OBJECTIVES: To investigate both cross-sectional and time-related changes of striatal and whole-brain microstructural properties in different stages of Huntington's disease (HD) using diffusion tensor imaging. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: From the TRACK-HD study, premanifest gene carriers (preHD), early manifest HD and controls were scanned at baseline and 2-year follow-up. Stratification of the preHD group into a far (preHD-A) and near (preHD-B) to predicted disease onset was performed. Age-corrected histograms of whole-brain white matter (WM), gray matter (GM) and striatal diffusion measures were computed and normalised by the number of voxels in each subject's data set. PRINCIPLE OBSERVATIONS: Higher cross-sectional mean, axial and radial diffusivities were found in both WM (P ≤ 0.001) and GM (P ≤ 0.001) of the manifest HD compared to the preHD and control groups. In preHD, only WM axial diffusivity (AD) was higher than in controls (P ≤ 0.01). This finding remained valid only in preHD-B (P ≤ 0.001). AD was also higher in the striatum of preHD-B compared to controls and preHD-A (P ≤ 0.01). Fractional anisotropy (FA) lacked sensitivity in differentiating between the groups. Histogram peak heights were generally lower in manifest HD compared to the preHD and control groups. No longitudinal differences were found in the degree of diffusivity change between the groups in the two year follow-up. There was a significant relationship between diffusivity and neurocognitive measures. CONCLUSIONS: Alterations in cross-sectional diffusion profiles between manifest HD subjects and controls were evident, both in whole-brain and striatum. In the preHD stage, only AD alterations were found, a finding suggesting that this metric is a sensitive marker for early change in HD prior to disease manifestation. The individual diffusivities were superior to FA in revealing pathologic microstructural brain alterations. Diffusion measures were well related to clinical functioning and disease stage.
OBJECTIVES: To investigate both cross-sectional and time-related changes of striatal and whole-brain microstructural properties in different stages of Huntington's disease (HD) using diffusion tensor imaging. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: From the TRACK-HD study, premanifest gene carriers (preHD), early manifest HD and controls were scanned at baseline and 2-year follow-up. Stratification of the preHD group into a far (preHD-A) and near (preHD-B) to predicted disease onset was performed. Age-corrected histograms of whole-brain white matter (WM), gray matter (GM) and striatal diffusion measures were computed and normalised by the number of voxels in each subject's data set. PRINCIPLE OBSERVATIONS: Higher cross-sectional mean, axial and radial diffusivities were found in both WM (P ≤ 0.001) and GM (P ≤ 0.001) of the manifest HD compared to the preHD and control groups. In preHD, only WM axial diffusivity (AD) was higher than in controls (P ≤ 0.01). This finding remained valid only in preHD-B (P ≤ 0.001). AD was also higher in the striatum of preHD-B compared to controls and preHD-A (P ≤ 0.01). Fractional anisotropy (FA) lacked sensitivity in differentiating between the groups. Histogram peak heights were generally lower in manifest HD compared to the preHD and control groups. No longitudinal differences were found in the degree of diffusivity change between the groups in the two year follow-up. There was a significant relationship between diffusivity and neurocognitive measures. CONCLUSIONS: Alterations in cross-sectional diffusion profiles between manifest HD subjects and controls were evident, both in whole-brain and striatum. In the preHD stage, only AD alterations were found, a finding suggesting that this metric is a sensitive marker for early change in HD prior to disease manifestation. The individual diffusivities were superior to FA in revealing pathologic microstructural brain alterations. Diffusion measures were well related to clinical functioning and disease stage.
Authors: M J Thieben; A J Duggins; C D Good; L Gomes; N Mahant; F Richards; E McCusker; R S J Frackowiak Journal: Brain Date: 2002-08 Impact factor: 13.501
Authors: S J A van den Bogaard; E M Dumas; L Ferrarini; J Milles; M A van Buchem; J van der Grond; R A C Roos Journal: J Neurol Sci Date: 2011-05-31 Impact factor: 3.181
Authors: Hugo Vrenken; Petra J W Pouwels; Jeroen J G Geurts; Dirk L Knol; Chris H Polman; Frederik Barkhof; Jonas A Castelijns Journal: J Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2006-05 Impact factor: 4.813
Authors: Sarah J Tabrizi; Rachael I Scahill; Alexandra Durr; Raymund Ac Roos; Blair R Leavitt; Rebecca Jones; G Bernhard Landwehrmeyer; Nick C Fox; Hans Johnson; Stephen L Hicks; Christopher Kennard; David Craufurd; Chris Frost; Douglas R Langbehn; Ralf Reilmann; Julie C Stout Journal: Lancet Neurol Date: 2010-12-02 Impact factor: 44.182
Authors: J P Vonsattel; R H Myers; T J Stevens; R J Ferrante; E D Bird; E P Richardson Journal: J Neuropathol Exp Neurol Date: 1985-11 Impact factor: 3.685
Authors: Joseph J Shaffer; Ali Ghayoor; Jeffrey D Long; Regina Eun-Young Kim; Spencer Lourens; Lauren J O'Donnell; Carl-Fredrik Westin; Yogesh Rathi; Vincent Magnotta; Jane S Paulsen; Hans J Johnson Journal: Hum Brain Mapp Date: 2017-01-03 Impact factor: 5.038
Authors: Deborah L Harrington; Jeffrey D Long; Sally Durgerian; Lyla Mourany; Katherine Koenig; Aaron Bonner-Jackson; Jane S Paulsen; Stephen M Rao Journal: Mov Disord Date: 2016-09-13 Impact factor: 10.338
Authors: Sarah Gregory; Helen Crawford; Kiran Seunarine; Blair Leavitt; Alexandra Durr; Raymund A C Roos; Rachael I Scahill; Sarah J Tabrizi; Geraint Rees; Douglas Langbehn; Michael Orth Journal: Hum Brain Mapp Date: 2018-04-22 Impact factor: 5.038
Authors: Mario Mascalchi; Chiara Marzi; Marco Giannelli; Stefano Ciulli; Andrea Bianchi; Andrea Ginestroni; Carlo Tessa; Emanuele Nicolai; Marco Aiello; Elena Salvatore; Andrea Soricelli; Stefano Diciotti Journal: PLoS One Date: 2018-07-12 Impact factor: 3.240