Literature DB >> 25645428

Efficacy of thigh volume ratios assessed via stereovision body imaging as a predictor of visceral adipose tissue measured by magnetic resonance imaging.

Jane J Lee1, Jeanne H Freeland-Graves1, M Reese Pepper1, Wurong Yu1,2, Bugao Xu1,2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The research examined the efficacy of regional volumes of thigh ratios assessed by stereovision body imaging (SBI) as a predictor of visceral adipose tissue measured by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Body measurements obtained via SBI also were utilized to explore disparities of body size and shape in men and women.
METHOD: One hundred twenty-one participants were measured for total/regional body volumes and ratios via SBI and abdominal subcutaneous and visceral adipose tissue areas by MRI.
RESULTS: Thigh to torso and thigh to abdomen-hip volume ratios were the most reliable parameters to predict the accumulation of visceral adipose tissue depots compared to other body measurements. Thigh volume in relation to torso [odds ratios (OR) 0.44] and abdomen-hip (OR 0.41) volumes were negatively associated with increased risks of greater visceral adipose tissue depots, even after controlling for age, gender, and body mass index (BMI). Irrespective of BMI classification, men exhibited greater total body (80.95L vs. 72.41L), torso (39.26L vs. 34.13L), and abdomen-hip (29.01L vs. 25.85L) volumes than women. Women had higher thigh volumes (4.93L vs. 3.99L) and lower-body volume ratios [thigh to total body (0.07 vs. 0.05), thigh to torso (0.15 vs. 0.11), and thigh to abdomen-hip (0.20 vs. 0.15); P < 0.05].
CONCLUSIONS: The unique parameters of the volumes of thigh in relation to torso and abdomen-hip, by SBI were highly effective in predicting visceral adipose tissue deposition. The SBI provided an efficient method for determining body size and shape in men and women via total and regional body volumes and ratios. Am. J. Hum. Biol. 27:445-457, 2015.
© 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25645428      PMCID: PMC4478126          DOI: 10.1002/ajhb.22663

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Hum Biol        ISSN: 1042-0533            Impact factor:   1.937


  56 in total

1.  Abdominal diameter index: a more powerful anthropometric measure for prevalent coronary heart disease risk in adult males.

Authors:  D A Smith; E M Ness; R Herbert; C B Schechter; R A Phillips; J A Diamond; P J Landrigan
Journal:  Diabetes Obes Metab       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 6.577

2.  Larger hip circumference independently predicts health and longevity in a Swedish female cohort.

Authors:  L Lissner; C Björkelund; B L Heitmann; J C Seidell; C Bengtsson
Journal:  Obes Res       Date:  2001-10

3.  Waist and hip circumferences have independent and opposite effects on cardiovascular disease risk factors: the Quebec Family Study.

Authors:  J C Seidell; L Pérusse; J P Després; C Bouchard
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 7.045

4.  A better index of body adiposity.

Authors:  Richard N Bergman; Darko Stefanovski; Thomas A Buchanan; Anne E Sumner; James C Reynolds; Nancy G Sebring; Anny H Xiang; Richard M Watanabe
Journal:  Obesity (Silver Spring)       Date:  2011-03-03       Impact factor: 5.002

5.  Mechanisms underlying regional differences in lipolysis in human adipose tissue.

Authors:  H Wahrenberg; F Lönnqvist; P Arner
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  1989-08       Impact factor: 14.808

6.  Associations of hip and thigh circumferences independent of waist circumference with the incidence of type 2 diabetes: the Hoorn Study.

Authors:  Marieke B Snijder; Jacqueline M Dekker; Marjolein Visser; Lex M Bouter; Coen D A Stehouwer; Piet J Kostense; John S Yudkin; Robert J Heine; Giel Nijpels; Jacob C Seidell
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 7.045

7.  Three-dimensional surface imaging system for assessing human obesity.

Authors:  Bugao Xu; Wurong Yu; Ming Yao; M Reese Pepper; Jeanne H Freeland-Graves
Journal:  Opt Eng       Date:  2009-10-01

8.  Leg fat mass as measured by dual X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) impacts insulin resistance differently in obese women versus men.

Authors:  Gunnar Aasen; Hans Fagertun; Serena Tonstad; Johan Halse
Journal:  Scand J Clin Lab Invest       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 1.713

9.  BMI compared with 3-dimensional body shape: the UK National Sizing Survey.

Authors:  Jonathan C K Wells; Philip Treleaven; Tim J Cole
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 7.045

10.  Ratio of trunk to leg volume as a new body shape metric for diabetes and mortality.

Authors:  Joseph P Wilson; Alka M Kanaya; Bo Fan; John A Shepherd
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-07-10       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  7 in total

1.  Clinical anthropometrics and body composition from 3D whole-body surface scans.

Authors:  B K Ng; B J Hinton; B Fan; A M Kanaya; J A Shepherd
Journal:  Eur J Clin Nutr       Date:  2016-06-22       Impact factor: 4.016

2.  Measuring body composition in low-resource settings across the life course.

Authors:  John A Shepherd; Steven B Heymsfield; Shane A Norris; Leanne M Redman; Leigh C Ward; Christine Slater
Journal:  Obesity (Silver Spring)       Date:  2016-04-07       Impact factor: 5.002

3.  A Novel Hybrid Model for Visceral Adipose Tissue Prediction using Shape Descriptors.

Authors:  Qiyue Wang; Yao Lu; Xiaoke Zhang; James K Hahn
Journal:  Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc       Date:  2019-07

4.  Body composition estimation from selected slices: equations computed from a new semi-automatic thresholding method developed on whole-body CT scans.

Authors:  Alizé Lacoste Jeanson; Ján Dupej; Chiara Villa; Jaroslav Brůžek
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2017-05-18       Impact factor: 2.984

5.  Comparison of 3D laser-based photonic scans and manual anthropometric measurements of body size and shape in a validation study of 123 young Swiss men.

Authors:  Frank J Rühli; Kaspar Staub; Nikola Koepke; Marcel Zwahlen; Jonathan C Wells; Nicole Bender; Maciej Henneberg
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2017-02-09       Impact factor: 2.984

6.  Multiple measures derived from 3D photonic body scans improve predictions of fat and muscle mass in young Swiss men.

Authors:  Roman Sager; Sabine Güsewell; Frank Rühli; Nicole Bender; Kaspar Staub
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-06-11       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Silhouette images enable estimation of body fat distribution and associated cardiometabolic risk.

Authors:  Marcus D R Klarqvist; Saaket Agrawal; Nathaniel Diamant; Patrick T Ellinor; Anthony Philippakis; Kenney Ng; Puneet Batra; Amit V Khera
Journal:  NPJ Digit Med       Date:  2022-07-27
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.