Literature DB >> 25646214

Current evidence and future perspectives on the effective practice of patient-centered laboratory medicine.

Mike J Hallworth1, Paul L Epner2, Christoph Ebert3, Corinne R Fantz4, Sherry A Faye5, Trefor N Higgins6, Eric S Kilpatrick7, Wenzhe Li8, S V Rana9, Florent Vanstapel10.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Systematic evidence of the contribution made by laboratory medicine to patient outcomes and the overall process of healthcare is difficult to find. An understanding of the value of laboratory medicine, how it can be determined, and the various factors that influence it is vital to ensuring that the service is provided and used optimally. CONTENT: This review summarizes existing evidence supporting the impact of laboratory medicine in healthcare and indicates the gaps in our understanding. It also identifies deficiencies in current utilization, suggests potential solutions, and offers a vision of a future in which laboratory medicine is used optimally to support patient care.
SUMMARY: To maximize the value of laboratory medicine, work is required in 5 areas: (a) improved utilization of existing and new tests; (b) definition of new roles for laboratory professionals that are focused on optimizing patient outcomes by adding value at all points of the diagnostic brain-to-brain cycle; (c) development of standardized protocols for prospective patient-centered studies of biomarker clinical effectiveness or extraanalytical process effectiveness; (d) benchmarking of existing and new tests in specified situations with commonly accepted measures of effectiveness; (e) agreed definition and validation of effectiveness measures and use of checklists for articles submitted for publication. Progress in these areas is essential if we are to demonstrate and enhance the value of laboratory medicine and prevent valuable information being lost in meaningless data. This requires effective collaboration with clinicians, and a determination to accept patient outcome and patient experience as the primary measure of laboratory effectiveness.
© 2014 American Association for Clinical Chemistry.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25646214     DOI: 10.1373/clinchem.2014.232629

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Chem        ISSN: 0009-9147            Impact factor:   8.327


  8 in total

Review 1.  The Pursuit of Value in Laboratory Medicine - Progress and Challenges.

Authors:  Andrew St John
Journal:  Clin Biochem Rev       Date:  2020-02

Review 2.  Bringing the clinical laboratory into the strategy to advance diagnostic excellence.

Authors:  Ira M Lubin; J Rex Astles; Shahram Shahangian; Bereneice Madison; Ritchard Parry; Robert L Schmidt; Matthew L Rubinstein
Journal:  Diagnosis (Berl)       Date:  2021-01-06

3.  Using clinical guidelines to assess the potential value of laboratory medicine in clinical decision-making.

Authors:  Allan J Hicks; Zoe L Carwardine; Mike J Hallworth; Eric S Kilpatrick
Journal:  Biochem Med (Zagreb)       Date:  2020-12-15       Impact factor: 2.313

4.  Perception of usefulness of laboratory tests ordering by internal medicine residents in ambulatory setting: A single-center prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Dimitria Doi; Romulo Ribeiro do Vale; Jean Michell Correia Monteiro; Glauco Cabral Marinho Plens; Mario Ferreira Junior; Luiz Augusto Marcondes Fonseca; Sandro Félix Perazzio; Bruno Adler Maccagnan Pinheiro Besen; Arnaldo Lichtenstein; Leandro Utino Taniguchi; Nairo Massakazu Sumita; Aline Pivetta Corá; Adriana Pasmanik Eisencraft; Alberto José da Silva Duarte
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-05-11       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 5.  Effectiveness of Practices to Support Appropriate Laboratory Test Utilization: A Laboratory Medicine Best Practices Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Matthew Rubinstein; Robert Hirsch; Kakali Bandyopadhyay; Bereneice Madison; Thomas Taylor; Anne Ranne; Millie Linville; Keri Donaldson; Felicitas Lacbawan; Nancy Cornish
Journal:  Am J Clin Pathol       Date:  2018-02-17       Impact factor: 2.493

6.  Strengthening the clinical laboratory workforce in Cambodia: a case study of a mixed-method in-service training program to improve laboratory quality management system oversight.

Authors:  Siew Kim Ong; Grant T Donovan; Nayah Ndefru; Sophanna Song; Chhayheng Leang; Sophat Sek; Michael Noble; Lucy A Perrone
Journal:  Hum Resour Health       Date:  2020-11-04

7.  A method for measuring the experimental resolution of laboratory assays (clinical biochemical, blood count, immunological, and qPCR) to evaluate analytical performance.

Authors:  Chenxi Sun; Dongxia Wang; Henggui Xu; Guang Yang; Xiaomei Yan; Hui Liu
Journal:  J Clin Lab Anal       Date:  2021-11-01       Impact factor: 2.352

8.  Improving American Healthcare Through "Clinical Lab 2.0": A Project Santa Fe Report.

Authors:  James M Crawford; Khosrow Shotorbani; Gaurav Sharma; Michael Crossey; Tarush Kothari; Thomas S Lorey; Jeffrey W Prichard; Myra Wilkerson; Nancy Fisher
Journal:  Acad Pathol       Date:  2017-04-18
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.