| Literature DB >> 25643350 |
William H Morgan1, Anmar Abdul-Rahman2, Dao-Yi Yu1, Martin L Hazelton3, Brigid Betz-Stablein3, Christopher R P Lind4.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Retinal venous pulsation detection is a subjective sign, which varies in elevated intracranial pressure, venous obstruction and glaucoma. To date no method can objectively measure and identify pulsating regions.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2015 PMID: 25643350 PMCID: PMC4314073 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0116475
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Figure 1Schematic diagram of the technical sequence for objectively analysing the video frames, calculating pulsation amplitudes and generating heat maps of amplitude.
Figure 2A diagram showing 2 cluster waveforms from different optic disk regions over three cardiac cycles (A) with video frames taken during diastole (B) and systole (C).
A heat map with colour scale (D) is shown with observer 1 manual outline of pulsating region overlaid upon the heat map (E). Objective detection (F) with threshold amplitude set at 5 units is shown in yellow where this was in agreement with observer, in green without agreement from observer and in red where the observer noted pulsation but amplitude values were less than 5 units.
Average values of key parameters for each eye: AU-ROC = area under the receiver operator characteristic curve, Ideal Thresh = ideal threshold, Illum sd = image illumination variation and Tot Movt = maximum frame movement during video of three cardiac cycles.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 30 | r | 0.954 | 4.5 | 18.0 | 1.4 | 63.3 |
| 2 | 30 | l | 0.986 | 7 | 16.0 | 1.3 | 73.5 |
| 3 | 26 | r | 0.853 | 8 | 13.9 | 2.1 | 40.3 |
| 4 | 26 | l | 0.894 | 6 | 12.0 | 2.2 | 74.3 |
| 5 | 23 | r | 0.949 | 4.5 | 13.1 | 0.8 | 41.4 |
| 6 | 23 | l | 0.966 | 4 | 12.0 | 0.7 | 32.7 |
| 7 | 29 | l | 0.964 | 3 | 12.4 | 0.5 | 32.0 |
| 8 | 29 | r | 0.938 | 5 | 15.8 | 1.0 | 44.7 |
| 9 | 48 | l | 0.898 | 4 | 10.7 | 0.9 | 22.4 |
| 10 | 81 | l | 0.918 | 2 | 7.1 | 2.0 | 50.0 |
| 11 | 25 | r | 0.922 | 5.5 | 19.8 | 0.8 | 51.7 |
| 12 | 73 | r | 0.964 | 2.5 | 11.6 | 1.4 | 39.7 |
| 13 | 78 | l | 0.979 | 5 | 22.7 | 1.4 | 26.9 |
| 14 | 40 | l | 0.984 | 3.5 | 9.4 | 0.6 | 30.2 |
| 15 | 67 | r | 0.952 | 10 | 26.8 | 2.5 | 41.0 |
| 16 | 69 | r | 0.978 | 4 | 9.1 | 1.7 | 82.8 |
| 17 | 65 | r | 0.939 | 6 | 15.0 | 2.1 | 115.3 |
| 18 | 65 | l | 0.960 | 5 | 23.6 | 2.9 | 181.2 |
| 19 | 59 | r | 0.950 | 6 | 11.0 | 1.5 | 82.8 |
| 20 | 59 | l | 0.940 | 8.5 | 25.0 | 3.0 | 45.2 |
| 21 | 25 | l | 0.916 | 6.5 | 16.4 | 2.0 | 66.2 |
| 22 | 70 | l | 0.883 | 9.5 | 16.3 | 3.5 | 71.9 |
| 23 | 65 | r | 0.976 | 4 | 15.3 | 0.8 | 26.4 |
| 24 | 72 | r | 0.987 | 8.5 | 22.3 | 3.4 | 117.6 |
| 25 | 72 | l | 0.962 | 6 | 13.5 | 1.5 | 77.0 |
| 26 | 48 | r | 0.909 | 4 | 16.7 | 1.0 | 55.6 |
Figure 3Receiver operator curve for Observer 2 with all data from all eyes analysed together.