Literature DB >> 25647338

Visual information shapes the dynamics of corticobasal ganglia pathways during response selection and inhibition.

Sara Jahfari1, Lourens Waldorp2, K Richard Ridderinkhof2, H Steven Scholte2.   

Abstract

Action selection often requires the transformation of visual information into motor plans. Preventing premature responses may entail the suppression of visual input and/or of prepared muscle activity. This study examined how the quality of visual information affects frontobasal ganglia (BG) routes associated with response selection and inhibition. Human fMRI data were collected from a stop task with visually degraded or intact face stimuli. During go trials, degraded spatial frequency information reduced the speed of information accumulation and response cautiousness. Effective connectivity analysis of the fMRI data showed action selection to emerge through the classic direct and indirect BG pathways, with inputs deriving form both prefrontal and visual regions. When stimuli were degraded, visual and prefrontal regions processing the stimulus information increased connectivity strengths toward BG, whereas regions evaluating visual scene content or response strategies reduced connectivity toward BG. Response inhibition during stop trials recruited the indirect and hyperdirect BG pathways, with input from visual and prefrontal regions. Importantly, when stimuli were nondegraded and processed fast, the optimal stop model contained additional connections from prefrontal to visual cortex. Individual differences analysis revealed that stronger prefrontal-to-visual connectivity covaried with faster inhibition times. Therefore, prefrontal-to-visual cortex connections appear to suppress the fast flow of visual input for the go task, such that the inhibition process can finish before the selection process. These results indicate response selection and inhibition within the BG to emerge through the interplay of top-down adjustments from prefrontal and bottom-up input from sensory cortex.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25647338     DOI: 10.1162/jocn_a_00792

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci        ISSN: 0898-929X            Impact factor:   3.225


  10 in total

1.  Strategic down-regulation of attentional resources as a mechanism of proactive response inhibition.

Authors:  Zachary D Langford; Ruth M Krebs; Durk Talsma; Marty G Woldorff; C N Boehler
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2016-07-29       Impact factor: 3.386

2.  Learning in Visual Regions as Support for the Bias in Future Value-Driven Choice.

Authors:  Sara Jahfari; Jan Theeuwes; Tomas Knapen
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2020-04-14       Impact factor: 5.357

3.  Motivational context for response inhibition influences proactive involvement of attention.

Authors:  Zachary D Langford; Hanne Schevernels; C Nico Boehler
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-10-12       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Response Inhibition Is Facilitated by a Change to Red Over Green in the Stop Signal Paradigm.

Authors:  Shawn Blizzard; Adriela Fierro-Rojas; Mazyar Fallah
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2017-01-04       Impact factor: 3.169

5.  Sensitivity to value-driven attention is predicted by how we learn from value.

Authors:  Sara Jahfari; Jan Theeuwes
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2017-04

6.  Enhanced inhibitory control during re-engagement processing in badminton athletes: An event-related potential study.

Authors:  Jiacheng Chen; Yanan Li; Guanghui Zhang; Xinhong Jin; Yingzhi Lu; Chenglin Zhou
Journal:  J Sport Health Sci       Date:  2019-05-17       Impact factor: 7.179

7.  Mid-Frontal Theta Modulates Response Inhibition and Decision Making Processes in Emotional Contexts.

Authors:  Siddharth Nayak; ChiiShyang Kuo; Arthur Chih-Hsin Tsai
Journal:  Brain Sci       Date:  2019-10-11

8.  The Amsterdam Open MRI Collection, a set of multimodal MRI datasets for individual difference analyses.

Authors:  Lukas Snoek; Maite M van der Miesen; Tinka Beemsterboer; Andries van der Leij; Annemarie Eigenhuis; H Steven Scholte
Journal:  Sci Data       Date:  2021-03-19       Impact factor: 6.444

9.  Inhibition-Induced Forgetting Results from Resource Competition between Response Inhibition and Memory Encoding Processes.

Authors:  Yu-Chin Chiu; Tobias Egner
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2015-08-26       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  Scene complexity modulates degree of feedback activity during object detection in natural scenes.

Authors:  Iris I A Groen; Sara Jahfari; Noor Seijdel; Sennay Ghebreab; Victor A F Lamme; H Steven Scholte
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2018-12-31       Impact factor: 4.475

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.