Literature DB >> 25637226

The implications of state-dependent tDCS effects in aging: Behavioural response is determined by baseline performance.

Gemma Learmonth1, Gregor Thut2, Christopher S Y Benwell3, Monika Harvey4.   

Abstract

Young adults typically display a processing advantage towards the left side of space ("pseudoneglect"), possibly as a result of right parietal dominance for spatial attention. This bias is ameliorated with age, with older adults displaying either no strongly lateralised bias, or a slight bias towards the right. This may represent an age-related reduction of right hemispheric dominance and/or increased left hemispheric involvement. Here, we applied anodal transcranial direct current stimulation (atDCS) to the right posterior parietal cortex (PPC; R-atDCS), the left PPC (L-atDCS) and a Sham protocol in young and older adults during a titrated lateralised visual detection task. We aimed to facilitate visual detection sensitivity in the contralateral visual field with both R-atDCS and L-atDCS relative to Sham. We found no differences in the effects of stimulation between young and older adults. Instead the effects of atDCS were state-dependent (i.e. related to task performance at baseline). Relative to Sham, poor task performers were impaired in both visual fields by anodal stimulation of the left posterior parietal cortex (PPC). Conversely, good performers maintained sensitivity in both visual fields in response to R-atDCS, although this effect was small. We highlight the importance of considering baseline task ability when designing tDCS experiments, particularly in older adults.
Copyright © 2015 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.

Keywords:  Attention; Harold model; Non-invasive brain stimulation; Plasticity; Posterior parietal cortex; Pseudoneglect

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25637226     DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2015.01.037

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuropsychologia        ISSN: 0028-3932            Impact factor:   3.139


  37 in total

Review 1.  Low intensity transcranial electric stimulation: Safety, ethical, legal regulatory and application guidelines.

Authors:  A Antal; I Alekseichuk; M Bikson; J Brockmöller; A R Brunoni; R Chen; L G Cohen; G Dowthwaite; J Ellrich; A Flöel; F Fregni; M S George; R Hamilton; J Haueisen; C S Herrmann; F C Hummel; J P Lefaucheur; D Liebetanz; C K Loo; C D McCaig; C Miniussi; P C Miranda; V Moliadze; M A Nitsche; R Nowak; F Padberg; A Pascual-Leone; W Poppendieck; A Priori; S Rossi; P M Rossini; J Rothwell; M A Rueger; G Ruffini; K Schellhorn; H R Siebner; Y Ugawa; A Wexler; U Ziemann; M Hallett; W Paulus
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-06-19       Impact factor: 3.708

2.  Evidence against benefits from cognitive training and transcranial direct current stimulation in healthy older adults.

Authors:  Kristina S Horne; Hannah L Filmer; Zoie E Nott; Ziarih Hawi; Kealan Pugsley; Jason B Mattingley; Paul E Dux
Journal:  Nat Hum Behav       Date:  2020-10-26

3.  Modulation of dual-task control with right prefrontal transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS).

Authors:  Tilo Strobach; Daria Antonenko; Maral Abbarin; Malvin Escher; Agnes Flöel; Torsten Schubert
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2017-11-25       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 4.  Transcranial Electrical Stimulation: What We Know and Do Not Know About Mechanisms.

Authors:  Anna Fertonani; Carlo Miniussi
Journal:  Neuroscientist       Date:  2016-07-08       Impact factor: 7.519

5.  Leveraging technology to personalize cognitive enhancement methods in aging.

Authors:  David A Ziegler; Joaquin A Anguera; Courtney L Gallen; Wan-Yu Hsu; Peter E Wais; Adam Gazzaley
Journal:  Nat Aging       Date:  2022-06-17

6.  How to Test the Association Between Baseline Performance Level and the Modulatory Effects of Non-Invasive Brain Stimulation Techniques.

Authors:  Carlotta Lega; Luigi Cattaneo; Giulio Costantini
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2022-06-24       Impact factor: 3.473

7.  The Effect of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on Error Rates in the Distractor-Induced Deafness Paradigm.

Authors:  Lars Michael; Ana Böke; Henry Ipczynski
Journal:  Brain Sci       Date:  2022-06-04

8.  Spontaneous Network Coupling Enables Efficient Task Performance without Local Task-Induced Activations.

Authors:  Leslie Allaman; Anaïs Mottaz; Andreas Kleinschmidt; Adrian G Guggisberg
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2020-11-06       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  An open letter concerning do-it-yourself users of transcranial direct current stimulation.

Authors:  Rachel Wurzman; Roy H Hamilton; Alvaro Pascual-Leone; Michael D Fox
Journal:  Ann Neurol       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 10.422

10.  The neural correlates of flow experience explored with transcranial direct current stimulation.

Authors:  Martin Ulrich; Johannes Niemann; Markus Boland; Thomas Kammer; Filip Niemann; Georg Grön
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2018-09-12       Impact factor: 1.972

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.