Erwan Pansard1, Shahnaz Klouche2, Glen Vardi3, Eugene Greeff3, Philippe Hardy2, Mark Ferguson3. 1. Rosebank Clinic, Center for Sport Medicine and Orthopaedic Surgery, Johannesburg, South Africa; Hôpitaux Universitaires Paris Ile-de-France Ouest, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Boulogne-Billancourt, France; Université de Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines, Versailles, France. Electronic address: erwan.pansard@gmail.com. 2. Hôpitaux Universitaires Paris Ile-de-France Ouest, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Boulogne-Billancourt, France; Université de Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines, Versailles, France. 3. Rosebank Clinic, Center for Sport Medicine and Orthopaedic Surgery, Johannesburg, South Africa.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To assess the ability of 2 independent surgical techniques, an inside-out technique and an outside-in technique, using bony landmarks on the femoral wall, to place the anterior cruciate ligament graft anatomically. METHODS: A retrospective single-center study was conducted in 2012 and included patients who underwent anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Two techniques were used: The lateral condylar wall was visualized from the anterolateral portal and tunnels were drilled "outside-in" in one group, whereas viewing was performed from the anteromedial portal and retrograde drilling ("inside-out") was performed in the other group. The primary outcome measure was the placement of the tunnel center point on postoperative computed tomography scans with 3-dimensional reconstruction, according to the radiographic quadrant method of Bernard and Hertel. The measurements were compared with optimal placements according to Bird et al. Their reliability was assessed with Spearman (rho) and intraclass correlation coefficients. RESULTS: Forty patients were included, with 20 in each group; the mean age was 29.8 ± 9.6 years, and there were 33 men and 7 women. The interobserver reliability and intraobserver reliability of measurements were good, with a Spearman ρ between 0.46 (P = .002) and 0.93 (P < .001) and an intraclass correlation coefficient between 0.44 (P = .001) and 0.86 (P < .001). The femoral tunnel positions of both techniques were close to the previously published anatomic placements, but there was a significant difference between our results and the theoretical position in proximal-distal measurements (P = .01). There was no difference in the anteroposterior measurements. There was no statistical difference in the accuracy of placement of the femoral tunnel center point between these 2 independent techniques. CONCLUSIONS: The direct arthroscopic visualization of bony landmarks seems sufficient for accurate positioning of the femoral tunnel whatever the drilling technique. This finding is clinically relevant because the routine use of direct measurement techniques or intraoperative radiographs may not be necessary to obtain anatomic tunnel placement. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, case series.
PURPOSE: To assess the ability of 2 independent surgical techniques, an inside-out technique and an outside-in technique, using bony landmarks on the femoral wall, to place the anterior cruciate ligament graft anatomically. METHODS: A retrospective single-center study was conducted in 2012 and included patients who underwent anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Two techniques were used: The lateral condylar wall was visualized from the anterolateral portal and tunnels were drilled "outside-in" in one group, whereas viewing was performed from the anteromedial portal and retrograde drilling ("inside-out") was performed in the other group. The primary outcome measure was the placement of the tunnel center point on postoperative computed tomography scans with 3-dimensional reconstruction, according to the radiographic quadrant method of Bernard and Hertel. The measurements were compared with optimal placements according to Bird et al. Their reliability was assessed with Spearman (rho) and intraclass correlation coefficients. RESULTS: Forty patients were included, with 20 in each group; the mean age was 29.8 ± 9.6 years, and there were 33 men and 7 women. The interobserver reliability and intraobserver reliability of measurements were good, with a Spearman ρ between 0.46 (P = .002) and 0.93 (P < .001) and an intraclass correlation coefficient between 0.44 (P = .001) and 0.86 (P < .001). The femoral tunnel positions of both techniques were close to the previously published anatomic placements, but there was a significant difference between our results and the theoretical position in proximal-distal measurements (P = .01). There was no difference in the anteroposterior measurements. There was no statistical difference in the accuracy of placement of the femoral tunnel center point between these 2 independent techniques. CONCLUSIONS: The direct arthroscopic visualization of bony landmarks seems sufficient for accurate positioning of the femoral tunnel whatever the drilling technique. This finding is clinically relevant because the routine use of direct measurement techniques or intraoperative radiographs may not be necessary to obtain anatomic tunnel placement. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, case series.