OBJECTIVE: Self-assessment deficits, often referred to as impaired insight or unawareness of illness, are well established in people with schizophrenia. There are multiple levels of awareness, including awareness of symptoms, functional deficits, cognitive impairments, and the ability to monitor cognitive and functional performance in an ongoing manner. The present study aimed to evaluate the comparative predictive value of each aspect of awareness on the levels of everyday functioning in people with schizophrenia. METHOD: We examined multiple aspects of self-assessment of functioning in 214 people with schizophrenia. We also collected information on everyday functioning rated by high contact clinicians and examined the importance of self-assessment for the prediction of real-world functional outcomes. The relative impact of performance-based measures of cognition, functional capacity, and metacognitive performance on everyday functioning was also examined. RESULTS: Misestimation of ability emerged as the strongest predictor of real-world functioning and exceeded the influences of cognitive performance, functional capacity performance, and performance-based assessment of metacognitive monitoring. The relative contribution of the factors other than self-assessment varied according to which domain of everyday functioning was being examined, but, in all cases, accounted for less predictive variance. CONCLUSION: These results underscore the functional impact of misestimating one's current functioning and relative level of ability. These findings are consistent with the use of insight-focused treatments and compensatory strategies designed to increase self-awareness in multiple functional domains. (c) 2015 APA, all rights reserved).
OBJECTIVE: Self-assessment deficits, often referred to as impaired insight or unawareness of illness, are well established in people with schizophrenia. There are multiple levels of awareness, including awareness of symptoms, functional deficits, cognitive impairments, and the ability to monitor cognitive and functional performance in an ongoing manner. The present study aimed to evaluate the comparative predictive value of each aspect of awareness on the levels of everyday functioning in people with schizophrenia. METHOD: We examined multiple aspects of self-assessment of functioning in 214 people with schizophrenia. We also collected information on everyday functioning rated by high contact clinicians and examined the importance of self-assessment for the prediction of real-world functional outcomes. The relative impact of performance-based measures of cognition, functional capacity, and metacognitive performance on everyday functioning was also examined. RESULTS: Misestimation of ability emerged as the strongest predictor of real-world functioning and exceeded the influences of cognitive performance, functional capacity performance, and performance-based assessment of metacognitive monitoring. The relative contribution of the factors other than self-assessment varied according to which domain of everyday functioning was being examined, but, in all cases, accounted for less predictive variance. CONCLUSION: These results underscore the functional impact of misestimating one's current functioning and relative level of ability. These findings are consistent with the use of insight-focused treatments and compensatory strategies designed to increase self-awareness in multiple functional domains. (c) 2015 APA, all rights reserved).
Authors: Philip D Harvey; Masaaki Ogasa; Josephine Cucchiaro; Antony Loebel; Richard S E Keefe Journal: Schizophr Res Date: 2011-01-31 Impact factor: 4.939
Authors: Richard S E Keefe; Kolleen Hurley Fox; Philip D Harvey; Josephine Cucchiaro; Cynthia Siu; Antony Loebel Journal: Schizophr Res Date: 2010-12-31 Impact factor: 4.939
Authors: Michael F Green; Nina R Schooler; Robert S Kern; Fred J Frese; Wendy Granberry; Philip D Harvey; Craig N Karson; Nancy Peters; Michelle Stewart; Larry J Seidman; John Sonnenberg; William S Stone; David Walling; Ellen Stover; Stephen R Marder Journal: Am J Psychiatry Date: 2011-02-01 Impact factor: 18.112
Authors: Paul H Lysaker; Giancarlo Dimaggio; Kelly D Buck; Stephanie S Callaway; Gimapaolo Salvatore; Antonino Carcione; Giuseppe Nicolò; Giovanni Stanghellini Journal: Compr Psychiatry Date: 2011 May-Jun Impact factor: 3.735
Authors: Anne-Kathrin J Fett; Wolfgang Viechtbauer; Maria-de-Gracia Dominguez; David L Penn; Jim van Os; Lydia Krabbendam Journal: Neurosci Biobehav Rev Date: 2010-07-08 Impact factor: 8.989
Authors: Samir Sabbag; Elizabeth M Twamley; Lea Vella; Robert K Heaton; Thomas L Patterson; Philip D Harvey Journal: Schizophr Res Date: 2011-05-26 Impact factor: 4.939
Authors: Philip D Harvey; Elizabeth Deckler; Mackenzie T Jones; L Fredrik Jarskog; David L Penn; Amy E Pinkham Journal: J Psychiatr Res Date: 2019-05-10 Impact factor: 4.791
Authors: Lisa C Obermeit; Jessica Beltran; Kaitlin B Casaletto; Donald R Franklin; Scott Letendre; Ronald Ellis; Christine Fennema-Notestine; Florin Vaida; Ann C Collier; Christina M Marra; David Clifford; Benjamin Gelman; Ned Sacktor; Susan Morgello; David Simpson; J Allen McCutchan; Igor Grant; Robert K Heaton Journal: J Neurovirol Date: 2016-08-24 Impact factor: 2.643
Authors: Isabelle Lanser; Julia Browne; Amy E Pinkham; Philip D Harvey; L Fredrik Jarskog; David L Penn Journal: Psychiatry Res Date: 2018-08-15 Impact factor: 3.222
Authors: Philip D Harvey; Elizabeth W Twamley; Amy E Pinkham; Colin A Depp; Thomas L Patterson Journal: Schizophr Bull Date: 2017-05-01 Impact factor: 9.306
Authors: Marc Kalin; Sara Kaplan; Felicia Gould; Amy E Pinkham; David L Penn; Philip D Harvey Journal: J Psychiatr Res Date: 2015-07-13 Impact factor: 4.791
Authors: Lisa N Oliveri; Adam W Awerbuch; L Fredrik Jarskog; David L Penn; Amy Pinkham; Philip D Harvey Journal: Psychiatry Res Date: 2019-11-06 Impact factor: 3.222