Literature DB >> 25636909

Dynamic maximum urethral closure pressures measured by high-resolution manometry increase markedly after sling surgery.

Anna C Kirby1, Jasmine Tan-Kim, Charles W Nager.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: The premise of midurethral sling (MUS) surgery is to apply a tension-free vaginal tape in the midurethra that does not constrict the urethra at rest but stabilizes the urethra and prevents downward descent and opening of the urethra during stress maneuvers, but current technology has limitations in measuring urethral pressures during dynamic conditions. Our objective was to describe the change in maximum urethral closure pressures (MUCPs) after MUS surgery using an 8F high-resolution manometry (HRM) system that can measure urethral pressures during cough and strain maneuvers (ManoScan® ESO; Covidien) without migration or withdrawal limitations.
METHODS: We measured rest, cough, and strain MUCPs in 26 women before and after retropubic or transobturator MUS for stress urinary incontinence using the HRM system.
RESULTS: The objective success rate after MUS was 92.3 % based on postoperative cough stress testing. Mean resting MUCPs measured by HRM did not change after surgery (59.3 before vs. 59.7 cm H2O after surgery; p = 1.0). Mean cough MUCPs measured by HRM increased from 36.9 to 100.7 cm H2O (p < 0.001), and strain MUCPs increased from 35.0 to 92.7 cm H2O (p < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: Advanced HRM technology to measure MUCPs under cough and strain conditions without withdrawal techniques provides new insights into the continence mechanism after tension-free MUS: MUCPs do not change at rest but do increase significantly during cough and strain maneuvers.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25636909      PMCID: PMC6719307          DOI: 10.1007/s00192-014-2622-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Urogynecol J        ISSN: 0937-3462            Impact factor:   2.894


  15 in total

1.  Measurement of dynamic urethral pressures with a high-resolution manometry system in continent and incontinent women.

Authors:  Anna C Kirby; Jasmine Tan-Kim; Charles W Nager
Journal:  Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg       Date:  2015 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.091

2.  Long-term results of the tension-free vaginal tape (TVT) procedure for surgical treatment of female stress urinary incontinence.

Authors:  C G Nilsson; N Kuuva; C Falconer; M Rezapour; U Ulmsten
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  2001

3.  Effect of tension-free vaginal tape procedure on urodynamic continence indices.

Authors:  N Mutone; M Mastropietro; E Brizendine; D Hale
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 7.661

4.  A severity index for epidemiological surveys of female urinary incontinence: comparison with 48-hour pad-weighing tests.

Authors:  H Sandvik; A Seim; A Vanvik; S Hunskaar
Journal:  Neurourol Urodyn       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 2.696

5.  Surgery versus physiotherapy for stress urinary incontinence.

Authors:  Julien Labrie; Bary L C M Berghmans; Kathelijn Fischer; Alfredo L Milani; Ileana van der Wijk; Dina J C Smalbraak; Astrid Vollebregt; René P Schellart; Giuseppe C M Graziosi; J Marinus van der Ploeg; Joseph F G M Brouns; E Stella M Tiersma; Annette G Groenendijk; Piet Scholten; Ben Willem Mol; Elisabeth E Blokhuis; Albert H Adriaanse; Aaltje Schram; Jan-Paul W R Roovers; Antoine L M Lagro-Janssen; Carl H van der Vaart
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2013-09-19       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 6.  An International Urogynecological Association (IUGA)/International Continence Society (ICS) joint report on the terminology for female pelvic floor dysfunction.

Authors:  Bernard T Haylen; Dirk de Ridder; Robert M Freeman; Steven E Swift; Bary Berghmans; Joseph Lee; Ash Monga; Eckhard Petri; Diaa E Rizk; Peter K Sand; Gabriel N Schaer
Journal:  Neurourol Urodyn       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 2.696

Review 7.  Oesophageal high-resolution manometry: moving from research into clinical practice.

Authors:  M R Fox; A J Bredenoord
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2007-09-25       Impact factor: 23.059

8.  Dynamic urethral pressure profilometry pressure transmission ratio: what do the numbers really mean?

Authors:  B A Rosenzweig; N N Bhatia; A L Nelson
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1991-04       Impact factor: 7.661

9.  Short forms to assess life quality and symptom distress for urinary incontinence in women: the Incontinence Impact Questionnaire and the Urogenital Distress Inventory. Continence Program for Women Research Group.

Authors:  J S Uebersax; J F Wyman; S A Shumaker; D K McClish; J A Fantl
Journal:  Neurourol Urodyn       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 2.696

10.  Urethral sleeve sensor: a non-withdrawal method to measure maximum urethral pressure.

Authors:  Jasmine Tan-Kim; Milena M Weinstein; Charles W Nager
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2010-01-14       Impact factor: 2.894

View more
  4 in total

1.  The female continence mechanism measured by high resolution manometry: Urethral bulking versus midurethral sling.

Authors:  Erika J Wasenda; Anna C Kirby; Emily S Lukacz; Charles W Nager
Journal:  Neurourol Urodyn       Date:  2018-02-21       Impact factor: 2.696

2.  Analysis of continence reflexes by dynamic urethral pressure recordings in a rat stress urinary incontinence model induced by multiple simulated birth traumas.

Authors:  Joonbeom Kwon; Takahisa Suzuki; Ei-Ichiro Takaoka; Nobutaka Shimizu; Takahiro Shimizu; Shun Takai; Satoru Yoshikawa; William C de Groat; Naoki Yoshimura
Journal:  Am J Physiol Renal Physiol       Date:  2019-07-17

3.  Preclinical applications of high-definition manometry system to investigate pelvic floor muscle contribution to continence mechanisms in a rabbit model.

Authors:  Samuel Sorkhi; Youngjin Seo; Valmik Bhargava; Mahadevan Raj Rajasekaran
Journal:  Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol       Date:  2021-12-08       Impact factor: 4.052

4.  Do Women Who Self-report More Exercise Have Increased Rates of Symptomatic Stress Urinary Incontinence After Midurethral Slings?

Authors:  Kimberly L Ferrante; Marie G Gantz; Amaanti Sridhar; Ariana Smith; David D Rahn; David R Ellington; Alison C Weidner; Kyle Wohlrab; Donna Mazloomdoost; Pamela Moalli; Emily S Lukacz
Journal:  Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg       Date:  2021-01-01       Impact factor: 1.913

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.