Robyn Sysko1,2, Deborah R Glasofer1,2, Tom Hildebrandt3, Patrycja Klimek3, James E Mitchell4,5, Kelly C Berg6, Carol B Peterson6, Stephen A Wonderlich4,5, B Timothy Walsh1,2. 1. Division of Clinical Therapeutics, New York State Psychiatric Institute, New York City, New York. 2. Department of Psychiatry, College of Physicians and Surgeons of Columbia University, New York City, New York. 3. Eating and Weight Disorders Program, Department of Psychiatry, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York City, New York. 4. Department of Clinical Neuroscience, University of North Dakota School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Fargo, North Dakota. 5. Neuropsychiatric Research Institute, Fargo, North Dakota. 6. Department of Psychiatry, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Existing measures for DSM-IV eating disorder diagnoses have notable limitations, and there are important differences between DSM-IV and DSM-5 feeding and eating disorders. This study developed and validated a new semistructured interview, the Eating Disorders Assessment for DSM-5 (EDA-5). METHOD: Two studies evaluated the utility of the EDA-5. Study 1 compared the diagnostic validity of the EDA-5 with the Eating Disorder Examination (EDE) and evaluated the test-retest reliability of the new measure. Study 2 compared the diagnostic validity of an EDA-5 electronic application ("App") with clinician interview and self-reported assessments. RESULTS: In Study 1, the kappa for EDE and EDA-5 eating disorder diagnoses was 0.74 across all diagnoses (n = 64), with a range of κ = 0.65 for other specified feeding or eating disorder/unspecified feeding or eating disorder to κ = 0.90 for binge eating disorder. The EDA-5 test-retest kappa coefficient was 0.87 across diagnoses. For Study 2, clinical interview versus App conditions revealed a kappa of 0.83 for all eating disorder diagnoses (n = 71). Across individual diagnostic categories, kappas ranged from 0.56 for other specified feeding or eating disorder/unspecified feeding or eating disorder to 0.94 for BN. DISCUSSION: High rates of agreement were found between diagnoses by EDA-5 and the EDE, and EDA-5 and clinical interviews. Because this study supports the validity of the EDA-5 to generate DSM-5 eating disorders and the reliability of these diagnoses, the EDA-5 may be an option for the assessment of anorexia nervosa, bulimia nervosa, and binge eating disorder. Additional research is needed to evaluate the utility of the EDA-5 in assessing DSM-5 feeding disorders.
OBJECTIVE: Existing measures for DSM-IV eating disorder diagnoses have notable limitations, and there are important differences between DSM-IV and DSM-5 feeding and eating disorders. This study developed and validated a new semistructured interview, the Eating Disorders Assessment for DSM-5 (EDA-5). METHOD: Two studies evaluated the utility of the EDA-5. Study 1 compared the diagnostic validity of the EDA-5 with the Eating Disorder Examination (EDE) and evaluated the test-retest reliability of the new measure. Study 2 compared the diagnostic validity of an EDA-5 electronic application ("App") with clinician interview and self-reported assessments. RESULTS: In Study 1, the kappa for EDE and EDA-5eating disorder diagnoses was 0.74 across all diagnoses (n = 64), with a range of κ = 0.65 for other specified feeding or eating disorder/unspecified feeding or eating disorder to κ = 0.90 for binge eating disorder. The EDA-5 test-retest kappa coefficient was 0.87 across diagnoses. For Study 2, clinical interview versus App conditions revealed a kappa of 0.83 for all eating disorder diagnoses (n = 71). Across individual diagnostic categories, kappas ranged from 0.56 for other specified feeding or eating disorder/unspecified feeding or eating disorder to 0.94 for BN. DISCUSSION: High rates of agreement were found between diagnoses by EDA-5 and the EDE, and EDA-5 and clinical interviews. Because this study supports the validity of the EDA-5 to generate DSM-5 eating disorders and the reliability of these diagnoses, the EDA-5 may be an option for the assessment of anorexia nervosa, bulimia nervosa, and binge eating disorder. Additional research is needed to evaluate the utility of the EDA-5 in assessing DSM-5 feeding disorders.
Authors: Robyn Sysko; Christina A Roberto; Rachel D Barnes; Carlos M Grilo; Evelyn Attia; B Timothy Walsh Journal: Psychiatry Res Date: 2012-03-06 Impact factor: 3.222
Authors: Helena Chmura Kraemer; David J Kupfer; Diana E Clarke; William E Narrow; Darrel A Regier Journal: Am J Psychiatry Date: 2012-01 Impact factor: 18.112
Authors: Jennifer J Thomas; Sherrie S Delinsky; Sarah A St Germain; Thomas J Weigel; Christopher M Tangren; Philip G Levendusky; Anne E Becker Journal: Psychiatry Res Date: 2010-07-01 Impact factor: 3.222
Authors: Helen B Murray; Adrienne S Juarascio; Carlo Di Lorenzo; Douglas A Drossman; Jennifer J Thomas Journal: Am J Gastroenterol Date: 2019-04 Impact factor: 10.864
Authors: P Evelyna Kambanis; Megan C Kuhnle; Olivia B Wons; Jenny H Jo; Ani C Keshishian; Kristine Hauser; Kendra R Becker; Debra L Franko; Madhusmita Misra; Nadia Micali; Elizabeth A Lawson; Kamryn T Eddy; Jennifer J Thomas Journal: Int J Eat Disord Date: 2019-11-08 Impact factor: 4.861
Authors: Rachel Bryant-Waugh; Nadia Micali; Lucy Cooke; Elizabeth A Lawson; Kamryn T Eddy; Jennifer J Thomas Journal: Int J Eat Disord Date: 2018-10-12 Impact factor: 4.861
Authors: Kelsie T Forbush; Sara R Gould; Danielle A N Chapa; Brittany K Bohrer; Kelsey E Hagan; Kelsey E Clark; Daria A Sorokina; Victoria L Perko Journal: Curr Psychiatry Rep Date: 2017-09-11 Impact factor: 5.285