Literature DB >> 25638635

Helicopter versus ground emergency medical services for the transportation of traumatically injured children.

Camille L Stewart1, Ryan R Metzger2, Laura Pyle3, Joe Darmofal4, Eric Scaife5, Steven L Moulton6.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Helicopter emergency medical services (HEMS) are a common mode of transportation for pediatric trauma patients. We hypothesized that HEMS improve outcomes for traumatically injured children compared to ground emergency medical services (GEMS).
METHODS: We queried trauma registries of two level 1 pediatric trauma centers for children 0-17 years, treated from 2003 to 2013, transported by HEMS or GEMS, with known transport starting location and outcome. A geocoding service estimated travel distance and time. Multivariate regression analyses were performed to adjust for injury severity variables and travel distance/time.
RESULTS: We identified 14,405 traumatically injured children; 3870 (26.9%) transported by HEMS and 10,535 (73.1%) transported by GEMS. Transport type was not significantly associated with survival, ICU length of stay, or discharge disposition. Transport by GEMS was associated with a 68.6%-53.1% decrease in hospital length of stay, depending on adjustment for distance/time. Results were similar for children with severe injuries, and with propensity score matched cohorts. Of note, 862/3850 (22.3%) of HEMS transports had an ISS<10 and hospitalization<1 day.
CONCLUSIONS: HEMS do not independently improve outcomes for traumatically injured children, and 22.3% of children transported by HEMS are not significantly injured. These factors should be considered when requesting HEMS for transport of traumatically injured children.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Air transport; Helicopter emergency medical services; Pediatric trauma; Resource utilization

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25638635     DOI: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2014.09.040

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pediatr Surg        ISSN: 0022-3468            Impact factor:   2.545


  4 in total

1.  Air Rescue for Pediatric Trauma in a Metropolitan Region of Brazil: Profiles, Outcomes, and Overtriage Rates.

Authors:  Paulo C M Colbachini; Fernando A L Marson; Andressa O Peixoto; Luisa Sarti; Andrea M A Fraga
Journal:  Front Pediatr       Date:  2022-06-02       Impact factor: 3.569

2.  Helicopters and injured kids: Improved survival with scene air medical transport in the pediatric trauma population.

Authors:  Joshua B Brown; Christine M Leeper; Jason L Sperry; Andrew B Peitzman; Timothy R Billiar; Barbara A Gaines; Mark L Gestring
Journal:  J Trauma Acute Care Surg       Date:  2016-05       Impact factor: 3.313

3.  Are severely injured trauma victims in Norway offered advanced pre-hospital care? National, retrospective, observational cohort.

Authors:  T Wisborg; E N Ellensen; I Svege; T Dehli
Journal:  Acta Anaesthesiol Scand       Date:  2017-06-26       Impact factor: 2.105

4.  Polish Medical Air Rescue Crew Interventions Concerning Neonatal Patients.

Authors:  Ewa Rzońca; Grażyna Bączek; Marcin Podgórski; Robert Gałązkowski
Journal:  Children (Basel)       Date:  2021-06-29
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.