Literature DB >> 25648639

Spatiotemporal prediction of fine particulate matter during the 2008 northern California wildfires using machine learning.

Colleen E Reid1, Michael Jerrett1,2, Maya L Petersen3,4, Gabriele G Pfister5, Philip E Morefield6, Ira B Tager3, Sean M Raffuse7, John R Balmes1,8.   

Abstract

Estimating population exposure to particulate matter during wildfires can be difficult because of insufficient monitoring data to capture the spatiotemporal variability of smoke plumes. Chemical transport models (CTMs) and satellite retrievals provide spatiotemporal data that may be useful in predicting PM2.5 during wildfires. We estimated PM2.5 concentrations during the 2008 northern California wildfires using 10-fold cross-validation (CV) to select an optimal prediction model from a set of 11 statistical algorithms and 29 predictor variables. The variables included CTM output, three measures of satellite aerosol optical depth, distance to the nearest fires, meteorological data, and land use, traffic, spatial location, and temporal characteristics. The generalized boosting model (GBM) with 29 predictor variables had the lowest CV root mean squared error and a CV-R2 of 0.803. The most important predictor variable was the Geostationary Operational Environmental Satellite Aerosol/Smoke Product (GASP) Aerosol Optical Depth (AOD), followed by the CTM output and distance to the nearest fire cluster. Parsimonious models with various combinations of fewer variables also predicted PM2.5 well. Using machine learning algorithms to combine spatiotemporal data from satellites and CTMs can reliably predict PM2.5 concentrations during a major wildfire event.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25648639     DOI: 10.1021/es505846r

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Sci Technol        ISSN: 0013-936X            Impact factor:   9.028


  24 in total

1.  Correcting Measurement Error in Satellite Aerosol Optical Depth with Machine Learning for Modeling PM2.5 in the Northeastern USA.

Authors:  Allan C Just; Margherita M De Carli; Alexandra Shtein; Michael Dorman; Alexei Lyapustin; Itai Kloog
Journal:  Remote Sens (Basel)       Date:  2018-05-22       Impact factor: 4.848

2.  A Bayesian ensemble approach to combine PM2.5 estimates from statistical models using satellite imagery and numerical model simulation.

Authors:  Nancy L Murray; Heather A Holmes; Yang Liu; Howard H Chang
Journal:  Environ Res       Date:  2019-07-25       Impact factor: 6.498

Review 3.  Wildfire and prescribed burning impacts on air quality in the United States.

Authors:  Daniel A Jaffe; Susan M O'Neill; Narasimhan K Larkin; Amara L Holder; David L Peterson; Jessica E Halofsky; Ana G Rappold
Journal:  J Air Waste Manag Assoc       Date:  2020-06       Impact factor: 2.235

4.  A comparison of statistical and machine learning methods for creating national daily maps of ambient PM2.5 concentration.

Authors:  Veronica J Berrocal; Yawen Guan; Amanda Muyskens; Haoyu Wang; Brian J Reich; James A Mulholland; Howard H Chang
Journal:  Atmos Environ (1994)       Date:  2019-11-14       Impact factor: 4.798

5.  Methods, availability, and applications of PM2.5 exposure estimates derived from ground measurements, satellite, and atmospheric models.

Authors:  Minghui Diao; Tracey Holloway; Seohyun Choi; Susan M O'Neill; Mohammad Z Al-Hamdan; Aaron Van Donkelaar; Randall V Martin; Xiaomeng Jin; Arlene M Fiore; Daven K Henze; Forrest Lacey; Patrick L Kinney; Frank Freedman; Narasimhan K Larkin; Yufei Zou; James T Kelly; Ambarish Vaidyanathan
Journal:  J Air Waste Manag Assoc       Date:  2019-10-15       Impact factor: 2.235

6.  Combining Land-Use Regression and Chemical Transport Modeling in a Spatiotemporal Geostatistical Model for Ozone and PM2.5.

Authors:  Meng Wang; Paul D Sampson; Jianlin Hu; Michael Kleeman; Joshua P Keller; Casey Olives; Adam A Szpiro; Sverre Vedal; Joel D Kaufman
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2016-04-26       Impact factor: 9.028

7.  Estimating ground-level PM2.5 concentrations by developing and optimizing machine learning and statistical models using 3 km MODIS AODs: case study of Tehran, Iran.

Authors:  Saeed Sotoudeheian; Mohammad Arhami
Journal:  J Environ Health Sci Eng       Date:  2021-02-02

8.  Associations of wildfire smoke PM2.5 exposure with cardiorespiratory events in Colorado 2011-2014.

Authors:  Jennifer D Stowell; Guannan Geng; Eri Saikawa; Howard H Chang; Joshua Fu; Cheng-En Yang; Qingzhao Zhu; Yang Liu; Matthew J Strickland
Journal:  Environ Int       Date:  2019-09-11       Impact factor: 9.621

9.  Combing machine learning and elemental profiling for geographical authentication of Chinese Geographical Indication (GI) rice.

Authors:  Fei Xu; Fanzhou Kong; Hong Peng; Shuofei Dong; Weiyu Gao; Guangtao Zhang
Journal:  NPJ Sci Food       Date:  2021-07-08

10.  Estimating the Acute Health Impacts of Fire-Originated PM2.5 Exposure During the 2017 California Wildfires: Sensitivity to Choices of Inputs.

Authors:  Stephanie E Cleland; Marc L Serre; Ana G Rappold; J Jason West
Journal:  Geohealth       Date:  2021-07-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.