Literature DB >> 25640457

Acute hemodynamic effects of single- and dual-site left ventricular pacing employing a dual cathodal coronary sinus lead.

Berry M van Gelder1, Frank A Bracke.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: We studied the acute hemodynamic effect of left ventricular (LV) pacing from a dual cathodal coronary sinus (CS) lead in a both single- and dual-site electrode configuration.
METHODS: In 17 patients who underwent implantation of a cardiac resynchronization therapy-defibrillator system with dual cathodal CS leads, LV stimulation was performed from the distal and proximal electrode separately and from both electrodes simultaneously. The acute hemodynamic response was evaluated by invasive measurement of LVdP/dtmax. Timing of LV electrical activation time measured from onset QRS to LV sense during intrinsic rhythm at both electrodes were determined from simultaneous intracardiac recordings. The latter results were compared to those of an additional group of 26 patients in whom no hemodynamic effects were evaluated.
RESULTS: Baseline LVdP/dtmax was 897 ± 222 mm Hg/s. Single-site LV pacing resulted in a rise of LVdP/dtmax to 1,053 ± 266 mm Hg/s (+17.4%) taking the best of the two sites and 1,020 ± 254 mm Hg (+13.7%) at the worst site (P = 0.0001). In the dual-site pacing configuration LVdP/dtmax was 1,026 ± 243 mm Hg/s (+14.1%). P value for single best versus dual site was 0.005, and for dual site versus worst single site was 0.18 (n.s.).
CONCLUSION: Even with a relatively small distance of 20-21 mm between stimulation electrodes, there is a significant difference in acute hemodynamic effect from the single best and worst site. Dual-site LV pacing offers no hemodynamic benefit over the best single pacing site. The short electrode distance may have been a limitation and results may not be applicable to other forms of multisite pacing. ©2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cardiac resynchronization therapy; dual cathodal coronary sinus leads; electrode distance; hemodynamic effects; multisite pacing; single-site pacing

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25640457     DOI: 10.1111/pace.12606

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol        ISSN: 0147-8389            Impact factor:   1.976


  5 in total

1.  Optimization of CRT programming using non-invasive electrocardiographic imaging to assess the acute electrical effects of multipoint pacing.

Authors:  Benjamin J Sieniewicz; Tom Jackson; Simon Claridge; Helder Pereira; Justin Gould; Baldeep Sidhu; Bradley Porter; Steve Niederer; Cheng Yao; Christopher A Rinaldi
Journal:  J Arrhythm       Date:  2019-01-14

2.  Comparison of Echocardiographic and Electrocardiographic Mapping for Cardiac Resynchronisation Therapy Optimisation.

Authors:  Helder Pereira; Tom A Jackson; Simon Claridge; Jonathan M Behar; Cheng Yao; Benjamin Sieniewicz; Justin Gould; Bradley Porter; Baldeep Sidhu; Jaswinder Gill; Steven Niederer; Christopher A Rinaldi
Journal:  Cardiol Res Pract       Date:  2019-02-21       Impact factor: 1.866

3.  Cardiac resynchronization in Poland - comparable procedural routines? Insights from CRT Survey II.

Authors:  Mateusz Tajstra; Damian Łasocha; Elżbieta Gadula-Gacek; Mateusz Ostręga; Lidia Michalak; Dariusz Wojciechowski; Marek Zieliński; Maciej Kempa; Zbigniew Orski; Anna Polewczyk; Jerzy Ozga; Camilla Normand; Kenneth Dickstein; Cecilia Linde; Jarosław Kaźmierczak; Łukasz Szumowski; Mariusz Gąsior; Maciej Sterliński
Journal:  Postepy Kardiol Interwencyjnej       Date:  2019-12-08       Impact factor: 1.426

4.  In Heart Failure Patients with Left Bundle Branch Block Single Lead MultiSpot Left Ventricular Pacing Does Not Improve Acute Hemodynamic Response To Conventional Biventricular Pacing. A Multicenter Prospective, Interventional, Non-Randomized Study.

Authors:  Maciej Sterliński; Adam Sokal; Radosław Lenarczyk; Frederic Van Heuverswyn; C Aldo Rinaldi; Marc Vanderheyden; Vladimir Khalameizer; Darrel Francis; Joeri Heynens; Berthold Stegemann; Richard Cornelussen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-04-28       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  A multicenter prospective randomized controlled trial of cardiac resynchronization therapy guided by invasive dP/dt.

Authors:  Manav Sohal; Shoaib Hamid; Giovanni Perego; Paolo Della Bella; Shaumik Adhya; John Paisey; Tim Betts; Ravi Kamdar; Pier Lambiase; Francisco Leyva; Janet M McComb; Jonathan Behar; Thomas Jackson; Simon Claridge; Vishal Mehta; Mark Elliott; Steven Niederer; Reza Razavi; C Aldo Rinaldi
Journal:  Heart Rhythm O2       Date:  2021-01-22
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.