Literature DB >> 25641732

Forced extinction of CD24 stem-like breast cancer marker alone promotes radiation resistance through the control of oxidative stress.

Julie Bensimon1, Denis Biard2, Vincent Paget1, Maud Goislard1, Sandrine Morel-Altmeyer1, Julie Konge1, Sylvie Chevillard1, Jérôme Lebeau1.   

Abstract

Along with CD44, CD24 is a key marker of breast cancer stem cells (CSCs), frequently defined by CD24(-)/CD44(+) labeling. Among all phenotypes classically attributed to breast CD24(-)/CD44(+) cancer cells, radiation resistance has been extensively described and seen as being implicated in radiotherapy failure. Our previous data indicated that CD24(-) cells constitute a radiation-resistant subpopulation transitory selected by high doses of ionizing radiation. However, little is known about the biological role of CD24 in breast cancers, and no function has been assigned to CD24 in radiation response. Here, CD24 expression was induced in CD24(-) cells or knocked-down in CD24(+) cells. We show that forced extinction of CD24 expression is associated with decreased proliferation rate, lower levels of reactive oxygen species (ROS) and decreased genomic instability. On the opposite when CD24 is artificially expressed in CD24(-) cells, proliferation rates in vitro and in vivo, ROS levels and genomic instability are enhanced. Moreover, we observe that loss of CD24 expression leads to radiation resistance, by preventing radiation-induced cell death and promoting generation of progeny in relation to lower G2/M blockade and a smaller proportion of polyploid cells. Finally, control of ROS levels appears to be the key event in the CD24-mediated radiation response. For the first time, CD24 is proposed as a direct actor in radiation response of breast cancer cells, independently of CD44 expression. These findings could have interesting applications in evaluating the intrinsic radiation response of primary tumors.
© 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CD24; breast cancer; genomic instability; irradiation; oxidative stress

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25641732     DOI: 10.1002/mc.22273

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Carcinog        ISSN: 0899-1987            Impact factor:   4.784


  8 in total

1.  Evaluation of the effect of hyperthermia and electron radiation on prostate cancer stem cells.

Authors:  Zhila Rajaee; Samideh Khoei; Seied Rabi Mahdavi; Marzieh Ebrahimi; Sakine Shirvalilou; Alireza Mahdavian
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2018-02-17       Impact factor: 1.925

2.  A novel animal model of impaired glucose tolerance induced by the interaction of vitamin E deficiency and (60)Co radiation.

Authors:  Yue Guan; Yan Cheng; Ying Yin; Jialin Duan; Guo Wei; Yan Weng; Chao Guo; Yanrong Zhu; Yanhua Wang; Miaomiao Xi; Aidong Wen
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2015-04-14       Impact factor: 3.411

3.  Breast cancer stem cell-like cells generated during TGFβ-induced EMT are radioresistant.

Authors:  Sylvie Chevillard; Jérôme Lebeau; Julie Konge; François Leteurtre; Maud Goislard; Denis Biard; Sandrine Morel-Altmeyer; Aurélie Vaurijoux; Gaetan Gruel
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2018-05-04

4.  Expression of Androgen Receptor and Cancer Stem Cell Markers (CD44+/CD24- and ALDH1+): Prognostic Implications in Invasive Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Nazia Riaz; Romana Idress; Sadia Habib; Iqbal Azam; El-Nasir Ma Lalani
Journal:  Transl Oncol       Date:  2018-05-31       Impact factor: 4.243

Review 5.  Spices for Prevention and Treatment of Cancers.

Authors:  Jie Zheng; Yue Zhou; Ya Li; Dong-Ping Xu; Sha Li; Hua-Bin Li
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2016-08-12       Impact factor: 5.717

Review 6.  Reactive Oxygen Species-Mediated Tumor Microenvironment Transformation: The Mechanism of Radioresistant Gastric Cancer.

Authors:  Huifeng Gu; Tianhe Huang; Yicheng Shen; Yin Liu; Fuling Zhou; Yanxia Jin; Haseeb Sattar; Yongchang Wei
Journal:  Oxid Med Cell Longev       Date:  2018-03-27       Impact factor: 6.543

Review 7.  Adverse outcome pathways for ionizing radiation and breast cancer involve direct and indirect DNA damage, oxidative stress, inflammation, genomic instability, and interaction with hormonal regulation of the breast.

Authors:  Jessica S Helm; Ruthann A Rudel
Journal:  Arch Toxicol       Date:  2020-05-13       Impact factor: 5.153

8.  Transcriptome Analysis Identifies Novel Mechanisms Associated with the Antitumor Effect of Chitosan-Stabilized Selenium Nanoparticles.

Authors:  Hector Estevez; Estefania Garcia-Calvo; Jose Rivera-Torres; María Vallet-Regí; Blanca González; Jose L Luque-Garcia
Journal:  Pharmaceutics       Date:  2021-03-08       Impact factor: 6.321

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.