Brian Levy1, Nancy Ramirez1, Gary D Novack2, Casey Kopczynski1. 1. Aerie Pharmaceuticals, Inc, Bridgewater, New Jersey, and Research Triangle Park, North Carolina. 2. PharmaLogic Development, Inc, San Rafael, California. Electronic address: gary_novack@pharmalogic.com.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To evaluate the ocular and systemic safety and systemic absorption of AR-13324 in normotensive, healthy volunteers. DESIGN: Open-label, noncomparative, single-arm phase 1 clinical trial. METHODS: setting: Phase 1 clinical trials unit. patient or study population: Eighteen normal adult volunteers. intervention or observation procedures: Subjects received AR-13324 ophthalmic solution 0.02% once daily in the morning in each eye for 8 days. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Plasma concentrations of AR-13324 and its presumed human metabolite, AR-13503, and ocular safety measures. RESULTS: There were no observed plasma AR-13324 concentrations higher than the lower limit of quantitation at any time point in any subject. Only 1 plasma sample from 1 subject (day 8 at 8 hours after dose administration) had an AR-13503 concentration higher than the lower limit of quantitation (0.11 ng/mL). AR-13324 dosed once daily in the morning produced substantial reductions in baseline intraocular pressure of up to 6 mm Hg that were statistically significant (P < .001) at all time points after dose administration. All but 1 subject exhibited transient conjunctival hyperemia to some degree in the 8-hour period after morning dosing. CONCLUSIONS: AR-13324 ophthalmic solution 0.2%, administered once daily in the morning for 8 days, produced little or no quantifiable systemic exposure to the parent compound or a presumed metabolite. Clinically and statistically significant reductions in intraocular pressure were observed in these normotensive subjects that were more pronounced compared with what has been observed commonly with other ocular hypotensive therapies in this population.
PURPOSE: To evaluate the ocular and systemic safety and systemic absorption of AR-13324 in normotensive, healthy volunteers. DESIGN: Open-label, noncomparative, single-arm phase 1 clinical trial. METHODS: setting: Phase 1 clinical trials unit. patient or study population: Eighteen normal adult volunteers. intervention or observation procedures: Subjects received AR-13324 ophthalmic solution 0.02% once daily in the morning in each eye for 8 days. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Plasma concentrations of AR-13324 and its presumed human metabolite, AR-13503, and ocular safety measures. RESULTS: There were no observed plasma AR-13324 concentrations higher than the lower limit of quantitation at any time point in any subject. Only 1 plasma sample from 1 subject (day 8 at 8 hours after dose administration) had an AR-13503 concentration higher than the lower limit of quantitation (0.11 ng/mL). AR-13324 dosed once daily in the morning produced substantial reductions in baseline intraocular pressure of up to 6 mm Hg that were statistically significant (P < .001) at all time points after dose administration. All but 1 subject exhibited transient conjunctival hyperemia to some degree in the 8-hour period after morning dosing. CONCLUSIONS:AR-13324 ophthalmic solution 0.2%, administered once daily in the morning for 8 days, produced little or no quantifiable systemic exposure to the parent compound or a presumed metabolite. Clinically and statistically significant reductions in intraocular pressure were observed in these normotensive subjects that were more pronounced compared with what has been observed commonly with other ocular hypotensive therapies in this population.
Authors: Guorong Li; Dibyendu Mukherjee; Iris Navarro; Nicole E Ashpole; Joseph M Sherwood; Jinlong Chang; Darryl R Overby; Fan Yuan; Pedro Gonzalez; Casey C Kopczynski; Sina Farsiu; W Daniel Stamer Journal: Eur J Pharmacol Date: 2016-04-13 Impact factor: 4.432
Authors: Arash Kazemi; Jay W McLaren; Casey C Kopczynski; Theresa G Heah; Gary D Novack; Arthur J Sit Journal: J Ocul Pharmacol Ther Date: 2018-02-22 Impact factor: 2.671
Authors: Cheng-Wen Lin; Bryan Sherman; Lori A Moore; Carmen L Laethem; Da-Wen Lu; Padmanabhan P Pattabiraman; Ponugoti Vasantha Rao; Mitchell A deLong; Casey C Kopczynski Journal: J Ocul Pharmacol Ther Date: 2017-06-13 Impact factor: 2.671
Authors: Michael P Vincent; Trevor Stack; Amir Vahabikashi; Guorong Li; Kristin M Perkumas; Ruiyi Ren; Haiyan Gong; W Daniel Stamer; Mark Johnson; Evan A Scott Journal: ACS Appl Mater Interfaces Date: 2021-07-07 Impact factor: 10.383