Literature DB >> 25648645

Does legal physician-assisted dying impede development of palliative care? The Belgian and Benelux experience.

Kenneth Chambaere1, Jan L Bernheim1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In 2002, physician-assisted dying was legally regulated in the Netherlands and Belgium, followed in 2009 by Luxembourg. An internationally frequently expressed concern is that such legislation could stunt the development of palliative care (PC) and erode its culture. To study this, we describe changes in PC development 2005-2012 in the permissive Benelux countries and compare them with non-permissive countries.
METHODS: Focusing on the seven European countries with the highest development of PC, which include the three euthanasia-permissive and four non-permissive countries, we compared the structural service indicators for 2005 and 2012 from successive editions of the European Atlas of Palliative Care. As an indicator for output delivery of services to patients, we collected the amounts of governmental funding of PC 2002-2011 in Belgium, the only country where we could find these data.
RESULTS: The rate of increase in the number of structural PC provisions among the compared countries was the highest in the Netherlands and Luxembourg, while Belgium stayed on a par with the UK, the benchmark country. Belgian government expenditure for PC doubled between 2002 and 2011. Basic PC expanded much more than endowment-restricted specialised PC.
CONCLUSIONS: The hypothesis that legal regulation of physician-assisted dying slows development of PC is not supported by the Benelux experience. On the contrary, regulation appears to have promoted the expansion of PC. Continued monitoring of both permissive and non-permissive countries, preferably also including indicators of quantity and quality of delivered care, is needed to evaluate longer-term effects. Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Euthanasia; Palliative Care

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25648645     DOI: 10.1136/medethics-2014-102116

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Ethics        ISSN: 0306-6800            Impact factor:   2.903


  5 in total

Review 1.  Euthanasia: Global Scenario and Its Status in India.

Authors:  Raghvendra Singh Shekhawat; Tanuj Kanchan; Puneet Setia; Alok Atreya; Kewal Krishan
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2017-07-19       Impact factor: 3.525

2.  Involvement of palliative care in euthanasia practice in a context of legalized euthanasia: A population-based mortality follow-back study.

Authors:  Sigrid Dierickx; Luc Deliens; Joachim Cohen; Kenneth Chambaere
Journal:  Palliat Med       Date:  2017-08-29       Impact factor: 4.762

3.  Understanding why patients request euthanasia when it is illegal: a qualitative study in palliative care units on the personal and practical impact of euthanasia requests.

Authors:  Danièle Leboul; Anne Bousquet; Aline Chassagne; Florence Mathieu-Nicot; Ashley Ridley; Elodie Cretin; Frédéric Guirimand; Régis Aubry
Journal:  Palliat Care Soc Pract       Date:  2022-01-10

4.  Is progress being made on Canada's palliative care framework and action plan? A survey of stakeholder perspectives.

Authors:  Barbara Pesut; Sally Thorne; Anne Huisken; David Kenneth Wright; Kenneth Chambaere; Carol Tishelman; Sunita Ghosh
Journal:  BMC Palliat Care       Date:  2022-10-14       Impact factor: 3.113

5.  Coverage and development of specialist palliative care services across the World Health Organization European Region (2005-2012): Results from a European Association for Palliative Care Task Force survey of 53 Countries.

Authors:  Carlos Centeno; Thomas Lynch; Eduardo Garralda; José Miguel Carrasco; Francisco Guillen-Grima; David Clark
Journal:  Palliat Med       Date:  2015-07-31       Impact factor: 4.762

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.