Alice Semerjian1, Sara L Zettervall2, Richard Amdur2, Thomas W Jarrett1, Khashayar Vaziri2. 1. 1 Department of Urology, George Washington University School of Medicine & Health Sciences , Washington, D.C. 2. 2 Department of Surgery, George Washington University School of Medicine & Health Sciences , Washington, D.C.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Prolonged operative time (ORT) is often considered a drawback to minimally invasive surgery (MIS) because of increased morbidity. Limited data exist comparing long laparoscopic ORT with similar or shorter open ORT. This study aims to identify ORT when a minimally invasive procedure becomes inferior to its open counterpart. METHODS: Minimally invasive and open total and partial nephrectomies and nephroureterectomies were identified in the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) from 2005 to 2012. Procedures were split into open and minimally invasive nephrectomy and then stratified into four ORT groups: 0 to 90 minutes, 91 minutes to 3 hours, 3 to 6 hours, and ≥ 6 hours. Thirty-day mortality and morbidity were analyzed. Univariate analysis was performed using chi-square and Fisher exact tests. Significant univariate results were then tested using stepwise logistic regression, controlling for demographics, comorbidities, and preoperative treatments. RESULTS: There were 14,813 patients identified. Both partial and total minimally invasive kidney procedures had significantly improved outcomes compared with open counterparts of similar ORT. In the total nephrectomy group, a minimally invasive approach had a lower rate of surgical site infections, sepsis, pneumonia, return to operating room, and overall length of stay when compared with open procedures of the same duration. Length of hospital stay decreased in MIS regardless of operative time, except when comparing minimally invasive cases longer than 6 hours with open cases less than 90 minutes. Transfusion rates also significantly decreased in minimally invasive total nephrectomy cases. In the partial nephrectomy group, similar outcomes were seen in terms of length of stay and infectious outcomes. Interestingly, transfusion risk was decreased in the open partial nephrectomy group when comparing cases less than 90 minutes with minimally invasive partial nephrectomies lasting 3 to 6 hours; otherwise there was no significant correlation with transfusion risk. CONCLUSIONS: Minimally invasive operations are less morbid than open operations of similar ORT. Longer and likely more complex laparoscopic procedures continue to provide a benefit to patients when compared with shorter and possibly less complex open procedures. These data should be considered during a surgeon's preoperative and operative decision-making.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Prolonged operative time (ORT) is often considered a drawback to minimally invasive surgery (MIS) because of increased morbidity. Limited data exist comparing long laparoscopic ORT with similar or shorter open ORT. This study aims to identify ORT when a minimally invasive procedure becomes inferior to its open counterpart. METHODS: Minimally invasive and open total and partial nephrectomies and nephroureterectomies were identified in the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) from 2005 to 2012. Procedures were split into open and minimally invasive nephrectomy and then stratified into four ORT groups: 0 to 90 minutes, 91 minutes to 3 hours, 3 to 6 hours, and ≥ 6 hours. Thirty-day mortality and morbidity were analyzed. Univariate analysis was performed using chi-square and Fisher exact tests. Significant univariate results were then tested using stepwise logistic regression, controlling for demographics, comorbidities, and preoperative treatments. RESULTS: There were 14,813 patients identified. Both partial and total minimally invasive kidney procedures had significantly improved outcomes compared with open counterparts of similar ORT. In the total nephrectomy group, a minimally invasive approach had a lower rate of surgical site infections, sepsis, pneumonia, return to operating room, and overall length of stay when compared with open procedures of the same duration. Length of hospital stay decreased in MIS regardless of operative time, except when comparing minimally invasive cases longer than 6 hours with open cases less than 90 minutes. Transfusion rates also significantly decreased in minimally invasive total nephrectomy cases. In the partial nephrectomy group, similar outcomes were seen in terms of length of stay and infectious outcomes. Interestingly, transfusion risk was decreased in the open partial nephrectomy group when comparing cases less than 90 minutes with minimally invasive partial nephrectomies lasting 3 to 6 hours; otherwise there was no significant correlation with transfusion risk. CONCLUSIONS: Minimally invasive operations are less morbid than open operations of similar ORT. Longer and likely more complex laparoscopic procedures continue to provide a benefit to patients when compared with shorter and possibly less complex open procedures. These data should be considered during a surgeon's preoperative and operative decision-making.
Authors: Samantha L Margulies; Maria V Vargas; Kathryn Denny; Andrew D Sparks; Cherie Q Marfori; Gaby Moawad; Richard L Amdur Journal: Surg Endosc Date: 2019-05-16 Impact factor: 4.584
Authors: Kirsten L Simmons; Jason C Chandrapal; Steven Wolf; Henry E Rice; Elisabeth E Tracy; Tamara Fitzgerald; Gina-Maria Pomann; Jonathan C Routh Journal: J Pediatr Urol Date: 2021-03-19 Impact factor: 1.921