| Literature DB >> 25648523 |
Sebahattin Celik1, E Murat Yılmaz2, Ferhat Özden3, Cetin Kotan1, Hayrettin Okut4.
Abstract
Purpose. To examine the relationship between esophageal and gastric cancers commonly seen in Van Lake region and the traditional eating habits of the geography. Materials and Methods. Esophageal and gastric cancer cases, who underwent surgery between January 1, 2012, and December 31, 2013, were examined. Pathology reports of the patients and presence of Helicobacter pylori (HP) were recorded. Surveys were filled by face to face meeting or telephone call. Control group was created with randomly selected individuals without any cancer diagnosis having age, gender, and socioeconomic characteristics similar to patient group. All data were analyzed using SAS.9.3 statistical programme. Results. Compared with the control group, herby cheese consumption (a component of eating habits) and smoking were significantly higher in the patient group (P < 0.001). Tandoor exposure is compared in terms of female gender, and significant difference was found between the groups (P = 0.0013). As a result of the analysis with logistic regression more than 150 gr of herby cheese consumption per day was found to increase the cancer risk (odds ratio 1.017; 95% CI: 1.012-1.022). Conclusion. A high consumption of herby cheese, cooking bread on tandoor, and heavy smoking were seen to be important risk factors for esophageal and gastric cancers.Entities:
Year: 2015 PMID: 25648523 PMCID: PMC4310488 DOI: 10.1155/2015/254823
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Cancer Epidemiol ISSN: 1687-8558
Age and sex distribution of the patient and control groups.
| Patient group | Control group |
| |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Male | Female | Male | Female | ||
|
| 57 | 56 | 50 | 50 | |
| Age | |||||
| (Mean ± Std. dev.)* | 59.1 ± 10.8 | 59.64 ± 11.1 | 57.82 ± 12.3 | 60.9 ± 11 | 0.984 |
| (Min–Max)** | (32–83) | (34–83) | (27–80) | (38–83) | |
*Mean age and standard deviation.
**Minimum and maximum ages.
Comparison between patient and control groups in terms of herby cheese and tea consumption.
| Patient group | Control group |
| |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mean (%95-CI)* | Mean (%95-CI)* | ||
| Amount of Herby cheese (gram/day) | 238.05 (217.85–258.26) | 85.00 (68.71–101.29) | <0.001 |
| Tea (cc/day) | 929.38 (841.49–1017.28) | 1045.70 (966.04–1125.36) | 0.055 |
*Mean and 95% confidence interval.
Figure 1Comparison between the patient and control groups in terms of smoking (a), tandoor exposure (b), and herby cheese consumption per meal (c).
Figure 2Logistic regression-ROC curve for herby cheese consumption.
Figure 3Sex distribution according to tumor localization.
The distribution of tumor stage and localization according to sex in patient group.
| Stage | Total | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Stage 0 | Stage 1a | Stage 1b | Stage 2a | Stage 2b | Stage 3a | Stage 3b | Stage 3c | Stage 4 | ||||
| Male | Esophagus | 0 (%0) | 0 (%0) | 1 (%8.3) | 3 (%25) | 3 (%25) | 1 (%8.3) | 1 (%8.3) | 0 (%0) | 3 (%25) | 12 (%100) |
|
| Cardia | 0 (%0) | 1 (%3.6) | 0 (%0) | 1 (%3.6) | 9 (%32.1) | 4 (%14.3) | 5 (%17.9) | 3 (%10.7) | 5 (%17.9) | 28 (%100) | ||
| Corpus | 0 (%0) | 1 (%16.7) | 0 (%0) | 0 (%0) | 2 (%33.3) | 0 (%0) | 0 (%0) | 0 (%0) | 3 (%50) | 6 (%100) | ||
| Antrum | 0 (%0) | 0 (%0) | 1 (%9.1) | 0 (%0) | 4 (%36.4) | 2 (%18.2) | 2 (%18.2) | 0 (%0) | 2 (%18.2) | 11 (%100) | ||
|
| ||||||||||||
| Female | Esophagus | 1 (%4) | 1 (%4) | 5 (%20) | 9 (%36) | 4 (%16) | 1 (%4) | 2 (%8) | 0 (%0) | 2 (%8) | 25 (%100) |
|
| Cardia | 0 (%0) | 0 (%0) | 0 (%0) | 1 (%6.7) | 6 (%40) | 2 (%13.3) | 3 (%20) | 1 (%6.7) | 2 (%13.3) | 15 (%100) | ||
| Corpus | 0 (%0) | 0 (%0) | 1 (%16.7) | 1 (%16.7) | 1 (%16.7) | 0 (%0) | 2 (%33.3) | 0 (%0) | 1 (%16.7) | 6 (%100) | ||
| Antrum | 0 (%0) | 0 (%0) | 2 (%20) | 1 (%10) | 0 (%0) | 2 (%20) | 1 (%10) | 2 (%20) | 2 (%20) | 10 (%100) | ||
*No relationship was found between tumor stage and localization of males and females when interpreted separately.
Figure 4Herby cheese and tea consumption according to tumor localization.
Figure 5The distribution of smoking, tandoor exposure, and herby cheese consumption per meal according to tumor localization.
Figure 6The distribution of H. pylori status according to localization of tumor and histopathologic type.