Literature DB >> 25640772

Evaluating developmental motor plasticity with paired afferent stimulation.

Omar Damji1,2,3, Jamie Keess2,3, Adam Kirton2,3,4.   

Abstract

AIM: Brain plasticity mechanisms are probably different in children but remain poorly understood. Paired afferent stimulation (PAS) combines peripheral sensory stimulation with transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) of primary motor cortex to induce rapid, reversible, topographically specific increases in primary motor cortex excitability suggestive of long-term potentiation in adults. Our aim was to determine frequency, characteristics, age effects, and reproducibility of PAS in school-age children.
METHOD: Typically developing right-handed children (6-18y) were recruited. Median nerve stimulation was delivered 25ms before suprathreshold primary motor cortex stimulation (0.2Hz, 7.5min). Primary outcome was changed in the amplitude of motor evoked potentials (MEPs) at five time points after PAS (0, 15, 30, 45, 75min) expressed as area under the curve. Reproducibility was evaluated. Secondary outcomes included stimulus response curves and safety/tolerability.
RESULTS: Of 28 children (20 males, mean age 12y), 64% demonstrated PAS effects (11 definite, seven probable). PAS effects were sustained across all time points to 75min (p=0.004). Stimulus response curve scores increased after PAS (n=9, p=0.02). PAS effect and age were not correlated. PAS was highly reproducible (p=0.925, r=0.283). Tolerability was favorable without adverse events.
INTERPRETATION: PAS effects are present and reproducible in children. Pediatric PAS paradigms appear safe and tolerable. PAS may provide insight into endogenous developmental plasticity, informing future studies in children with cerebral palsy and other motor disorders.
© 2015 Mac Keith Press.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25640772     DOI: 10.1111/dmcn.12704

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dev Med Child Neurol        ISSN: 0012-1622            Impact factor:   5.449


  7 in total

Review 1.  Safety of Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in Children: A Systematic Review of the Literature.

Authors:  Corey H Allen; Benzi M Kluger; Isabelle Buard
Journal:  Pediatr Neurol       Date:  2017-01-04       Impact factor: 3.372

2.  Pediatric Neuromodulation Comes of Age.

Authors:  Paul E Croarkin; Alexander Rotenberg
Journal:  J Child Adolesc Psychopharmacol       Date:  2016-09-07       Impact factor: 2.576

Review 3.  Transcranial Magnetic and Direct Current Stimulation in Children.

Authors:  Mustafa Q Hameed; Sameer C Dhamne; Roman Gersner; Harper L Kaye; Lindsay M Oberman; Alvaro Pascual-Leone; Alexander Rotenberg
Journal:  Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 5.081

4.  Paired-Associative Stimulation-Induced Long-term Potentiation-Like Motor Cortex Plasticity in Healthy Adolescents.

Authors:  Jonathan C Lee; Paul E Croarkin; Stephanie H Ameis; Yinming Sun; Daniel M Blumberger; Tarek K Rajji; Zafiris J Daskalakis
Journal:  Front Psychiatry       Date:  2017-05-29       Impact factor: 4.157

5.  Corticospinal Tract Wiring and Brain Lesion Characteristics in Unilateral Cerebral Palsy: Determinants of Upper Limb Motor and Sensory Function.

Authors:  Cristina Simon-Martinez; Ellen Jaspers; Lisa Mailleux; Els Ortibus; Katrijn Klingels; Nicole Wenderoth; Hilde Feys
Journal:  Neural Plast       Date:  2018-09-13       Impact factor: 3.599

6.  Abnormal Cortical Plasticity in Youth with Autism Spectrum Disorder: A Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Case-Control Pilot Study.

Authors:  Ernest V Pedapati; Donald L Gilbert; Craig A Erickson; Paul S Horn; Rebecca C Shaffer; Logan K Wink; Cameron S Laue; Steve W Wu
Journal:  J Child Adolesc Psychopharmacol       Date:  2016-03-23       Impact factor: 3.031

Review 7.  Sensorimotor Integration in Childhood Dystonia and Dystonic Cerebral Palsy-A Developmental Perspective.

Authors:  Verity M McClelland; Jean-Pierre Lin
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2021-07-23       Impact factor: 4.003

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.