Literature DB >> 25637956

Quantifying the weight of fingerprint evidence through the spatial relationship, directions and types of minutiae observed on fingermarks.

Cedric Neumann1, Christophe Champod2, Mina Yoo3, Thibault Genessay2, Glenn Langenburg4.   

Abstract

This paper presents a statistical model for the quantification of the weight of fingerprint evidence. Contrarily to previous models (generative and score-based models), our model proposes to estimate the probability distributions of spatial relationships, directions and types of minutiae observed on fingerprints for any given fingermark. Our model is relying on an AFIS algorithm provided by 3M Cogent and on a dataset of more than 4,000,000 fingerprints to represent a sample from a relevant population of potential sources. The performance of our model was tested using several hundreds of minutiae configurations observed on a set of 565 fingermarks. In particular, the effects of various sub-populations of fingers (i.e., finger number, finger general pattern) on the expected evidential value of our test configurations were investigated. The performance of our model indicates that the spatial relationship between minutiae carries more evidential weight than their type or direction. Our results also indicate that the AFIS component of our model directly enables us to assign weight to fingerprint evidence without the need for the additional layer of complex statistical modeling involved by the estimation of the probability distributions of fingerprint features. In fact, it seems that the AFIS component is more sensitive to the sub-population effects than the other components of the model. Overall, the data generated during this research project contributes to support the idea that fingerprint evidence is a valuable forensic tool for the identification of individuals.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Keywords:  Fingerprint evidence; Spatial relationship; Statistical model; Strength of evidence; Sub-population effect

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25637956     DOI: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2015.01.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Forensic Sci Int        ISSN: 0379-0738            Impact factor:   2.395


  2 in total

1.  Probabilistic reporting and algorithms in forensic science: Stakeholder perspectives within the American criminal justice system.

Authors:  H Swofford; C Champod
Journal:  Forensic Sci Int Synerg       Date:  2022-02-12

Review 2.  Implementation of algorithms in pattern & impression evidence: A responsible and practical roadmap.

Authors:  H Swofford; C Champod
Journal:  Forensic Sci Int       Date:  2021-02-18       Impact factor: 2.395

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.