OBJECTIVE: Deficits in executive function (EF)-including inhibitory control, cognitive flexibility, decision-making, and working memory-may be risk or maintenance factors for binge eating disorder (BED). However, there is mixed evidence regarding EF deficits in individuals with BED. Significant methodological weaknesses (e.g., use of a single EF measure, omission of relevant covariates) in the current literature represent one reason for lack of consensus. METHOD: This study compared EF in a sample of overweight women with (n = 31) and without (n = 43) full or subthreshold BED, with the aim of conducting a multifaceted investigation of the neurocognitive profile of BED. A neuropsychological battery of EF was administered to all participants. RESULTS: After controlling for IQ and age, individuals with binge eating displayed significantly poorer performance on tasks of problem-solving and inhibitory control, and displayed higher prioritization of immediate versus delayed rewards, but the two groups did not appear to differ on set-shifting, working memory, and risk taking. Differences in inhibitory control were no longer statistically significant when depressive symptomology was added as a covariate and correction for multiple comparisons was applied. Exploratory analyses indicated that full and sub-threshold BED groups did not differ in EF. DISCUSSION: Results partially support the hypothesis of relative EF deficits in individuals with BED, suggesting that binge eating may be maintained by cognitive factors distinct from those of obesity. Future research should aim to replicate with a larger sample, control for a wider range of psychiatric comorbidities, and examine whether EF deficits predict treatment outcome.
OBJECTIVE: Deficits in executive function (EF)-including inhibitory control, cognitive flexibility, decision-making, and working memory-may be risk or maintenance factors for binge eating disorder (BED). However, there is mixed evidence regarding EF deficits in individuals with BED. Significant methodological weaknesses (e.g., use of a single EF measure, omission of relevant covariates) in the current literature represent one reason for lack of consensus. METHOD: This study compared EF in a sample of overweight women with (n = 31) and without (n = 43) full or subthreshold BED, with the aim of conducting a multifaceted investigation of the neurocognitive profile of BED. A neuropsychological battery of EF was administered to all participants. RESULTS: After controlling for IQ and age, individuals with binge eating displayed significantly poorer performance on tasks of problem-solving and inhibitory control, and displayed higher prioritization of immediate versus delayed rewards, but the two groups did not appear to differ on set-shifting, working memory, and risk taking. Differences in inhibitory control were no longer statistically significant when depressive symptomology was added as a covariate and correction for multiple comparisons was applied. Exploratory analyses indicated that full and sub-threshold BED groups did not differ in EF. DISCUSSION: Results partially support the hypothesis of relative EF deficits in individuals with BED, suggesting that binge eating may be maintained by cognitive factors distinct from those of obesity. Future research should aim to replicate with a larger sample, control for a wider range of psychiatric comorbidities, and examine whether EF deficits predict treatment outcome.
Authors: F Van den Eynde; S Guillaume; H Broadbent; D Stahl; I C Campbell; U Schmidt; K Tchanturia Journal: Acta Psychiatr Scand Date: 2011-04-07 Impact factor: 6.392
Authors: Kate Tchanturia; Marija Brecelj Anderluh; Robin G Morris; Sophia Rabe-Hesketh; David A Collier; Patricia Sanchez; Janet L Treasure Journal: J Int Neuropsychol Soc Date: 2004-07 Impact factor: 2.892
Authors: J Daniel Ragland; Bruce I Turetsky; Ruben C Gur; Faith Gunning-Dixon; Travis Turner; Lee Schroeder; Robin Chan; Raquel E Gur Journal: Neuropsychology Date: 2002-07 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: L K G Hsu; B Mulliken; B McDonagh; S Krupa Das; W Rand; C G Fairburn; B Rolls; M A McCrory; E Saltzman; S Shikora; J Dwyer; S Roberts Journal: Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord Date: 2002-10
Authors: Michael Amlung; Emma Marsden; Katherine Holshausen; Vanessa Morris; Herry Patel; Lana Vedelago; Katherine R Naish; Derek D Reed; Randi E McCabe Journal: JAMA Psychiatry Date: 2019-11-01 Impact factor: 21.596
Authors: Andrea B Goldschmidt; Kathryn E Smith; Jason M Lavender; Scott G Engel; Alissa Haedt-Matt Journal: J Psychiatr Res Date: 2018-12-15 Impact factor: 4.791
Authors: Zaida Agüera; María Lozano-Madrid; Núria Mallorquí-Bagué; Susana Jiménez-Murcia; José M Menchón; Fernando Fernández-Aranda Journal: Neuropsychiatr Date: 2020-04-28
Authors: Christian Avila; Alison C Holloway; Margaret K Hahn; Katherine M Morrison; Maria Restivo; Rebecca Anglin; Valerie H Taylor Journal: Curr Obes Rep Date: 2015-09
Authors: Andrea B Goldschmidt; Setareh O'Brien; Jason M Lavender; Carolyn M Pearson; Daniel Le Grange; Scott J Hunter Journal: Appetite Date: 2017-03-18 Impact factor: 3.868
Authors: Meghan L Butryn; Mary K Martinelli; Jocelyn E Remmert; Savannah R Roberts; Fengqing Zhang; Evan M Forman; Stephanie M Manasse Journal: Ann Behav Med Date: 2019-08-29
Authors: Stephanie M Manasse; Elizabeth W Lampe; Lindsay Gillikin; Adam Payne-Reichert; Fengqing Zhang; Adrienne S Juarascio; Evan M Forman Journal: Int J Eat Disord Date: 2020-03-27 Impact factor: 4.861