Literature DB >> 25638754

Comparison of statistical and operational properties of subject randomization procedures for large multicenter clinical trial treating medical emergencies.

Wenle Zhao1, Yunming Mu2, Darren Tayama2, Sharon D Yeatts3.   

Abstract

Large multicenter acute stroke trials demand a randomization procedure with a high level of treatment allocation randomness, an effective control on overall and within-site imbalances, and a minimized time delay of study treatment caused by the randomization procedure. Driven by the randomization algorithm design of A Study of the Efficacy and Safety of Activase (Alteplase) in Patients with Mild Stroke (PRISMS) (NCT02072226), this paper compares operational and statistical properties of different randomization algorithms in local, central, and step-forward randomization settings. Results show that the step-forward randomization with block urn design provides better performances over others. If the concern on the potential time delay is not serious and a central randomization system is available, the minimization method with an imbalance control threshold and a biased coin probability could be a better choice.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Acute stroke trial; Allocation randomness; Baseline balance; Step-forward randomization; Treatment time delay

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25638754      PMCID: PMC4380760          DOI: 10.1016/j.cct.2015.01.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials        ISSN: 1551-7144            Impact factor:   2.226


  20 in total

1.  Detecting selection bias in randomized clinical trials.

Authors:  V W Berger; D V Exner
Journal:  Control Clin Trials       Date:  1999-08

2.  The clinical trial.

Authors:  A B HILL
Journal:  Br Med Bull       Date:  1951       Impact factor: 4.291

3.  Minimal sufficient balance-a new strategy to balance baseline covariates and preserve randomness of treatment allocation.

Authors:  Wenle Zhao; Michael D Hill; Yuko Palesch
Journal:  Stat Methods Med Res       Date:  2012-01-26       Impact factor: 3.021

4.  Sequential balancing: a simple method for treatment allocation in clinical trials.

Authors:  George Florimond Borm; Elizabeth H Hoogendoorn; Martin den Heijer; Gerhard A Zielhuis
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2005-10-14       Impact factor: 2.226

5.  Selection bias, allocation concealment and randomization design in clinical trials.

Authors:  Wenle Zhao
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2013-07-19       Impact factor: 2.226

6.  Minimization: a new method of assigning patients to treatment and control groups.

Authors:  D R Taves
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  1974-05       Impact factor: 6.875

7.  Sequential treatment assignment with balancing for prognostic factors in the controlled clinical trial.

Authors:  S J Pocock; R Simon
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1975-03       Impact factor: 2.571

8.  Time is brain--quantified.

Authors:  Jeffrey L Saver
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2005-12-08       Impact factor: 7.914

9.  A better alternative to stratified permuted block design for subject randomization in clinical trials.

Authors:  Wenle Zhao
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2014-07-14       Impact factor: 2.373

10.  Quantifying the magnitude of baseline covariate imbalances resulting from selection bias in randomized clinical trials.

Authors:  Vance W Berger
Journal:  Biom J       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 2.207

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.