Literature DB >> 25644476

Cost comparison of re-usable and single-use fibrescopes in a large English teaching hospital.

R A McCahon1, D K Whynes2.   

Abstract

A number of studies in the U.S.A. and mainland Europe have described the costs of fibreoptic tracheal intubation. However, no such data from the UK appear available. We performed a cost assessment of fibreoptic intubation, using re-usable (various devices from Olympus, Acutronic and Karl Storz) and single-use (Ambu aScope) fibrescopes, at the Queens Medical Centre, Nottingham, U.K., between 1 January 2009 and 31 March 2014. The total annual cost of fibreoptic intubation with re-usable fibrescopes was £46,385. Based on 141 fibreoptic intubations per year, this equated to £329 per use, an average dominated by repair/maintenance costs (43%) and capital depreciation costs (42%). In comparison, the total annual cost of using single-use fibrescopes for the same work would have been around £200 per use. The analysis enabled us to develop a generic model, wherein we were able to describe the relationship between total cost of use vs number of uses for a fibrescope. An 'isopleth' was identified for this relationship: a line that joined all the points where the cost of re-usable vs single-use fibrescopes was equal. It appears cheaper to use single-use fibrescopes at up to 200 fibreoptic intubations per year (a range commensurate with normal practice) even when the repair rate for re-usable fibrescopes is low. Any centre, knowing its fibrescope use and repair rate, can plot its data similarly to help ascertain which of the re-usable or single-use fibrescope represents better value.
© 2015 The Association of Anaesthetists of Great Britain and Ireland.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25644476     DOI: 10.1111/anae.13011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anaesthesia        ISSN: 0003-2409            Impact factor:   6.955


  7 in total

1.  Use of the Ambu® aScope 2TM in laparoscopic common bile duct exploration.

Authors:  Yousif Aawsaj; Duncan Light; Jamie Brown; Liam Horgan
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-03-16       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  The Cost of Flexible Bronchoscopes: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Carina Østervig Andersen; Helena Travis; Emilie Dehlholm-Lambertsen; Rasmus Russell; Emmelie Ploug Jørgensen
Journal:  Pharmacoecon Open       Date:  2022-08-22

3.  Early Assessment of the Likely Cost Effectiveness of Single-Use Flexible Video Bronchoscopes.

Authors:  Christoffer Lilja Terjesen; Julia Kovaleva; Lars Ehlers
Journal:  Pharmacoecon Open       Date:  2017-06

4.  Evaluation of a re-useable bronchoscopy biosimulator with ventilated lungs.

Authors:  Justin L Garner; Stefan D Garner; Robin J Hardie; Philip L Molyneaux; Suveer Singh; Samuel V Kemp; Pallav L Shah
Journal:  ERJ Open Res       Date:  2019-04-15

5.  A systematic review and cost effectiveness analysis of reusable vs. single-use flexible bronchoscopes.

Authors:  J M Mouritsen; L Ehlers; J Kovaleva; I Ahmad; K El-Boghdadly
Journal:  Anaesthesia       Date:  2019-11-08       Impact factor: 6.955

6.  Repair costs of reusable bronchoscopes in the intensive care unit.

Authors:  Jonathan S Kurman; Bryan S Benn
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2022-02       Impact factor: 2.895

7.  Implementation of an Anaesthesia Quality Improvement Programme to Reduce Fibreoptic Bronchoscope Repair Incidents.

Authors:  Hsiao-Feng Lu; Kuo-Chuan Hung; Min-Hsien Chiang; Johnson Chia-Shen Yang; Sheng-Dean Luo; Jo-Chi Chin; Chih-Hsien Wang; Cheuk-Kwan Sun; Shao-Chun Wu
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2020-04-12       Impact factor: 3.411

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.