Literature DB >> 25646104

Decline in economic returns from new drugs raises questions about sustaining innovations.

Ernst R Berndt1, Deanna Nass2, Michael Kleinrock3, Murray Aitken4.   

Abstract

The sales and financial returns realized by pharmaceutical companies are a frequent topic of discussion and debate. In this study we analyzed the economic returns for four cohorts of new prescription drugs launched in the United States (in 1991-94, 1995-99, 2000-04, and 2005-09) and compared fluctuations in revenues with changing average research and development (R&D) and other costs to determine patterns in rewards for pharmaceutical innovation. We found that the average present values of lifetime net economic returns were positive and reached a peak with the 1995-99 and 2000-04 new drug cohorts. However, returns have fallen sharply since then, with those for the 2005-09 cohort being very slightly negative and, on average, failing to recoup research and development and other costs. If this level of diminished returns persists, we believe that the rewards for innovation will not be sufficient for pharmaceutical manufacturers to maintain the historical rates of investments needed to sustain biomedical innovation. Project HOPE—The People-to-People Health Foundation, Inc.

Keywords:  Biotechnology; Pharmaceuticals; Research And Technology

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25646104     DOI: 10.1377/hlthaff.2014.1029

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)        ISSN: 0278-2715            Impact factor:   6.301


  15 in total

1.  Public R&D Investments and Private-sector Patenting: Evidence from NIH Funding Rules.

Authors:  Pierre Azoulay; Danielle Li; Joshua S Graff Zivin; Bhaven N Sampat
Journal:  Rev Econ Stud       Date:  2018-06-15

2.  Establishing a reasonable price for an orphan drug.

Authors:  Mikel Berdud; Michael Drummond; Adrian Towse
Journal:  Cost Eff Resour Alloc       Date:  2020-09-04

3.  When Quality Beats Quantity: Decision Theory, Drug Discovery, and the Reproducibility Crisis.

Authors:  Jack W Scannell; Jim Bosley
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-02-10       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 4.  Addressing the challenge of high-priced prescription drugs in the era of precision medicine: A systematic review of drug life cycles, therapeutic drug markets and regulatory frameworks.

Authors:  Toon van der Gronde; Carin A Uyl-de Groot; Toine Pieters
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-08-16       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  From Gutenberg to Open Science: An Unfulfilled Odyssey.

Authors:  Chris R Triggle; David J Triggle
Journal:  Drug Dev Res       Date:  2016-10-21       Impact factor: 4.360

Review 6.  Financing Drug Innovation in the US: Current Framework and Emerging Challenges.

Authors:  David Cutler; Noam Kirson; Genia Long
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2020-09       Impact factor: 4.981

7.  Industry Perspectives on Market Access of Innovative Drugs: The Relevance for Oncology Drugs.

Authors:  Kim Pauwels; Isabelle Huys; Minne Casteels; Steven Simoens
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2016-06-01       Impact factor: 5.810

Review 8.  A Single-use Strategy to Enable Manufacturing of Affordable Biologics.

Authors:  Renaud Jacquemart; Melissa Vandersluis; Mochao Zhao; Karan Sukhija; Navneet Sidhu; Jim Stout
Journal:  Comput Struct Biotechnol J       Date:  2016-07-05       Impact factor: 7.271

Review 9.  Value-Based Pricing and Reimbursement in Personalised Healthcare: Introduction to the Basic Health Economics.

Authors:  Louis P Garrison; Adrian Towse
Journal:  J Pers Med       Date:  2017-09-04

10.  Assessing the Financial Value of Patient Engagement: A Quantitative Approach from CTTI's Patient Groups and Clinical Trials Project.

Authors:  Bennett Levitan; Kenneth Getz; Eric L Eisenstein; Michelle Goldberg; Matthew Harker; Sharon Hesterlee; Bray Patrick-Lake; Jamie N Roberts; Joseph DiMasi
Journal:  Ther Innov Regul Sci       Date:  2017-07-17       Impact factor: 1.778

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.