Literature DB >> 25642426

Anticipatory Deaccenting in Language Comprehension.

Kathleen Carbary1, Meredith Brown2, Christine Gunlogson3, Joyce M McDonough3, Aleksandra Fazlipour3, Michael K Tanenhaus3.   

Abstract

We evaluated the hypothesis that listeners can generate expectations about upcoming input using anticipatory deaccenting, in which the absence of a nuclear pitch accent on an utterance-new noun is licensed by the subsequent repetition of that noun (e.g. Drag the SQUARE with the house to the TRIangle with the house). The phonemic restoration paradigm was modified to obscure word-initial segmental information uniquely identifying the final word in a spoken instruction, resulting in a stimulus compatible with two lexical alternatives (e.g. mouse/house). In Experiment 1, we measured participants' final interpretations and response times. Experiment 2 used the same materials in a crowd-sourced gating study. Sentence interpretations at gated intervals, final interpretations, and response times provided converging evidence that the anticipatory deaccenting pattern contributed to listeners' referential expectations. The results illustrate the availability and importance of sentence-level accent patterns in spoken language comprehension.

Entities:  

Keywords:  deaccenting; language comprehension; phoneme restoration; prosody; sentence gating

Year:  2015        PMID: 25642426      PMCID: PMC4309389          DOI: 10.1080/23273798.2014.885534

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lang Cogn Neurosci        ISSN: 2327-3798            Impact factor:   2.331


  9 in total

1.  False-positive psychology: undisclosed flexibility in data collection and analysis allows presenting anything as significant.

Authors:  Joseph P Simmons; Leif D Nelson; Uri Simonsohn
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2011-10-17

2.  Anticipatory effects of intonation: Eye movements during instructed visual search.

Authors:  Kiwako Ito; Shari R Speer
Journal:  J Mem Lang       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 3.059

3.  Focus, accent, and argument structure: effects on language comprehension.

Authors:  S Birch; C Clifton
Journal:  Lang Speech       Date:  1995 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 1.500

4.  Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal.

Authors:  Dale J Barr; Roger Levy; Christoph Scheepers; Harry J Tily
Journal:  J Mem Lang       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 3.059

5.  Interpreting Pitch Accents in Online Comprehension: H* vs. L+H*.

Authors:  Duane G Watson; Michael K Tanenhaus; Christine A Gunlogson
Journal:  Cogn Sci       Date:  2008-10

6.  Perceptual restoration of missing speech sounds.

Authors:  R M Warren
Journal:  Science       Date:  1970-01-23       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  Phonemic restoration: insights from a new methodology.

Authors:  A G Samuel
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  1981-12

8.  (Not) Hearing Optional Subjects: The Effects of Pragmatic Usage Preferences.

Authors:  Jennifer E Mack; Charles Clifton; Lyn Frazier; Patrick V Taylor
Journal:  J Mem Lang       Date:  2012-03-20       Impact factor: 3.059

9.  Immediate effects of anticipatory coarticulation in spoken-word recognition.

Authors:  Anne Pier Salverda; Dave Kleinschmidt; Michael K Tanenhaus
Journal:  J Mem Lang       Date:  2014-02-01       Impact factor: 3.059

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.