Literature DB >> 25645274

Parietal transcranial direct current stimulation modulates primary motor cortex excitability.

Guadalupe Nathzidy Rivera-Urbina1, Giorgi Batsikadze, Andrés Molero-Chamizo, Walter Paulus, Min-Fang Kuo, Michael A Nitsche.   

Abstract

The posterior parietal cortex is part of the cortical network involved in motor learning and is structurally and functionally connected with the primary motor cortex (M1). Neuroplastic alterations of neuronal connectivity might be an important basis for learning processes. These have however not been explored for parieto-motor connections in humans by transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS). Exploring tDCS effects on parieto-motor cortical connectivity might be functionally relevant, because tDCS has been shown to improve motor learning. We aimed to explore plastic alterations of parieto-motor cortical connections by tDCS in healthy humans. We measured neuroplastic changes of corticospinal excitability via motor evoked potentials (MEP) elicited by single-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) before and after tDCS over the left posterior parietal cortex (P3), and 3 cm posterior or lateral to P3, to explore the spatial specificity of the effects. Furthermore, short-interval intracortical inhibition/intracortical facilitation (SICI/ICF) over M1, and parieto-motor cortical connectivity were obtained before and after P3 tDCS. The results show polarity-dependent M1 excitability alterations primarily after P3 tDCS. Single-pulse TMS-elicited MEPs, M1 SICI/ICF at 5 and 7 ms and 10 and 15 ms interstimulus intervals (ISIs), and parieto-motor connectivity at 10 and 15 ms ISIs were all enhanced by anodal stimulation. Single pulse-TMS-elicited MEPs, and parieto-motor connectivity at 10 and 15 ms ISIs were reduced by cathodal tDCS. The respective corticospinal excitability alterations lasted for at least 120 min after stimulation. These results show an effect of remote stimulation of parietal areas on M1 excitability. The spatial specificity of the effects and the impact on parietal cortex-motor cortex connections suggest a relevant connectivity-driven effect.
© 2015 Federation of European Neuroscience Societies and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  motor evoked potential; plasticity; short interval intracortical inhibition/intracortical facilitation; transcranial magnetic stimulation

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25645274     DOI: 10.1111/ejn.12840

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Neurosci        ISSN: 0953-816X            Impact factor:   3.386


  12 in total

1.  Adaptation to Leftward Shifting Prisms Alters Motor Interhemispheric Inhibition.

Authors:  Elisa Martín-Arévalo; Selene Schintu; Alessandro Farnè; Laure Pisella; Karen T Reilly
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2018-02-01       Impact factor: 5.357

2.  Induced sensorimotor cortex plasticity remediates chronic treatment-resistant visual neglect.

Authors:  Jacinta O'Shea; Patrice Revol; Helena Cousijn; Jamie Near; Pierre Petitet; Sophie Jacquin-Courtois; Heidi Johansen-Berg; Gilles Rode; Yves Rossetti
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2017-09-12       Impact factor: 8.140

3.  Discernible effects of tDCS over the primary motor and posterior parietal cortex on different stages of motor learning.

Authors:  Guadalupe Nathzidy Rivera-Urbina; Andrés Molero-Chamizo; Michael A Nitsche
Journal:  Brain Struct Funct       Date:  2022-01-17       Impact factor: 3.270

4.  The relationships between motor behavior and sensory gating in the ball rotation task.

Authors:  Mayu Akaiwa; Yuya Matsuda; Yuta Soma; Eriko Shibata; Hidekazu Saito; Takeshi Sasaki; Kazuhiro Sugawara
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2022-08-11       Impact factor: 2.064

5.  Paired-Pulse Parietal-Motor Stimulation Differentially Modulates Corticospinal Excitability across Hemispheres When Combined with Prism Adaptation.

Authors:  Selene Schintu; Elisa Martín-Arévalo; Michael Vesia; Yves Rossetti; Romeo Salemme; Laure Pisella; Alessandro Farnè; Karen T Reilly
Journal:  Neural Plast       Date:  2016-06-22       Impact factor: 3.599

6.  Single-Session Anodal tDCS with Small-Size Stimulating Electrodes Over Frontoparietal Superficial Sites Does Not Affect Motor Sequence Learning.

Authors:  Fahimeh Hashemirad; Paul B Fitzgerald; Maryam Zoghi; Shapour Jaberzadeh
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2017-04-03       Impact factor: 3.169

7.  The Posterior Parietal Cortex Subserves Precise Motor Timing in Professional Drummers.

Authors:  Bettina Pollok; Katharina Stephan; Ariane Keitel; Vanessa Krause; Nora K Schaal
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2017-04-11       Impact factor: 3.169

8.  CREB controls cortical circuit plasticity and functional recovery after stroke.

Authors:  L Caracciolo; M Marosi; J Mazzitelli; S Latifi; Y Sano; L Galvan; R Kawaguchi; S Holley; M S Levine; G Coppola; C Portera-Cailliau; A J Silva; S T Carmichael
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2018-06-08       Impact factor: 17.694

9.  Current intensity- and polarity-specific online and aftereffects of transcranial direct current stimulation: An fMRI study.

Authors:  Asif Jamil; Giorgi Batsikadze; Hsiao-I Kuo; Raf L J Meesen; Peter Dechent; Walter Paulus; Michael A Nitsche
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2019-12-20       Impact factor: 5.038

10.  Environmental enrichment implies GAT-1 as a potential therapeutic target for stroke recovery.

Authors:  Yuhui Lin; Mengcheng Yao; Haiyin Wu; Feng Wu; Shiying Cao; Huanyu Ni; Jian Dong; Di Yang; Yanyu Sun; Xiaolin Kou; Jun Li; Hui Xiao; Lei Chang; Jin Wu; Yan Liu; Chunxia Luo; Dongya Zhu
Journal:  Theranostics       Date:  2021-01-27       Impact factor: 11.556

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.