zinc/metals, feed quality improvement and regular diagnostic testing combined with a clear action plan were perceived to be the most promising alternatives to antimicrobials in industrial pig production based on combined effectiveness, feasibility and ROI.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Alternatives to antimicrobial agents; Biosecurity; Diagnostics and action plan; Financial incentives; Management; Pig production; Vaccination; Water and feed quality; Zinc oxide

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25650306     DOI: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2015.01.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prev Vet Med        ISSN: 0167-5877            Impact factor:   2.670


  24 in total

Review 1.  Invited review: strategic adoption of antibiotic-free pork production: the importance of a holistic approach.

Authors:  John F Patience; Alejandro Ramirez
Journal:  Transl Anim Sci       Date:  2022-05-16

2.  The effects of pharmacological levels of zinc, diet acidification, and dietary crude protein on growth performance in nursery pigs.

Authors:  Wade M Hutchens; Mike D Tokach; Steve S Dritz; Jordan Gebhardt; Jason C Woodworth; Joel M DeRouchey; Robert D Goodband; Hilda I Calderon
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2021-10-01       Impact factor: 3.338

3.  No Clear Effect of Initiating Vaccination against Common Endemic Infections on the Amounts of Prescribed Antimicrobials for Danish Weaner and Finishing Pigs during 2007-2013.

Authors:  Amanda Brinch Kruse; Leonardo Víctor de Knegt; Liza Rosenbaum Nielsen; Lis Alban
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2017-01-16

Review 4.  Post weaning diarrhea in pigs: risk factors and non-colistin-based control strategies.

Authors:  Mohamed Rhouma; John Morris Fairbrother; Francis Beaudry; Ann Letellier
Journal:  Acta Vet Scand       Date:  2017-05-19       Impact factor: 1.695

5.  Evaluation of the relationship between the biosecurity status, production parameters, herd characteristics and antimicrobial usage in farrow-to-finish pig production in four EU countries.

Authors:  Merel Postma; Annette Backhans; Lucie Collineau; Svenja Loesken; Marie Sjölund; Catherine Belloc; Ulf Emanuelson; Elisabeth Grosse Beilage; Elisabeth Okholm Nielsen; Katharina D C Stärk; Jeroen Dewulf
Journal:  Porcine Health Manag       Date:  2016-05-01

6.  Understanding the culture of antimicrobial prescribing in agriculture: a qualitative study of UK pig veterinary surgeons.

Authors:  L A Coyne; S M Latham; N J Williams; S Dawson; I J Donald; R B Pearson; R F Smith; G L Pinchbeck
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  2016-08-11       Impact factor: 5.790

7.  Learning Processes and Trajectories for the Reduction of Antibiotic Use in Pig Farming: A Qualitative Approach.

Authors:  Nicolas Fortané; Florence Bonnet-Beaugrand; Anne Hémonic; Carole Samedi; Arnaud Savy; Catherine Belloc
Journal:  Antibiotics (Basel)       Date:  2015-10-22

8.  Veterinary Expert Opinion on Potential Drivers and Opportunities for Changing Antimicrobial Usage Practices in Livestock in Denmark, Portugal, and Switzerland.

Authors:  Luís P Carmo; Liza R Nielsen; Lis Alban; Paulo M da Costa; Gertraud Schüpbach-Regula; Ioannis Magouras
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2018-03-01

9.  Evaluation of antibiotic usage in swine reproduction farms in Umbria region based on the quantitative analysis of antimicrobial consumption.

Authors:  Fausto Scoppetta; Marco Sensi; Maria Pia Franciosini; Marinella Capuccella
Journal:  Ital J Food Saf       Date:  2017-09-28

10.  2018 Survey of factors associated with antimicrobial drug use and stewardship practices in adult cows on conventional California dairies: immediate post-Senate Bill 27 impact.

Authors:  Pius S Ekong; Essam M Abdelfattah; Emmanuel Okello; Deniece R Williams; Terry W Lehenbauer; Betsy M Karle; Joan D Rowe; Sharif S Aly
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2021-07-13       Impact factor: 2.984

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.