Mike J Hallworth1, Paul L Epner2, Christoph Ebert3, Corinne R Fantz4, Sherry A Faye5, Trefor N Higgins6, Eric S Kilpatrick7, Wenzhe Li8, S V Rana9, Florent Vanstapel10. 1. Department of Clinical Biochemistry, Royal Shrewsbury Hospital, Shrewsbury, Shropshire, UK; mikejhallworth@gmail.com. 2. Paul Epner LLC, Evanston, IL; 3. Roche Diagnostics GmbH, Penzberg, Germany; 4. Labsource LLC, Atlanta, GA; 5. Beckman Coulter Eurocenter SA, Nyon, Switzerland; 6. DynaLIFE Dx, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada; 7. Department of Clinical Biochemistry, Hull Royal Infirmary, Hull, UK; 8. NMS Labs, Willow Grove, PA; 9. Department of Gastroenterology, PGIMER, Chandigarh, India; 10. University Hospitals Leuven-Gasthuisberg, Leuven, Belgium.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Systematic evidence of the contribution made by laboratory medicine to patient outcomes and the overall process of healthcare is difficult to find. An understanding of the value of laboratory medicine, how it can be determined, and the various factors that influence it is vital to ensuring that the service is provided and used optimally. CONTENT: This review summarizes existing evidence supporting the impact of laboratory medicine in healthcare and indicates the gaps in our understanding. It also identifies deficiencies in current utilization, suggests potential solutions, and offers a vision of a future in which laboratory medicine is used optimally to support patient care. SUMMARY: To maximize the value of laboratory medicine, work is required in 5 areas: (a) improved utilization of existing and new tests; (b) definition of new roles for laboratory professionals that are focused on optimizing patient outcomes by adding value at all points of the diagnostic brain-to-brain cycle; (c) development of standardized protocols for prospective patient-centered studies of biomarker clinical effectiveness or extraanalytical process effectiveness; (d) benchmarking of existing and new tests in specified situations with commonly accepted measures of effectiveness; (e) agreed definition and validation of effectiveness measures and use of checklists for articles submitted for publication. Progress in these areas is essential if we are to demonstrate and enhance the value of laboratory medicine and prevent valuable information being lost in meaningless data. This requires effective collaboration with clinicians, and a determination to accept patient outcome and patient experience as the primary measure of laboratory effectiveness.
BACKGROUND: Systematic evidence of the contribution made by laboratory medicine to patient outcomes and the overall process of healthcare is difficult to find. An understanding of the value of laboratory medicine, how it can be determined, and the various factors that influence it is vital to ensuring that the service is provided and used optimally. CONTENT: This review summarizes existing evidence supporting the impact of laboratory medicine in healthcare and indicates the gaps in our understanding. It also identifies deficiencies in current utilization, suggests potential solutions, and offers a vision of a future in which laboratory medicine is used optimally to support patient care. SUMMARY: To maximize the value of laboratory medicine, work is required in 5 areas: (a) improved utilization of existing and new tests; (b) definition of new roles for laboratory professionals that are focused on optimizing patient outcomes by adding value at all points of the diagnostic brain-to-brain cycle; (c) development of standardized protocols for prospective patient-centered studies of biomarker clinical effectiveness or extraanalytical process effectiveness; (d) benchmarking of existing and new tests in specified situations with commonly accepted measures of effectiveness; (e) agreed definition and validation of effectiveness measures and use of checklists for articles submitted for publication. Progress in these areas is essential if we are to demonstrate and enhance the value of laboratory medicine and prevent valuable information being lost in meaningless data. This requires effective collaboration with clinicians, and a determination to accept patient outcome and patient experience as the primary measure of laboratory effectiveness.
Authors: Ira M Lubin; J Rex Astles; Shahram Shahangian; Bereneice Madison; Ritchard Parry; Robert L Schmidt; Matthew L Rubinstein Journal: Diagnosis (Berl) Date: 2021-01-06
Authors: Siew Kim Ong; Grant T Donovan; Nayah Ndefru; Sophanna Song; Chhayheng Leang; Sophat Sek; Michael Noble; Lucy A Perrone Journal: Hum Resour Health Date: 2020-11-04
Authors: James M Crawford; Khosrow Shotorbani; Gaurav Sharma; Michael Crossey; Tarush Kothari; Thomas S Lorey; Jeffrey W Prichard; Myra Wilkerson; Nancy Fisher Journal: Acad Pathol Date: 2017-04-18