Sabrina S M Lee1, Sam Spear2, William Z Rymer3. 1. Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA; Department of Physical Therapy and Human Movement Sciences, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA. Electronic address: s-lee@northwestern.edu. 2. Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA. 3. Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA; Department of Physiology, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA; Department of Biomedical Engineering, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Material properties of muscles are clinically important parameters for evaluating altered muscle function. Stroke survivors display motor impairments almost immediately after the vascular event, and then gradually develop altered muscle properties. Little is known about the magnitude of these changes in muscle material properties, specifically stiffness. Previous measures of stiffness are limited to estimates of joint stiffness or groups of muscles. Thus, our aim was to determine changes in passive muscle stiffness and composition by measuring: (1) shear wave speed using shear wave ultrasound elastography and (2) echo intensity of the B-mode ultrasound images of the biceps brachii muscle in individuals who have had a stroke. METHODS: Shear wave ultrasound elastography and B-mode ultrasound images of the biceps brachii muscle of the paretic and non-paretic limbs of sixteen stroke survivors were captured at rest. FINDINGS: Our main results show that shear wave speed and echo intensity of the paretic side were on average 69.5% and 15.5% significantly greater than those of the non-paretic side, respectively. Differences in shear wave speed between the non-paretic and the paretic muscles were strongly correlated with differences in echo intensity, time since stroke, and with Fugl-Meyer scores. INTERPRETATION: Muscle stiffness and muscle composition, as indicated by SW speed and echo intensity, may be altered in stroke-impaired muscle at rest. These findings highlight the potential for SW elastography as a tool for both investigating the fundamental mechanisms behind changes in stroke-impaired muscle, and for evaluation of muscle mechanical properties as part of clinical examination.
BACKGROUND: Material properties of muscles are clinically important parameters for evaluating altered muscle function. Stroke survivors display motor impairments almost immediately after the vascular event, and then gradually develop altered muscle properties. Little is known about the magnitude of these changes in muscle material properties, specifically stiffness. Previous measures of stiffness are limited to estimates of joint stiffness or groups of muscles. Thus, our aim was to determine changes in passive muscle stiffness and composition by measuring: (1) shear wave speed using shear wave ultrasound elastography and (2) echo intensity of the B-mode ultrasound images of the biceps brachii muscle in individuals who have had a stroke. METHODS: Shear wave ultrasound elastography and B-mode ultrasound images of the biceps brachii muscle of the paretic and non-paretic limbs of sixteen stroke survivors were captured at rest. FINDINGS: Our main results show that shear wave speed and echo intensity of the paretic side were on average 69.5% and 15.5% significantly greater than those of the non-paretic side, respectively. Differences in shear wave speed between the non-paretic and the paretic muscles were strongly correlated with differences in echo intensity, time since stroke, and with Fugl-Meyer scores. INTERPRETATION:Muscle stiffness and muscle composition, as indicated by SW speed and echo intensity, may be altered in stroke-impaired muscle at rest. These findings highlight the potential for SW elastography as a tool for both investigating the fundamental mechanisms behind changes in stroke-impaired muscle, and for evaluation of muscle mechanical properties as part of clinical examination.
Authors: Sigrid Pillen; Ramon O Tak; Machiel J Zwarts; Martin M Y Lammens; Kiek N Verrijp; Ilse M P Arts; Jeroen A van der Laak; Peter M Hoogerbrugge; Baziel G M van Engelen; Aad Verrips Journal: Ultrasound Med Biol Date: 2008-12-10 Impact factor: 2.998
Authors: Pieter T G Bot; Imo E Hoefer; Joost P G Sluijter; Patrick van Vliet; Anke M Smits; Franck Lebrin; Frans Moll; Jean-Paul de Vries; Pieter Doevendans; Jan J Piek; Gerard Pasterkamp; Marie-José Goumans Journal: Stroke Date: 2008-12-12 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: Kristen L Jakubowski; Ada Terman; Ricardo V C Santana; Sabrina S M Lee Journal: Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) Date: 2017-08-24 Impact factor: 2.063
Authors: Matthieu K Chardon; Nina L Suresh; Yasin Y Dhaher; W Zev Rymer Journal: IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng Date: 2020-03-05 Impact factor: 3.802
Authors: Ghulam Rasool; Allison B Wang; William Z Rymer; Sabrina S M Lee Journal: IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng Date: 2018-10 Impact factor: 3.802
Authors: Sabrina S M Lee; Deborah Gaebler-Spira; Li-Qun Zhang; William Z Rymer; Katherine M Steele Journal: Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) Date: 2015-10-18 Impact factor: 2.063
Authors: Amy N Adkins; Julius P A Dewald; Lindsay P Garmirian; Christa M Nelson; Wendy M Murray Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2021-06-29 Impact factor: 12.779