PURPOSE: To evaluate the effect of long-term chloroquine intake on the multifocal electroretinogram (mfERG) in female patients with and without maculopathy. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of the mfERGs recorded in three different groups: (1) patients with bilateral maculopathy having taken chloroquine, (2) patients without maculopathy having taken chloroquine, and (3) healthy control subjects (age-matched to group 2) who never took chloroquine. MfERGs of each group were averaged, and the data of each patient group were compared to the control group. The main outcome measures were N1 and P1 characteristics and the ring ratio analysis. RESULTS: In group 1, 11 female subjects (22 eyes) were included, group 2 consisted of nine patients (18 eyes) and group 3 of seven healthy female subjects (14 eyes). Compared with healthy controls, patients in group 1 showed significantly reduced response densities of both N1 and P1 across all ring eccentricities except ring 5. Implicit times were significantly delayed only concerning N1 (ring 4 and the sum response of the left eye of group 1). P1 implicit times showed no significant alterations in either group. Ring ratios of the response densities were significantly higher mainly concerning group 1 (N1: ring 5/ring 2 and ring 5/ring 4 of the right eye; P1: all ring ratios of the right eye and all ratios except ring 5/ring 1 and ring 5/ring 4 of the left eye). The only ring ratio being significantly higher in group 2 was P1 ring 5/ring 1 ratio of the right eye. CONCLUSIONS: In the absence of clinically apparent maculopathy, chloroquine intake was not associated with major alterations of the mfERG.
PURPOSE: To evaluate the effect of long-term chloroquine intake on the multifocal electroretinogram (mfERG) in female patients with and without maculopathy. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of the mfERGs recorded in three different groups: (1) patients with bilateral maculopathy having taken chloroquine, (2) patients without maculopathy having taken chloroquine, and (3) healthy control subjects (age-matched to group 2) who never took chloroquine. MfERGs of each group were averaged, and the data of each patient group were compared to the control group. The main outcome measures were N1 and P1 characteristics and the ring ratio analysis. RESULTS: In group 1, 11 female subjects (22 eyes) were included, group 2 consisted of nine patients (18 eyes) and group 3 of seven healthy female subjects (14 eyes). Compared with healthy controls, patients in group 1 showed significantly reduced response densities of both N1 and P1 across all ring eccentricities except ring 5. Implicit times were significantly delayed only concerning N1 (ring 4 and the sum response of the left eye of group 1). P1 implicit times showed no significant alterations in either group. Ring ratios of the response densities were significantly higher mainly concerning group 1 (N1: ring 5/ring 2 and ring 5/ring 4 of the right eye; P1: all ring ratios of the right eye and all ratios except ring 5/ring 1 and ring 5/ring 4 of the left eye). The only ring ratio being significantly higher in group 2 was P1 ring 5/ring 1 ratio of the right eye. CONCLUSIONS: In the absence of clinically apparent maculopathy, chloroquine intake was not associated with major alterations of the mfERG.
Authors: Donald C Hood; Michael Bach; Mitchell Brigell; David Keating; Mineo Kondo; Jonathan S Lyons; Michael F Marmor; Daphne L McCulloch; Anja M Palmowski-Wolfe Journal: Doc Ophthalmol Date: 2011-10-30 Impact factor: 2.379
Authors: Michael F Marmor; Ulrich Kellner; Timothy Y Y Lai; Jonathan S Lyons; William F Mieler Journal: Ophthalmology Date: 2011-02 Impact factor: 12.079
Authors: Marija S Trenkic Božinovic; Gordana Stankovic Babic; Maja Petrovic; Jelena Karadžic; Tatjana Šarenac Vulovic; Milan Trenkic Journal: J Res Med Sci Date: 2019-06-25 Impact factor: 1.852