OBJECTIVE: Respiratory motion causes loss of image quality and inaccuracy of quantification in oncologic positron emission tomography (PET) imaging. This study introduces a bioimpedance-based gating method for compensation of respiratory motion artefacts. METHODS: The bioimpedance-based respiratory gating method was studied parallel to a clinically used respiratory gating method [Real-time Position Management by Varian Medical Systems] in 4D PET/CT acquisition of 9 oncologic patients. The quantitative analysis consisted of the evaluation of tumour SUVpeak, SUVmax and volume. Additionally, target-to-background ratios as well as motion in cranial-caudal and anterior-posterior directions were measured. The evaluation was performed with amplitude- and time-based gating using averaged attenuation correction maps. RESULTS: Bioimpedance gating resulted in 17.7-18.9 % increase in mean SUVpeak and 20.0-21.4 % decrease in mean volume compared to non-gated images. The maximum motion measured from the bioimpedance-gated images was 19 mm in cranial-caudal direction and 9 mm in anterior-posterior direction. CONCLUSIONS: Bioimpedance-based respiratory gating compensates the adverse effects of motion in oncologic PET imaging.
OBJECTIVE: Respiratory motion causes loss of image quality and inaccuracy of quantification in oncologic positron emission tomography (PET) imaging. This study introduces a bioimpedance-based gating method for compensation of respiratory motion artefacts. METHODS: The bioimpedance-based respiratory gating method was studied parallel to a clinically used respiratory gating method [Real-time Position Management by Varian Medical Systems] in 4D PET/CT acquisition of 9 oncologic patients. The quantitative analysis consisted of the evaluation of tumour SUVpeak, SUVmax and volume. Additionally, target-to-background ratios as well as motion in cranial-caudal and anterior-posterior directions were measured. The evaluation was performed with amplitude- and time-based gating using averaged attenuation correction maps. RESULTS: Bioimpedance gating resulted in 17.7-18.9 % increase in mean SUVpeak and 20.0-21.4 % decrease in mean volume compared to non-gated images. The maximum motion measured from the bioimpedance-gated images was 19 mm in cranial-caudal direction and 9 mm in anterior-posterior direction. CONCLUSIONS: Bioimpedance-based respiratory gating compensates the adverse effects of motion in oncologic PET imaging.
Authors: Matti J Kortelainen; Tuomas M Koivumäki; Marko J Vauhkonen; Marja K Hedman; Satu T J Kärkkäinen; Juanita Niño Quintero; Mikko A Hakulinen Journal: J Nucl Cardiol Date: 2017-03-16 Impact factor: 5.952