| Literature DB >> 25642084 |
Dong-Kyu Lee1, Jun-Seok Kim2, Tae-Hoon Kim3, Jae-Seop Oh4.
Abstract
[Purpose] The purpose of this study was to compare the EMG activity of the tibialis anterior (TA) and gastrocnemius (GCM) during the downward, maintenance, and upward phases of the squat exercise and during passive ankle dorsiflexion range of motion between stroke patients and healthy subjects. [Subjects] Fifteen hemiplegic (8 males, 7 females) and 15 healthy subjects (4 males, 11 females) volunteered for this study. [Methods] All subjects performed a double-leg squat exercise with the knee joint flexed to 30°. Surface electromyography (EMG) signals were recorded from the TA and GCM on the paretic or nondominant side. Passive ankle dorsiflexion range of motion (DF PROM) was measured using a goniometer in the knee-extended prone position.Entities:
Keywords: EMG; Squat exercise; Stroke
Year: 2015 PMID: 25642084 PMCID: PMC4305574 DOI: 10.1589/jpts.27.247
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Phys Ther Sci ISSN: 0915-5287
EMG activity (%RVC) of the tibialis anterior and gastrocnemius during squat
| Stroke (n=15) | Healthy (n=15) | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Downward | TA | 330.8 ± 181.9* | 207.8 ± 74.4 |
| GCM | 132.3 ± 51.3 | 168.7 ± 112.3 | |
| Maintenance | TA | 346.7 ± 229.7* | 199.8 ± 68.7 |
| GCM | 138.8 ± 54.6 | 155.0 ± 94.9 | |
| Upward | TA | 292.5 ± 190.1 | 200.6 ± 73.3 |
| GCM | 179.2 ± 63.8* | 300.3 ± 204.9 | |
Data are expressed as the mean ± SD. TA: tibialis anterior, GCM: gastrocnemius. *p < 0.05
Differences in passive dorsiflexion range of motion between the two groups (°)
| Stroke (n=15) | Healthy (n=15) | |
|---|---|---|
| DF ROM | 10.4 ± 1.8* | 20.2 ± 2.1 |
Data are expressed as the mean ± SD. DF ROM: differences in passive dorsiflexion range of motion between the two groups (°). *p < 0.05