Literature DB >> 25648281

Recovery of corneal sensitivity after collagen crosslinking with and without epithelial debridement in eyes with keratoconus.

Leopoldo Spadea1, Serena Salvatore2, Maria Pia Paroli2, Enzo Maria Vingolo2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the changes in corneal sensitivity after corneal collagen crosslinking (CXL) with the epithelium off (epi-off) and with the epithelium on (epi-on) in eyes with keratoconus.
DESIGN: Prospective interventional case series.
SETTING: Eye Clinic, A. Fiorini Hospital, Terracina (Latina), Rome, Italy.
METHODS: On the basis of the corneal pachymetry at the area of topographic steepening, eyes treated with CXL were divided in 2 groups: those with a corneal thickness of 400 μm or more (epi-off) and those with a corneal thickness of less than 400 μm (epi-on). Corneal sensitivity was measured using a contact esthesiometer (Cochet-Bonnet) before treatment and 1 and 7 days and 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months after treatment.
RESULTS: The study evaluated 50 CXL-treated eyes in 50 patients (25 epi-on and 25 epi-off) from January 7, 2012, to December 15, 2012. In the epi-off group, corneal sensitivity was statistically significantly reduced for up to 3 months after CXL and gradually returned to normal levels. In the epi-on group, corneal sensitivity was statistically significantly reduced for up to 7 days but was not statistically significantly different from preoperative values at other measurement times. At 7 days, the corneal sensitivity was statistically significantly lower in the epi-off eyes than in the epi-on eyes.
CONCLUSIONS: Epi-off and epi-on CXL both caused hypoesthesia, but corneal sensitivity subsequently recovered completely. The corneal hypoesthesia was more pronounced in eyes in which the epi-off technique was used, and the recovery time was shorter for eyes treated using epi-on CXL. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE: No author has a financial or proprietary interest in any material or method mentioned.
Copyright © 2015 ASCRS and ESCRS. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25648281     DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2014.06.030

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg        ISSN: 0886-3350            Impact factor:   3.351


  7 in total

Review 1.  Current perspectives on corneal collagen crosslinking (CXL).

Authors:  Sandeepani K Subasinghe; Kelechi C Ogbuehi; George J Dias
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-04-06       Impact factor: 3.117

Review 2.  In Vivo Confocal Microscopy of Corneal Nerves in Health and Disease.

Authors:  Andrea Cruzat; Yureeda Qazi; Pedram Hamrah
Journal:  Ocul Surf       Date:  2016-10-19       Impact factor: 5.033

3.  Transepithelial versus epithelium-off corneal crosslinking for progressive keratoconus.

Authors:  Sueko M Ng; Mark Ren; Kristina B Lindsley; Barbara S Hawkins; Irene C Kuo
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2021-03-23

4.  Under-the-Flap Crosslinking and LASIK in Early Ectasia with Hyperopic Refractive Error.

Authors:  Sylvain El-Khoury; Youssef Abdelmassih; Mazen Amro; Elias Chelala; Elias Jarade
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-11-15       Impact factor: 1.909

5.  Brillouin microscopic depth-dependent analysis of corneal crosslinking performed over or under the LASIK flap.

Authors:  Hongyuan Zhang; Mehdi Roozbahani; Andre L Piccinini; Farhad Hafezi; Giuliano Scarcelli; J Bradley Randleman
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2020-11       Impact factor: 3.528

Review 6.  Corneal stromal demarcation line after collagen cross-linking in corneal ectatic diseases: a review of the literature.

Authors:  Leopoldo Spadea; Emanuele Tonti; Enzo Maria Vingolo
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-09-19

Review 7.  Biomechanics of Ophthalmic Crosslinking.

Authors:  Brecken J Blackburn; Andrew M Rollins; William J Dupps
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2021-04-29       Impact factor: 3.283

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.