Literature DB >> 25640648

Current Use of Imaging after Primary Treatment of Prostate Cancer.

Ahmed A Hussein1, Sanoj Punnen2, Shoujun Zhao2, Janet E Cowan2, Michael Leapman2, Thanh C Tran2, Samuel L Washington2, Matthew D Truesdale2, Peter R Carroll2, Matthew R Cooperberg3.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Data are limited on imaging after primary treatment of localized prostate cancer.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We identified 8,435 men newly diagnosed with nonmetastatic prostate cancer in 1995 to 2012 who were enrolled in CaPSURE™. Patients were followed after primary treatment with radical prostatectomy, cryosurgery, brachytherapy, external beam radiation therapy or androgen deprivation therapy. We assessed the use of bone scan, computerized tomography and magnetic resonance imaging after primary treatment. Factors associated with posttreatment outcomes (number of imaging tests, and time to first imaging and salvage treatment) were evaluated with multivariate Poisson regression and Cox proportional hazards regression.
RESULTS: The incidence of posttreatment bone scan, computerized tomography and magnetic resonance imaging was 20% or less. Last posttreatment log(prostate specific antigen) was associated with multiple posttreatment imaging. Management by radical prostatectomy, cryosurgery, external beam radiation therapy or brachytherapy vs androgen deprivation therapy was associated with a lower likelihood of posttreatment imaging. Of patients who were imaged after treatment 25% with radical prostatectomy and 9% with radiation underwent imaging before prostate specific antigen failure. The 5-year salvage treatment-free survival rate was 81%. Positive findings on posttreatment imaging were associated with a higher risk of salvage treatment.
CONCLUSIONS: Patients treated with androgen deprivation therapy for localized disease were most likely to be imaged, primarily by bone scan. Men treated with other therapies were less likely to be imaged and tended to undergo computerized tomography. Imaging may add value to posttreatment prostate specific antigen monitoring to identify disease recurrence and progression. Further studies are needed to establish guidelines for the optimal frequency and imaging type to monitor the treatment response.
Copyright © 2015 American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  diagnostic imaging; disease progression; prostate-specific antigen; prostatic neoplasms; salvage therapy

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25640648     DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2015.01.097

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  2 in total

1.  Prostate cancer: Post-treatment imaging-a desperate need for solid evidence.

Authors:  Olivier Rouvière
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2015-04-28       Impact factor: 14.432

2.  Characterising potential bone scan overuse amongst men treated with radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Peter S Kirk; Tudor Borza; Megan E V Caram; Dean A Shumway; Danil V Makarov; Jennifer A Burns; Jeremy B Shelton; John T Leppert; Christina Chapman; Michael Chang; Brent K Hollenbeck; Ted A Skolarus
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2018-11-12       Impact factor: 5.588

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.