Literature DB >> 25637785

Complete response at first chemoembolization is still the most robust predictor for favorable outcome in hepatocellular carcinoma.

Beom Kyung Kim1, Seung Up Kim2, Kyung Ah Kim3, Yong Eun Chung4, Myeong-Jin Kim4, Mi-Suk Park4, Jun Yong Park1, Do Young Kim1, Sang Hoon Ahn5, Man Deuk Kim4, Sung Il Park4, Jong Yoon Won4, Do Yun Lee4, Kwang-Hyub Han5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUNDS & AIMS: The aim of this study is to evaluate the prognostic significances of not only the initial and the best response during repeated transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), but if eligible, also the time point of achieving treatment responses.
METHODS: Three hundred and fourteen treatment-naïve patients with well-preserved liver function undergoing TACE were recruited. Treatment responses were assessed using modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors. Overall survival (OS) was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier methods, and Cox regression analysis was performed for multivariate analysis.
RESULTS: After adjusting other variables, objective response (complete response [CR] and partial response [PR]) as the initial response (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 0.410) and the best response (adjusted HR 0.335) had independent prognostic significances for OS, respectively (both p < 0.001). Objective responders as the initial response had the longest OS, followed by patients who subsequently achieved objective response after at least two sessions and those who did not achieve objective response during treatment course eventually (52.6, 27.0, and 10.8 months, respectively; log-rank test, p < 0.001). Likewise, patients with CR as the initial response had the longest OS, followed by those who subsequently achieved CR after at least two sessions and those who achieved PR as the best response (70.2, 40.6, and 23.0 months, respectively; log-rank test, p < 0.001). Large (>5 cm) and multiple (⩾ 4) tumors were independently associated with failure to achieve CR after the initial TACE (both p < 0.05).
CONCLUSION: Both the initial and the best response predicts OS effectively. However, achievement of treatment response at an early time point is still the most robust predictor for favorable outcomes.
Copyright © 2015 European Association for the Study of the Liver. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Best response; Chemoembolization; Hepatocellular carcinoma; Initial response; Prognosis

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25637785     DOI: 10.1016/j.jhep.2015.01.022

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Hepatol        ISSN: 0168-8278            Impact factor:   25.083


  52 in total

1.  Drug-eluting bead transarterial chemoembolization for hepatocellular carcinoma: does size really matter?

Authors:  Sieh-Yang Lee; Hsin-You Ou; Chun-Yen Yu; Tung-Liang Huang; Leo Leung-Chit Tsang; Yu-Fan Cheng
Journal:  Diagn Interv Radiol       Date:  2020-05       Impact factor: 2.630

2.  A Changing Paradigm for the Treatment of Intermediate-Stage Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Asia-Pacific Primary Liver Cancer Expert Consensus Statements.

Authors:  Masatoshi Kudo; Kwang-Hyub Han; Sheng-Long Ye; Jian Zhou; Yi-Hsiang Huang; Shi-Ming Lin; Chung-Kwe Wang; Masafumi Ikeda; Stephen Lam Chan; Su Pin Choo; Shiro Miyayama; Ann Lii Cheng
Journal:  Liver Cancer       Date:  2020-05-13       Impact factor: 11.740

3.  Portal hypertension is associated with poor outcome of transarterial chemoembolization in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Jin Woo Choi; Jin Wook Chung; Dong Ho Lee; Hyo-Cheol Kim; Saebeom Hur; Myungsu Lee; Hwan Jun Jae
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2017-12-07       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  Comparison of initial tumor responses to transarterial bland embolization and drug-eluting beads-transarterial chemoembolization in the management of hepatocellular carcinoma: a propensity-score matching analysis.

Authors:  Jianxi Guo; Weidong Wang; Yanfang Zhang; Linfeng Xu; Jian Kong
Journal:  J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2021-08

5.  Degradable starch microspheres transarterial chemoembolization (DSMs-TACE) in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC): long-term results from a single-center 137-patient cohort prospective study.

Authors:  Antonio Orlacchio; Fabrizio Chegai; Silvia Roma; Stefano Merolla; Alessandra Bosa; Simona Francioso
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2019-10-03       Impact factor: 3.469

6.  Poor outcome of hepatocellular carcinoma with stemness marker under hypoxia: resistance to transarterial chemoembolization.

Authors:  Hyungjin Rhee; Ji Hae Nahm; Haeryoung Kim; Gi Hong Choi; Jeong Eun Yoo; Hye Sun Lee; Myoung Ju Koh; Young Nyun Park
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  2016-06-17       Impact factor: 7.842

7.  Retrospective European Multicentric Evaluation of Selective Transarterial Chemoembolisation with and without Balloon-Occlusion in Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Propensity Score Matched Analysis.

Authors:  Rita Golfieri; Mario Bezzi; Gontran Verset; Fabio Fucilli; Cristina Mosconi; Alberta Cappelli; Alexandro Paccapelo; Pierleone Lucatelli; Nicolas Magand; Agnes Rode; Thierry De Baere
Journal:  Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol       Date:  2021-03-11       Impact factor: 2.740

8.  Redefining Tumor Burden in Patients with Intermediate-Stage Hepatocellular Carcinoma: The Seven-Eleven Criteria.

Authors:  Ya-Wen Hung; I-Cheng Lee; Chen-Ta Chi; Rheun-Chuan Lee; Chien-An Liu; Nai-Chi Chiu; Hsuen-En Hwang; Yee Chao; Ming-Chih Hou; Yi-Hsiang Huang
Journal:  Liver Cancer       Date:  2021-07-22       Impact factor: 11.740

9.  Prognostic value of splenic volume in hepatocellular carcinoma patients receiving transarterial chemoembolization.

Authors:  Hai-Tao Dai; Bin Chen; Ke-Yu Tang; Gui-Yuan Zhang; Chun-Yong Wen; Xian-Hong Xiang; Jian-Yong Yang; Yan Guo; Run Lin; Yong-Hui Huang
Journal:  J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2021-06

10.  Random Survival Forests to Predict Disease Control for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treated With Transarterial Chemoembolization Combined With Sorafenib.

Authors:  Bin-Yan Zhong; Zhi-Ping Yan; Jun-Hui Sun; Lei Zhang; Zhong-Heng Hou; Xiao-Li Zhu; Ling Wen; Cai-Fang Ni
Journal:  Front Mol Biosci       Date:  2021-05-20
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.