Literature DB >> 25640123

Screen-printed electrode based electrochemical detector coupled with ionic liquid dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction and microvolume back-extraction for determination of mercury in water samples.

Elena Fernández1, Lorena Vidal2, Daniel Martín-Yerga3, María del Carmen Blanco3, Antonio Canals4, Agustín Costa-García3.   

Abstract

A novel approach is presented, whereby gold nanostructured screen-printed carbon electrodes (SPCnAuEs) are combined with in-situ ionic liquid formation dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction (in-situ IL-DLLME) and microvolume back-extraction for the determination of mercury in water samples. In-situ IL-DLLME is based on a simple metathesis reaction between a water-miscible IL and a salt to form a water-immiscible IL into sample solution. Mercury complex with ammonium pyrrolidinedithiocarbamate is extracted from sample solution into the water-immiscible IL formed in-situ. Then, an ultrasound-assisted procedure is employed to back-extract the mercury into 10 µL of a 4 M HCl aqueous solution, which is finally analyzed using SPCnAuEs. Sample preparation methodology was optimized using a multivariate optimization strategy. Under optimized conditions, a linear range between 0.5 and 10 µg L(-1) was obtained with a correlation coefficient of 0.997 for six calibration points. The limit of detection obtained was 0.2 µg L(-1), which is lower than the threshold value established by the Environmental Protection Agency and European Union (i.e., 2 µg L(-1) and 1 µg L(-1), respectively). The repeatability of the proposed method was evaluated at two different spiking levels (3 and 10 µg L(-1)) and a coefficient of variation of 13% was obtained in both cases. The performance of the proposed methodology was evaluated in real-world water samples including tap water, bottled water, river water and industrial wastewater. Relative recoveries between 95% and 108% were obtained.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction; Ionic liquid; Liquid-phase microextraction; Mercury; Screen-printed electrode; Water samples

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25640123     DOI: 10.1016/j.talanta.2014.11.069

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Talanta        ISSN: 0039-9140            Impact factor:   6.057


  4 in total

1.  Molecular Imprinted Based Quartz Crystal Microbalance Nanosensors for Mercury Detection.

Authors:  Sabina Hüseynli; Duygu Çimen; Nilay Bereli; Adil Denizli
Journal:  Glob Chall       Date:  2018-11-27

2.  Deep eutectic solvents as a new kind of dispersive solvent for dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction.

Authors:  Andrey Shishov; Natalia Volodina; Daria Nechaeva; Svetlana Gagarinova; Andrey Bulatov
Journal:  RSC Adv       Date:  2018-11-14       Impact factor: 3.361

Review 3.  Recent Developments in the Speciation and Determination of Mercury Using Various Analytical Techniques.

Authors:  Lakshmi Narayana Suvarapu; Sung-Ok Baek
Journal:  J Anal Methods Chem       Date:  2015-07-05       Impact factor: 2.193

Review 4.  Recent Studies on the Speciation and Determination of Mercury in Different Environmental Matrices Using Various Analytical Techniques.

Authors:  Lakshmi Narayana Suvarapu; Sung-Ok Baek
Journal:  Int J Anal Chem       Date:  2017-11-20       Impact factor: 1.885

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.