Literature DB >> 25645416

Assessment of various types of US findings after irreversible electroporation in porcine liver: comparison with radiofrequency ablation.

Katsutoshi Sugimoto1, Fuminori Moriyasu2, Yoshiyuki Kobayashi3, Kazuhiko Kasuya4, Yuichi Nagakawa4, Akihiko Tsuchida4, Takeshi Hara5, Hiroaki Iobe6, Hisashi Oshiro6.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To assess various ultrasound (US) findings, including B-mode, shear-wave elastography (SWE), and contrast-enhanced US, in accurately assessing ablation margins after irreversible electroporation (IRE) based on radiologic-pathologic correlation, and to compare these findings between IRE and radiofrequency (RF) ablation.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: IRE (n = 9) and RF ablation (n = 3) were performed in vivo in three pig livers. Each ablation zone was imaged by each method immediately after the procedure and 90 minutes later. Ablation zones were evaluated based on gross pathologic and histopathologic findings in samples from animals euthanized 2 hours after the last ablation. The characteristics and dimensions of the histologic ablation zones were qualitatively and quantitatively compared against each US finding.
RESULTS: In B-mode US at 90 minutes after IRE, the ablation zones appeared as hyperechoic areas with a peripheral hyperechoic rim, showing excellent correlation (r(2) = 0.905, P < .0001) with gross pathologic findings. SWE showed that tissue stiffness in the IRE ablation zones increased over time. Contrast-enhanced US depicted the IRE ablation zones as hypovascular areas in the portal phase, and showed the highest correlation (r(2) = 0.923, P < .0001) with gross pathologic findings. The RF ablation zones were clearly visualized by B-mode US. SWE showed that tissue stiffness after RF ablation was higher than after IRE. Contrast-enhanced US depicted the RF ablation zones as avascular areas.
CONCLUSIONS: IRE and RF ablation zones can be most accurately predicted by portal-phase contrast-enhanced US measurements obtained immediately after ablation.
Copyright © 2015. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25645416     DOI: 10.1016/j.jvir.2014.11.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vasc Interv Radiol        ISSN: 1051-0443            Impact factor:   3.464


  8 in total

1.  Irreversible electroporation for nonthermal tumor ablation in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma: initial clinical experience in Japan.

Authors:  Katsutoshi Sugimoto; Fuminori Moriyasu; Yoshiyuki Kobayashi; Kazuhiro Saito; Hirohito Takeuchi; Saori Ogawa; Mayumi Ando; Takatomo Sano; Toshifumi Mori; Yoshihiro Furuichi; Ikuo Nakamura
Journal:  Jpn J Radiol       Date:  2015-06-02       Impact factor: 2.374

2.  Induction of rapid, reproducible hepatic ablations using next-generation, high frequency irreversible electroporation (H-FIRE) in vivo.

Authors:  Imran A Siddiqui; Eduardo L Latouche; Matthew R DeWitt; Jacob H Swet; Russell C Kirks; Erin H Baker; David A Iannitti; Dionisios Vrochides; Rafael V Davalos; Iain H McKillop
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2016-07-26       Impact factor: 3.647

3.  A Comparative Study of Ablation Boundary Sharpness After Percutaneous Radiofrequency, Cryo-, Microwave, and Irreversible Electroporation Ablation in Normal Swine Liver and Kidneys.

Authors:  Francois H Cornelis; Jeremy C Durack; Simon Y Kimm; Thomas Wimmer; Jonathan A Coleman; Stephen B Solomon; Govindarajan Srimathveeravalli
Journal:  Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol       Date:  2017-05-17       Impact factor: 2.740

Review 4.  Time-Dependent Impact of Irreversible Electroporation on Pancreas, Liver, Blood Vessels and Nerves: A Systematic Review of Experimental Studies.

Authors:  J A Vogel; E van Veldhuisen; P Agnass; J Crezee; F Dijk; J Verheij; T M van Gulik; M R Meijerink; L G Vroomen; K P van Lienden; M G Besselink
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-11-21       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Time-Dependent Impact of Irreversible Electroporation on Pathology and Ablation Size in the Porcine Liver: A 24-Hour Experimental Study.

Authors:  Jantien A Vogel; Eran van Veldhuisen; Lindy K Alles; Olivier R Busch; Frederike Dijk; Thomas M van Gulik; Goos M Huijzer; Marc G Besselink; Krijn P van Lienden; Joanne Verheij
Journal:  Technol Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2019-01-01

6.  Histopathological and Ultrastructural Changes after Electroporation in Pig Liver Using Parallel-Plate Electrodes and High-Performance Generator.

Authors:  B López-Alonso; A Hernáez; H Sarnago; A Naval; A Güemes; C Junquera; J M Burdío; T Castiella; E Monleón; J Gracia-Llanes; F Burdio; E Mejía; O Lucía
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-02-25       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Image guided ablation.

Authors:  Xinrui Zhang; Andreas Melzer
Journal:  Scott Med J       Date:  2021-11       Impact factor: 0.729

Review 8.  Recent progress in pulsed electric field ablation for liver cancer.

Authors:  Zhen-Guo Liu; Xin-Hua Chen; Zu-Jiang Yu; Jun Lv; Zhi-Gang Ren
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2020-06-28       Impact factor: 5.742

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.