Literature DB >> 25645414

Comparison of symmetric hemodialysis catheters using computational fluid dynamics.

Timothy W I Clark1, Giuseppe Isu2, Diego Gallo2, Pascal Verdonck3, Umberto Morbiducci2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Symmetric-tip dialysis catheters have become alternative devices because of low access recirculation and ease of tip positioning. Flow characteristics of three symmetric catheters were compared based on computational fluid dynamics (CFD) as they relate to catheter function.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: In Palindrome, GlidePath, and VectorFlow catheters, a computational fluid dynamics-based approach was used to assess (i) regions of flow separation, which are prone to thrombus development; (ii) shear-induced platelet activation potency; (iii) recirculation; and (iv) venous outflow deflection. A steady-state, laminar flow model simulated catheter tip position within the superior vena cava. Catheter performance was investigated at high hemodialysis flow rate (400 mL/min). Blood was assumed as a Newtonian fluid.
RESULTS: Wide regions of flow separation downstream of the Palindrome side slot and close to the distal tip were observed in forward and reversed line configurations. Geometric asymmetry of the distal guide wire aperture of the GlidePath catheter produced the highest levels of inverted velocity flow when run in reversed configuration. The lowest mean shear-induced platelet activation was exhibited by GlidePath and VectorFlow catheters; the Palindrome catheter exhibited 152% higher overall platelet activation potency. All catheters were associated with a recirculation close to zero; the helically contoured lumens of the VectorFlow catheter produced the greatest amount of deflection of venous flow away from the arterial lumen.
CONCLUSIONS: The VectorFlow catheter produced less shear-induced platelet activation than the Palindrome catheter and less flow separation than the Palindrome and GlidePath catheters irrespective of line configuration. These findings have potential implications for differences in thrombogenic risk during clinical performance of these catheters.
Copyright © 2015 SIR. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25645414     DOI: 10.1016/j.jvir.2014.11.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vasc Interv Radiol        ISSN: 1051-0443            Impact factor:   3.464


  4 in total

1.  Clinical and Regulatory Considerations for Central Venous Catheters for Hemodialysis.

Authors:  Douglas M Silverstein; Scott O Trerotola; Timothy Clark; Garth James; Wing Ng; Amy Dwyer; Marius C Florescu; Roman Shingarev; Stephen R Ash
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2018-10-11       Impact factor: 8.237

Review 2.  Ambulatory Hemodialysis-Technology Landscape and Potential for Patient-Centered Treatment.

Authors:  Nina Hojs; William H Fissell; Shuvo Roy
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2019-11-14       Impact factor: 8.237

Review 3.  Implantable Device-Related Infection.

Authors:  J Scott VanEpps; John G Younger
Journal:  Shock       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 3.454

4.  Clot accumulation at the tip of hemodialysis catheters in a large animal model.

Authors:  Michael G Tal; Ron Livne; Rotem Neeman
Journal:  J Vasc Access       Date:  2020-12-25       Impact factor: 2.283

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.