Literature DB >> 25647202

Measuring surgical outcomes for improvement: was Codman wrong?

Donald M Berwick1.   

Abstract

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25647202     DOI: 10.1001/jama.2015.4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA        ISSN: 0098-7484            Impact factor:   56.272


× No keyword cloud information.
  12 in total

Review 1.  [The validity of routine data on quality assurance: A qualitative systematic review].

Authors:  E Hanisch; T F Weigel; A Buia; H-P Bruch
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 0.955

2.  Not the Last Word: Codman Was Right--Spread The Word.

Authors:  Joseph Bernstein
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2015-06-05       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Derivation, Validation and Application of a Pragmatic Risk Prediction Index for Benchmarking of Surgical Outcomes.

Authors:  Richard T Spence; David C Chang; Haytham M A Kaafarani; Eugenio Panieri; Geoffrey A Anderson; Matthew M Hutter
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 3.352

4.  Association of Quality Improvement Registry Participation With Appropriate Follow-up After Vascular Procedures.

Authors:  Benjamin S. Brooke; Adam W. Beck; Larry W. Kraiss; Andrew W. Hoel; Andrea M. Austin; Amir A. Ghaffarian; Jack L. Cronenwett; Philip P. Goodney
Journal:  JAMA Surg       Date:  2018-03-01       Impact factor: 14.766

5.  Improving Patient Outcomes in Gynecology: The Role of Large Data Registries and Big Data Analytics.

Authors:  Elisabeth A Erekson; Cheryl B Iglesia
Journal:  J Minim Invasive Gynecol       Date:  2015-07-15       Impact factor: 4.137

6.  Mixed methods evaluation of the Getting it Right First Time programme in elective orthopaedic surgery in England: an analysis from the National Joint Registry and Hospital Episode Statistics.

Authors:  Helen Barratt; Andrew Hutchings; Elena Pizzo; Fiona Aspinal; Sarah Jasim; Rafael Gafoor; Jean Ledger; Raj Mehta; James Mason; Peter Martin; Naomi J Fulop; Stephen Morris; Rosalind Raine
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2022-06-16       Impact factor: 3.006

7.  Urgent look: Why Neurosurgeons are being evaluated primarily by subjective patient's satisfaction survey rather than objective neurological outcomes.

Authors:  R F Ghaly; A Lissounov
Journal:  Surg Neurol Int       Date:  2017-10-13

8.  Pediatric Surgeon Perceptions of Participation in External Patient Safety Programs: impact on Patient Safety.

Authors:  Loren Berman; Shawn Rangel; KuoJen Tsao
Journal:  Pediatr Qual Saf       Date:  2018-12-06

9.  Beyond Measurement and Reward: Methods of Motivating Quality Improvement and Accountability.

Authors:  Robert A Berenson; Thomas Rice
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2015-11-10       Impact factor: 3.402

10.  The Use of Clinical Registries in the United States: A Landscape Survey.

Authors:  Seth Blumenthal
Journal:  EGEMS (Wash DC)       Date:  2017-12-07
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.