Literature DB >> 25648882

On the high frequency transfer of mechanical stimuli from the surface of the head to the macular neuroepithelium of the mouse.

Timothy A Jones1, Choongheon Lee, G Christopher Gaines, J W Wally Grant.   

Abstract

Vestibular macular sensors are activated by a shearing motion between the otoconial membrane and underlying receptor epithelium. Shearing motion and sensory activation in response to an externally induced head motion do not occur instantaneously. The mechanically reactive elastic and inertial properties of the intervening tissue introduce temporal constraints on the transfer of the stimulus to sensors. Treating the otoconial sensory apparatus as an overdamped second-order mechanical system, we measured the governing long time constant (Τ(L)) for stimulus transfer from the head surface to epithelium. This provided the basis to estimate the corresponding upper cutoff for the frequency response curve for mouse otoconial organs. A velocity step excitation was used as the forcing function. Hypothetically, the onset of the mechanical response to a step excitation follows an exponential rise having the form Vel(shear) = U(1-e(-t/TL)), where U is the applied shearing velocity step amplitude. The response time of the otoconial apparatus was estimated based on the activation threshold of macular neural responses to step stimuli having durations between 0.1 and 2.0 ms. Twenty adult C57BL/6 J mice were evaluated. Animals were anesthetized. The head was secured to a shaker platform using a non-invasive head clip or implanted skull screws. The shaker was driven to produce a theoretical forcing step velocity excitation at the otoconial organ. Vestibular sensory evoked potentials (VsEPs) were recorded to measure the threshold for macular neural activation. The duration of the applied step motion was reduced systematically from 2 to 0.1 ms and response threshold determined for each duration (nine durations). Hypothetically, the threshold of activation will increase according to the decrease in velocity transfer occurring at shorter step durations. The relationship between neural threshold and stimulus step duration was characterized. Activation threshold increased exponentially as velocity step duration decreased below 1.0 ms. The time constants associated with the exponential curve were Τ(L) = 0.50 ms for the head clip coupling and T(L) = 0.79 ms for skull screw preparation. These corresponded to upper -3 dB frequency cutoff points of approximately 318 and 201 Hz, respectively. T(L) ranged from 224 to 379 across individual animals using the head clip coupling. The findings were consistent with a second-order mass-spring mechanical system. Threshold data were also fitted to underdamped models post hoc. The underdamped fits suggested natural resonance frequencies on the order of 278 to 448 Hz as well as the idea that macular systems in mammals are less damped than generally acknowledged. Although estimated indirectly, it is argued that these time constants reflect largely if not entirely the mechanics of transfer to the sensory apparatus. The estimated governing time constant of 0.50 ms for composite data predicts high frequency cutoffs of at least 318 Hz for the intact otoconial apparatus of the mouse.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25648882      PMCID: PMC4368654          DOI: 10.1007/s10162-014-0501-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol        ISSN: 1438-7573


  24 in total

1.  Stimulus and recording variables and their effects on mammalian vestibular evoked potentials.

Authors:  Sherri M Jones; Geetha Subramanian; Wilma Avniel; Yuqing Guo; Robert F Burkard; Timothy A Jones
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2002-07-30       Impact factor: 2.390

2.  Experimental measurement of utricle dynamic response.

Authors:  M D Dunlap; C E Spoon; J W Grant
Journal:  J Vestib Res       Date:  2012-01-01       Impact factor: 2.435

3.  Experimental measurement of utricle system dynamic response to inertial stimulus.

Authors:  M D Dunlap; J W Grant
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2014-05-21

4.  Response to static tilts of peripheral neurons innervating otolith organs of the squirrel monkey.

Authors:  C Fernandez; J M Goldberg; W K Abend
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1972-11       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Nystagmus and oscillopsia.

Authors:  A Straube; A Bronstein; D Straumann
Journal:  Eur J Neurol       Date:  2011-09-12       Impact factor: 6.089

6.  Physiology of peripheral neurons innervating otolith organs of the squirrel monkey. III. Response dynamics.

Authors:  C Fernández; J M Goldberg
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1976-09       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Physiology of peripheral neurons innervating otolith organs of the squirrel monkey. I. Response to static tilts and to long-duration centrifugal force.

Authors:  C Fernández; J M Goldberg
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1976-09       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  Physiology of peripheral neurons innervating otolith organs of the squirrel monkey. II. Directional selectivity and force-response relations.

Authors:  C Fernández; J M Goldberg
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1976-09       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  Gravity receptor function in mice with graded otoconial deficiencies.

Authors:  Sherri M Jones; Lawrence C Erway; Kenneth R Johnson; Heping Yu; Timothy A Jones
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 3.208

Review 10.  Vision and vertigo: some visual aspects of vestibular disorders.

Authors:  Adolfo M Bronstein
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 4.849

View more
  12 in total

1.  Rescue of peripheral vestibular function in Usher syndrome mice using a splice-switching antisense oligonucleotide.

Authors:  Sarath Vijayakumar; Frederic F Depreux; Francine M Jodelka; Jennifer J Lentz; Frank Rigo; Timothy A Jones; Michelle L Hastings
Journal:  Hum Mol Genet       Date:  2017-09-15       Impact factor: 6.150

Review 2.  Multiscale modeling of mechanotransduction in the utricle.

Authors:  Jong-Hoon Nam; J W Grant; M H Rowe; E H Peterson
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2019-04-17       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 3.  The new vestibular stimuli: sound and vibration-anatomical, physiological and clinical evidence.

Authors:  Ian S Curthoys
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2017-01-27       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Effects of Ketamine Compared with Urethane Anesthesia on Vestibular Sensory Evoked Potentials and Systemic Physiology in Mice.

Authors:  Choongheon Lee; Timothy A Jones
Journal:  J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci       Date:  2018-05-01       Impact factor: 1.232

5.  Effect of M-current modulation on mammalian vestibular responses to transient head motion.

Authors:  Choongheon Lee; J Chris Holt; Timothy A Jones
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-08-30       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Differential effects of Cdh23(753A) on auditory and vestibular functional aging in C57BL/6J mice.

Authors:  Bruce E Mock; Sarath Vijayakumar; Jessica Pierce; Timothy A Jones; Sherri M Jones
Journal:  Neurobiol Aging       Date:  2016-03-26       Impact factor: 4.673

7.  Nicotinic acetylcholine receptors regulate vestibular afferent gain and activation timing.

Authors:  Barbara J Morley; Anna Lysakowski; Sarath Vijayakumar; Deanna Menapace; Timothy A Jones
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  2016-11-21       Impact factor: 3.215

8.  Effects of Several Therapeutic Agents on Mammalian Vestibular Function: Meclizine, Diazepam, and JNJ7777120.

Authors:  Choongheon Lee; Timothy A Jones
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2021-05-19

9.  Retinoic acid synthesis and autoregulation mediate zonal patterning of vestibular organs and inner ear morphogenesis.

Authors:  Kazuya Ono; Lisa L Sandell; Paul A Trainor; Doris K Wu
Journal:  Development       Date:  2020-08-07       Impact factor: 6.862

Review 10.  Electrophysiological Measurements of Peripheral Vestibular Function-A Review of Electrovestibulography.

Authors:  Daniel J Brown; Christopher J Pastras; Ian S Curthoys
Journal:  Front Syst Neurosci       Date:  2017-05-31
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.