Shuhui Deng1, Yan Xu1, Gang An1, Weiwei Sui1, Dehui Zou1, Yaozhong Zhao1, Junyuan Qi1, Fei Li1, Mu Hao1, Lugui Qiu2. 1. State Key Laboratory of Experimental Hematology, Institute of Hematology & Blood Diseases Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College. 2. State Key Laboratory of Experimental Hematology, Institute of Hematology & Blood Diseases Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College. Electronic address: drqiu99@medmail.com.cn.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Multiple myeloma (MM) is a heterogeneous disease in which most patients have myeloma restricted to the bone marrow, and some patients develop extramedullary disease (EMD) at the time of diagnosis or during follow-up, and show different clinical characteristics and a dismal prognosis. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We studied 834 consecutive MM patients in a single center in China and compared clinical features of patients with and without EMD. RESULTS: In general, the prevalence of EMD was 4.8% at the time of diagnosis and 3.4% during follow-up, with a significant increase in recent years. MM patients with EMD at the time of diagnosis had remarkably greater prevalence of P53 deletion determined using fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) analysis (34.5% vs. 11.9%; P = .037) and higher level of lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) (P = .003) compared with patients without EMD. EMD relapse/progression during follow-up was correlated with EMD presentation at diagnosis, immunoglobulin (Ig)D subtype and P53 deletion in FISH analysis, but not previous treatment (thalidomide, bortizomib, or transplantation). With respect to prognosis, multivariate analysis showed that EMD was an independent adverse prognostic factor. The overall survival of patients with and without EMD at diagnosis were 16.5 and 40 months, respectively (P < .001), and the time to disease progression of the 2 groups was 11.5 and 25 months, respectively (P < .001). CONCLUSION: MM patients with EMD at the time of diagnosis showed remarkably greater prevalence of P53 deletion in FISH analysis and higher LDH levels. EMD relapse/progression was correlated with EMD presentation at diagnosis, IgD subtype, and P53 deletion in FISH analysis, but not previous exposure to new drugs or transplantation. The presence of EMD involvement negatively affected survival.
BACKGROUND:Multiple myeloma (MM) is a heterogeneous disease in which most patients have myeloma restricted to the bone marrow, and some patients develop extramedullary disease (EMD) at the time of diagnosis or during follow-up, and show different clinical characteristics and a dismal prognosis. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We studied 834 consecutive MMpatients in a single center in China and compared clinical features of patients with and without EMD. RESULTS: In general, the prevalence of EMD was 4.8% at the time of diagnosis and 3.4% during follow-up, with a significant increase in recent years. MMpatients with EMD at the time of diagnosis had remarkably greater prevalence of P53 deletion determined using fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) analysis (34.5% vs. 11.9%; P = .037) and higher level of lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) (P = .003) compared with patients without EMD. EMD relapse/progression during follow-up was correlated with EMD presentation at diagnosis, immunoglobulin (Ig)D subtype and P53 deletion in FISH analysis, but not previous treatment (thalidomide, bortizomib, or transplantation). With respect to prognosis, multivariate analysis showed that EMD was an independent adverse prognostic factor. The overall survival of patients with and without EMD at diagnosis were 16.5 and 40 months, respectively (P < .001), and the time to disease progression of the 2 groups was 11.5 and 25 months, respectively (P < .001). CONCLUSION:MMpatients with EMD at the time of diagnosis showed remarkably greater prevalence of P53 deletion in FISH analysis and higher LDH levels. EMD relapse/progression was correlated with EMD presentation at diagnosis, IgD subtype, and P53 deletion in FISH analysis, but not previous exposure to new drugs or transplantation. The presence of EMD involvement negatively affected survival.
Authors: L Kumar; R Gogi; A K Patel; A Mookerjee; R K Sahoo; P S Malik; A Sharma; S Thulkar; R Kumar; A Biswas; O D Sharma; R Gupta Journal: Bone Marrow Transplant Date: 2017-08-14 Impact factor: 5.483
Authors: Ana B Herrero; Elizabeta A Rojas; Irena Misiewicz-Krzeminska; Patryk Krzeminski; Norma C Gutiérrez Journal: Int J Mol Sci Date: 2016-11-30 Impact factor: 5.923
Authors: Eva Kriegova; Regina Fillerova; Jiri Minarik; Jakub Savara; Jirina Manakova; Anna Petrackova; Martin Dihel; Jana Balcarkova; Petra Krhovska; Tomas Pika; Petr Gajdos; Marek Behalek; Michal Vasinek; Tomas Papajik Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2021-07-19 Impact factor: 4.379
Authors: Martin Stork; Sabina Sevcikova; Jiri Minarik; Petra Krhovska; Jakub Radocha; Lenka Pospisilova; Lucie Brozova; Jiri Jarkovsky; Ivan Spicka; Jan Straub; Petr Pavlicek; Alexandra Jungova; Tomas Jelinek; Viera Sandecka; Vladimir Maisnar; Roman Hajek; Ludek Pour Journal: Br J Haematol Date: 2021-11-02 Impact factor: 8.615