Literature DB >> 25641318

Can the signal-to-noise ratio of choline in magnetic resonance spectroscopy reflect the aggressiveness of endometrial cancer?

Xue Han1, Jingxia Kang2, Jie Zhang1, Jianjun Xiu1, Zhaoqin Huang1, Chunrun Yang3, Xichao Sun4, Caixia Fu5, Qingwei Liu6.   

Abstract

RATIONALE AND
OBJECTIVES: To differentiate endometrial cancer (ECa) from benign lesions in endometrial or in submucosa (BLs-ESm), and investigate whether the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) of choline-containing compounds (Cho) obtained from three-dimensional (1)H magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS) is associated with the aggressiveness of ECa.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-three patients with ECa and 15 patients with BLs-ESm underwent preoperative multivoxel (1)H MRS at 3 T MR. The amplitude of Cho peak of each voxel was recorded, and the corresponding SNR of Cho peak (ChoSNR) was calculated. The maximum ChoSNR (max ChoSNR) for each lesion was identified. The max ChoSNR of ECa and BLs-ESm, as well as type I ECa and type II ECa, was compared. The relationship between max ChoSNR and pathologic characteristics of tumors, including tumor grade, stage, type, and tumor size, was analyzed.
RESULTS: The mean max ChoSNR (±standard deviation [SD]) was 30.93 ± 16.89 for ECa and 10.40 ± 3.07 for BLs-ESm (P < .001). The mean max ChoSNR for type II ECa (48.54 ± 21.46) was higher than that for type I ECa (26.19 ± 12.02, P = .001). There were no significant differences among different grades (P = .449). The Spearman coefficient between max ChoSNR and stage was 0.423 (P = .014); the difference existed only between Ia and III ECa (P = .048). The Pearson coefficient between ChoSNR and tumor size was 0.515 (P = .002).
CONCLUSIONS: The max ChoSNR obtained from MRS can differentiate ECa from BLs and type I ECa and type II ECa, but cannot differentiate between each grade ECa and each International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage ECa. However, max ChoSNR increased with the increase in International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage and size of ECa.
Copyright © 2015 AUR. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Endometrial cancer; aggressiveness; choline; magnetic resonance imaging; magnetic resonance spectroscopy

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25641318     DOI: 10.1016/j.acra.2014.12.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acad Radiol        ISSN: 1076-6332            Impact factor:   3.173


  3 in total

1.  Magnetic resonance spectroscopy associations with clinicopathologic features of estrogen-dependent endometrial cancer.

Authors:  Jie Zhang; Qingwei Liu; Jie Li; Zhiling Liu; Ximing Wang; Na Li; Zhaoqin Huang; Han Xu
Journal:  BMC Med Imaging       Date:  2022-07-18       Impact factor: 2.795

Review 2.  What Is the Best Preoperative Imaging for Endometrial Cancer?

Authors:  Ingfrid S Haldorsen; Helga B Salvesen
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 5.075

Review 3.  Current Status of Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Patients with Malignant Uterine Neoplasms: A Review.

Authors:  Yu-Ting Huang; Yen-Ling Huang; Koon-Kwan Ng; Gigin Lin
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2018-12-27       Impact factor: 3.500

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.