Literature DB >> 25637198

[Response criteria for malignant melanoma: RECIST and irRC].

J Spiro1, D Maintz, T Persigehl.   

Abstract

In the field of oncology the response evaluation criteria in solid tumors (RECIST) currently represent the most commonly used and validated radiological response criteria for objective treatment monitoring of conventional chemotherapy. For therapy monitoring of classical cytostatic and cytotoxic tumor therapies RECIST has been tested and successfully validated in many clinical studies. However, with the introduction of novel molecular drugs limitations of these size-based criteria became obvious due to response patterns which are not reflected by RECIST. Thus, for a comprehensive evaluation of modern immunotherapeutic agents new immune-related response criteria (irRC) were developed.This review gives a brief overview of the most important radiological response criteria RECIST 1.0 and 1.1 as well as irRC for malignant melanoma.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25637198     DOI: 10.1007/s00117-014-2763-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiologe        ISSN: 0033-832X            Impact factor:   0.635


  8 in total

1.  New guidelines to evaluate the response to treatment in solid tumors. European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer, National Cancer Institute of the United States, National Cancer Institute of Canada.

Authors:  P Therasse; S G Arbuck; E A Eisenhauer; J Wanders; R S Kaplan; L Rubinstein; J Verweij; M Van Glabbeke; A T van Oosterom; M C Christian; S G Gwyther
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2000-02-02       Impact factor: 13.506

2.  Malignant melanoma S3-guideline "diagnosis, therapy and follow-up of melanoma".

Authors:  Annette Pflugfelder; Corinna Kochs; Andreas Blum; Marcus Capellaro; Christina Czeschik; Therese Dettenborn; Dorothee Dill; Edgar Dippel; Thomas Eigentler; Petra Feyer; Markus Follmann; Bernhard Frerich; Maria-Katharina Ganten; Jan Gärtner; Ralf Gutzmer; Jessica Hassel; Axel Hauschild; Peter Hohenberger; Jutta Hübner; Martin Kaatz; Ulrich R Kleeberg; Oliver Kölbl; Rolf-Dieter Kortmann; Albrecht Krause-Bergmann; Peter Kurschat; Ulrike Leiter; Hartmut Link; Carmen Loquai; Christoph Löser; Andreas Mackensen; Friedegund Meier; Peter Mohr; Matthias Möhrle; Dorothee Nashan; Sven Reske; Christian Rose; Christian Sander; Imke Satzger; Meinhard Schiller; Heinz-Peter Schlemmer; Gerhard Strittmatter; Cord Sunderkötter; Lothar Swoboda; Uwe Trefzer; Raymond Voltz; Dirk Vordermark; Michael Weichenthal; Andreas Werner; Simone Wesselmann; Ansgar J Weyergraf; Wolfgang Wick; Claus Garbe; Dirk Schadendorf
Journal:  J Dtsch Dermatol Ges       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 5.584

Review 3.  Radiological monitoring of the treatment of solid tumors in practice.

Authors:  M K Ganten; T M Ganten; H P Schlemmer
Journal:  Rofo       Date:  2014-02-21

4.  Developing a common language for tumor response to immunotherapy: immune-related response criteria using unidimensional measurements.

Authors:  Mizuki Nishino; Anita Giobbie-Hurder; Maria Gargano; Margaret Suda; Nikhil H Ramaiya; F Stephen Hodi
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2013-06-06       Impact factor: 12.531

5.  Guidelines for the evaluation of immune therapy activity in solid tumors: immune-related response criteria.

Authors:  Jedd D Wolchok; Axel Hoos; Steven O'Day; Jeffrey S Weber; Omid Hamid; Celeste Lebbé; Michele Maio; Michael Binder; Oliver Bohnsack; Geoffrey Nichol; Rachel Humphrey; F Stephen Hodi
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2009-11-24       Impact factor: 12.531

6.  New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1).

Authors:  E A Eisenhauer; P Therasse; J Bogaerts; L H Schwartz; D Sargent; R Ford; J Dancey; S Arbuck; S Gwyther; M Mooney; L Rubinstein; L Shankar; L Dodd; R Kaplan; D Lacombe; J Verweij
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 9.162

7.  Evaluation of lymph nodes with RECIST 1.1.

Authors:  L H Schwartz; J Bogaerts; R Ford; L Shankar; P Therasse; S Gwyther; E A Eisenhauer
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2008-12-16       Impact factor: 9.162

8.  Response assessment in metastatic melanoma treated with ipilimumab and bevacizumab: CT tumor size and density as markers for response and outcome.

Authors:  Mizuki Nishino; Anita Giobbie-Hurder; Nikhil H Ramaiya; F Stephen Hodi
Journal:  J Immunother Cancer       Date:  2014-11-18       Impact factor: 13.751

  8 in total
  4 in total

Review 1.  Imaging Procedures for Colorectal Cancer.

Authors:  Bettina Baeßler; David Maintz; Thorsten Persigehl
Journal:  Visc Med       Date:  2016-06-08

Review 2.  [Tumor assessment in immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy : Tumor response, progression and pseudoprogression].

Authors:  S Foller; H Oppel-Heuchel; M-O Grimm
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 0.639

Review 3.  [Radiological response assessment of modern immunotherapy using iRECIST].

Authors:  T Persigehl; T D Poeppel; O Sedlaczek
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 0.635

4.  Clinical Practice Guidelines for Cryosurgery of Pancreatic Cancer: A Consensus Statement From the China Cooperative Group of Cryosurgery on Pancreatic Cancer, International Society of Cryosurgery, and Asian Society of Cryosurgery.

Authors:  Lihua He; Lizhi Niu; Nikolai N Korpan; Sajio Sumida; Yueyong Xiao; Jiaping Li; Barlian Sutedja; Youyong Lu; Jiansheng Zuo; Jianguo Liu; Kecheng Xu
Journal:  Pancreas       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 3.327

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.