| Literature DB >> 25649937 |
Magdy Elsayed Mahfouz1, Nabila Mira, Said Amer.
Abstract
In this study, we examined the prevalence and molecular characteristics of Cryptosporidium in buffalo, dairy cattle and sheep in different farms at Kafr El Sheikh Province, Egypt. Rectal fecal samples, including 466 samples from buffalo, 1697 from cattle and 120 from sheep, were collected from different ages and screened by modified Ziehl-Neelsen acid-fast microscopy for detection of Cryptosporidium oocysts. All studied farms were positives with an overall prevalence of 1.29% in buffalo (4.17% in claves versus 0.48% in adults), 7.07% in cattle (6.90% in calves versus 10.20% and 6.10% in heifers and adults, respectively) and 2.50% in sheep (4.40% in lambs versus 1.30% in adults). PCR-RFLP analyses of small-subunit rRNA genes from positive specimens revealed the occurrence of C. parvum and C. ryanae in buffalo; C. parvum, C. ryanae, C. bovis and C. andersoni in cattle and only C. xiaoi in sheep. Genotypes distribution showed that C. ryanae was the dominant species (60.0%) followed by C. parvum (40.0%) in buffalo calves. Meanwhile, in cattle calves, C. parvum was the commonest species (74.23%) followed by C. ryanae (16.10%) and C. bovis (9.70%). Subtyping of C. parvum based on sequence analysis of the polymorphic 60 kDa glycoprotein gene locus showed the presence of subtypes IIdA20G1 and IIaA15G1R1 in both buffalo and cattle calves, addressing the potential role of calves in zoonotic cryptosporidiosis in Egypt.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2014 PMID: 25649937 PMCID: PMC4300370 DOI: 10.1292/jvms.14-0272
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Vet Med Sci ISSN: 0916-7250 Impact factor: 1.267
Infection rates of Cryptosporidium in different age groups of buffalo, cattle and sheep in Kafr El Sheikh Province, Egypt, based on acid fast staining-microscopy
| Farm Name | Farm animals | Neonates | Heifers | Adults | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sample size | No. positive | Infection rate (%) | Sample size | No. positive | Infection rate (%) | Sample size | No. positive | Infection rate (%) | ||
| Farm A | Cattle | 154 | 4 | 2.60 | 125 | 2 | 1.60 | 370 | 2 | 0.54 |
| Farm B | Cattle | 159 | 16 | 10.10 | 123 | 13 | 10.60 | 318 | 21 | 6.60 |
| Farm C | Cattle | 137 | 11 | 8.0 | 75 | 18 | 24.0 | 236 | 33 | 14.0 |
| Farm D | Buffalo | 57 | 1 | 1.80 | 89 | 0 | 0.0 | 116 | 0 | 0.0 |
| Farm E | Buffalo | 63 | 4 | 6.40 | 50 | 0 | 0.0 | 91 | 1 | 1.10 |
| Farm C | Sheep | 45 | 2 | 4.40 | - | - | - | 75 | 1 | 1.30 |
Fig. 1.Phylogenetic relationship of Cryptosporidium spp. based on sequences of the partial SSU rRNA gene. Evolutionary relationships of 43 taxa were inferred using the Neighbor-Joining method [39] with the coccidian Eimeria tenella (AF026388) as an out-group. Numbers at the internodes correspond to percent bootstrap values from 2,000 replicates. Egyptian isolates are bolded.
Distribution of Cryptosporidium spp. in different age groups of buffalo, cattle and sheep in Kafr El Sheikh Province, Egypt, based on PCR-RFLP patterns of SSU rRNA gene fragment
| Farm Name | Neonates | Heifers | Adults | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Farm A | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Farm B | 11 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 13 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 20 |
| Farm C | 9 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 18 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 32 |
| Farm D | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Farm E | 1 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Farm C | 2 specimens of | — | — | one specimen of | ||||||||