| Literature DB >> 25637461 |
Tessandra Stewart, Vesna Sossi, Jan O Aasly, Zbigniew K Wszolek, Ryan J Uitti, Kazuko Hasegawa, Teruo Yokoyama, Cyrus P Zabetian, James B Leverenz, Alexander Jon Stoessl, Yu Wang, Carmen Ginghina, Changqin Liu, Kevin C Cain, Peggy Auinger, Un Jung Kang, Poul Henning Jensen, Min Shi, Jing Zhang.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: α-Synuclein (α-syn) is a key protein in Parkinson's disease (PD), and one of its phosphorylated forms, pS129, is higher in PD patients than healthy controls. However, few studies have examined its levels in longitudinally collected cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) or in preclinical cases. In this study, CSF and clinical data were contributed by >300 subjects from three cohorts (the longitudinal DATATOP cohort, a large cross-sectional cohort, and a cohort of LRRK2 mutation carriers).Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 25637461 PMCID: PMC4362824 DOI: 10.1186/s40478-015-0185-3
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Acta Neuropathol Commun ISSN: 2051-5960 Impact factor: 7.801
Demographic characteristics of cohorts
|
|
|
|
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, y (mean ± SD) | 61.08 ± 8.91 | 63.08 ± 8.68 | 65.94 ± 10.54 | 53.13 ± 13.88 |
| Sex F/M (% Male) | 35/60 (63%) | 35/60 (63%) | 52/157 (75%) | 15/15 (50%) |
| Duration of disease, y | ||||
| Mean ± SD | 1.9 ± 1.41 | 4.02 ± 1.55 | 7.9 ± 6.48 | -- |
| Range | 0 – 6 | 1 – 9 | 0 – 42 | |
| MMSE | ||||
| Mean ± SD | 28.85 ± 1.57 | 28.81 ± 1.48 | 28.47 ± 3.07 | -- |
| Range | 23 – 30 | 22 – 30 | 11 – 30 | |
| H&Y† | ||||
| Median | 2.0 | 2.0 | 2.0 | -- |
| Range | 1.0 – 2.5 | 1.0 – 4.0 | 0.0 – 5.0 | |
| UPDRS‡ Total | ||||
| Mean ± SD | 24.87 ± 12.50 | 40.73 ± 16.63 | -- | -- |
| Range | 0 – 61 | 9 – 88 | ||
| UPDRS Motor | ||||
| Mean ± SD | 16.90 ± 9.52 | 27.36 ± 12.13 | 23.72 ± 11.87 | 5.20 ± 4.73 |
| Range | 0 – 50 | 5 – 62 | 0 – 71 | 0 – 20 |
| Ps129 (pg/ml) | ||||
| Mean ± SD | 114.66 ± 17.14 | 117.89 ± 17.92 | 74.01 ± 26.67 | 63.79 ± 22.73 |
| Range | 57.11 – 151.63 | 68.66 – 170.78 | 0.00 – 203.17 | 35.2 – 145.1 |
| Total α-syn (pg/ml) | ||||
| Mean ± SD | 630.83 ± 703.08 | 639.48 ± 677.95 | 553.61 ± 409.22 | 744.78 ± 1169.94 |
| Range | 186.3 – 6343.5 | 173.6 – 4523.0 | 140.0 – 2990.0 | 170.98 – 5735.08 |
| Ratio | ||||
| Mean ± SD | 0.2530 ± 0.1232 | 0.2688 ± 0.1433 | 0.177 ± 0.098 | 0.172 ± 0.132 |
| Range | 0.01 – 0.77 | 0.02 – 0.86 | 0.00 – 0.53 | 0.01 – 0.56 |
†Hoehn and Yahr.
‡Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale3.
Paired t-test, change in marker: (Hgb > 200 excluded for both α-syn and pS129 to allow direct comparison of identical subject groups
|
|
|
| |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| Ps129 (pg/ml) |
|
|
| −2.78 | 19.09 | 0.534 |
|
|
|
| Ps129/Syn |
|
|
| 0.018 | 0.079 | 0.347 |
|
|
|
| Syn (pg/ml) | −169.93 | 877.37 | 0.173 | −245.73 | 134.65 | 0.085 | −190.50 | 805.51 | 0.052 |
Bold font indicates significance at the p=0.05 level.
Figure 1Longitudinal changes in pS129 and relationship with total α-syn. A) Change in pS129 by baseline level. Triangles: subjects that did not reach endpoint. Squares: subjects that reached endpoint. Solid line: regression line generated from all subjects combined. B) Association between total α-syn and pS129 levels by time point. Circles: baseline time point. Squares: final time point. Lines represent correlation between total α-syn and pS129 for each time point.
Comparison of correlation between UPDRS motor scores and CSF pS129 levels, overall and stratified by disease duration
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
| pS129 | Whole cohort |
|
|
| 95 | 0.147 | 0.834 |
|
|
| 30 | −0.050 | 0.794 |
| Disease duration ≤2 years |
|
|
| 18 | −0.093 | 0.712 | 32 | 0.043 | 0.817 | -- | |||
| Disease duration >2 years | 23 | −0.067 | 0.778 | 74 | −0.050 | 0.674 |
|
|
| -- | |||
B: baseline time point. F: final time point. Most LRRK2 cohort subjects have not yet received PD diagnoses. Disease durations not available for 3 DATATOP subjects and 3 multi-center collaborative cohort subjects.
Bold font indicates significance at the p=0.05 level.
Figure 2The relationship between pS129 and motor symptoms changes with disease severity. pS129 and UPDRS motor scores by disease duration A) Relationship between CSF pS129 and UPDRS motor scores in subjects in DATATOP and cross-sectional cohorts. Line is Loess curve for combined datasets including multi-center collaborative cohort and DATATOP baseline and final time points. B)-E) Relationship between pS129 and UPDRS in cohort subsets divided by disease stage. B) DATATOP DD less than 2 years. C) DATATOP DD greater than 2 years. D) Cross-sectional DD less than 2 years. D) Cross-sectional DD greater than 2 years. MC: Multi-center collaborative cohort. DD: Disease duration, time since diagnosis in years. DB: DATATOP baseline time point. DF: DATATOP final time point. Diamonds: multi-center collaborative cohort. Black circles: DATATOP baseline. Gray circles: DATATOP final.
Figure 3LRRK2 subjects with greater brain pathology have lower CSF pS129. A) Significant decrease in TBZ scores in subjects with PD diagnoses. B. Relationship between TBZ scores and pS129 in LRRK2 mutation carriers. Note that x-axis is inverted to facilitate comparison with UPDRS measurements in Figure 2. Dotted regression lines represent whole cohort; solid lines represent cohort excluding subjects with TBZ scores ≥1. Black triangles: Subjects without PD diagnosis and TBZ < 1. Open triangles: Subjects with no diagnosis and TBZ > 1. Circles: Subjects with PD diagnosis and UPDRS motor scores < 20.