Literature DB >> 25644305

Bayesian Assessment of Genetic Risk in Families with a Balanced Translocation.

Douglas VanDerwerken1.   

Abstract

An important problem from the field of genetics involves the calculation of a personalized risk estimate on behalf of a heterozygous carrier of a balanced translocation. Though phenotypically normal, the carrier may be at increased risk of having a child who is mentally and physically abnormal due to an unbalanced translocation of chromosomal segments. An accurate estimate of the probability of this event is understandably desirable. Unfortunately, translocations are almost always family-specific so there is very little data that are perfectly relevant and one has to rely heavily on general risk figures derived from studies of families with similar translocations. This makes the problem particularly well suited to Bayesian analysis, which coherently combines family-specific data and a priori knowledge. However, much of the genetics counseling literature recommends an either/or approach: if the family is large enough, use family data; else, use pooled population data. In this article, we describe how uncertainty can be significantly reduced by incorporating all available information in the context of deriving a risk estimate for a hypothetical familial translocation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25644305     DOI: 10.1007/s10897-015-9821-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Genet Couns        ISSN: 1059-7700            Impact factor:   2.537


  11 in total

Review 1.  Partial trisomy 20p: familial occurrence.

Authors:  S Oppenheimer; P Dignan; S Soukup
Journal:  Am J Med Genet       Date:  2000-12-11

2.  Segregation of a t(1;3) translocation in multiple affected family members with both types of adjacent-1 segregants.

Authors:  Chahira Kozma; Anne M Slavotinek; Jeanne M Meck
Journal:  Am J Med Genet A       Date:  2004-01-15       Impact factor: 2.802

Review 3.  Bayesian analysis and risk assessment in genetic counseling and testing.

Authors:  Shuji Ogino; Robert B Wilson
Journal:  J Mol Diagn       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 5.568

4.  Experiences with risk estimates for carriers of chromosomal reciprocal translocations.

Authors:  A T Midro; S Stengel-Rutkowski; J Stene
Journal:  Clin Genet       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 4.438

5.  A Simple, Unified Approach to Bayesian Risk Calculations.

Authors:  S E Hodge
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 2.537

6.  Human reciprocal translocations: is the unbalanced mode at birth predictable?

Authors:  C Cans; O Cohen; M A Mermet; J Demongeot; P Jalbert
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 4.132

Review 7.  Viability thresholds for partial trisomies and monosomies. A study of 1,159 viable unbalanced reciprocal translocations.

Authors:  O Cohen; C Cans; M A Mermet; J Demongeot; P Jalbert
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  1994-02       Impact factor: 4.132

8.  Reciprocal translocations: a way to predict the mode of imbalanced segregation by pachytene-diagram drawing.

Authors:  P Jalbert; B Sele; H Jalbert
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  1980       Impact factor: 4.132

Review 9.  The clinical implementation of sperm chromosome aneuploidy testing: pitfalls and promises.

Authors:  Douglas T Carrell
Journal:  J Androl       Date:  2007-09-19

10.  Partial trisomy 3p syndrome.

Authors:  J A Reiss; L J Sheffield; G R Sutherland
Journal:  Clin Genet       Date:  1986-07       Impact factor: 4.438

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.