Literature DB >> 25636715

Long-term risk of aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage after a negative aneurysm screen.

Ingeborg Rasing1, Ynte M Ruigrok2, Paut Greebe1, Birgitta K Velthuis1, Theo D Witkamp1, Marieke J H Wermer1, Yvo B Roos1, W Peter Vandertop1, Gabriel J E Rinkel1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The objective was to assess the risk of aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH) in the initial 15 years after negative aneurysm screening in persons with one first-degree relative with aSAH.
METHODS: From a cohort of first-degree relatives of patients with aSAH who underwent screening between 1995 and 1997 (n = 626), we included those with a negative screening (n = 601). We retrieved all causes of death and sent a questionnaire to screenees who were still alive. If aSAH was reported, we reviewed all medical data. We assessed the incidence of aSAH in this cohort with survival analysis and calculated an incidence ratio by dividing the observed incidence with the age- and sex-adjusted incidence in the general population.
RESULTS: Of the 601 screenees, 3 had aSAH during 8,938 follow-up patient-years (mean 14.9 years). After 15 years, the cumulative incidence was 0.50% (95% confidence interval: 0.00%-1.06%) with an incidence rate of 33.6 per 100,000 person-years; the incidence rate ratio was 1.7 (95% confidence interval: 0.3-5.7).
CONCLUSIONS: In the first 15 years after a negative screening, the risk of aSAH in persons with one first-degree relative with aSAH is not nil, but in the range of that in the general population, or even higher. Whether this finding justifies serial aneurysm screening in this population requires further study.
© 2015 American Academy of Neurology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25636715      PMCID: PMC4351666          DOI: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000001310

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurology        ISSN: 0028-3878            Impact factor:   9.910


  10 in total

Review 1.  Decision analysis to complete diagnostic research by closing the gap between test characteristics and cost-effectiveness.

Authors:  Joanna D Schaafsma; Yolanda van der Graaf; Gabriel J E Rinkel; Erik Buskens
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2009-04-11       Impact factor: 6.437

2.  Familial intracranial aneurysms.

Authors:  A Ronkainen; J Hernesniemi; M Puranen; L Niemitukia; R Vanninen; M Ryynänen; H Kuivaniemi; G Tromp
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1997-02-08       Impact factor: 79.321

3.  Long-term, serial screening for intracranial aneurysms in individuals with a family history of aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage: a cohort study.

Authors:  A Stijntje E Bor; Gabriel J E Rinkel; Jeroen van Norden; Marieke J H Wermer
Journal:  Lancet Neurol       Date:  2014-03-05       Impact factor: 44.182

4.  Risks and benefits of screening for intracranial aneurysms in first-degree relatives of patients with sporadic subarachnoid hemorrhage.

Authors: 
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1999-10-28       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Optimal screening strategy for familial intracranial aneurysms: a cost-effectiveness analysis.

Authors:  A Stijntje E Bor; Hendrik Koffijberg; Marieke J H Wermer; Gabriel J E Rinkel
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2010-05-25       Impact factor: 9.910

Review 6.  Incidence of subarachnoid haemorrhage: a systematic review with emphasis on region, age, gender and time trends.

Authors:  N K de Rooij; F H H Linn; J A van der Plas; A Algra; G J E Rinkel
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  2007-04-30       Impact factor: 10.154

7.  Risk of subarachnoid haemorrhage according to number of affected relatives: a population based case-control study.

Authors:  A S E Bor; G J E Rinkel; J Adami; H Koffijberg; A Ekbom; E Buskens; P Blomqvist; F Granath
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2008-09-26       Impact factor: 13.501

8.  Initial and follow-up screening for aneurysms in families with familial subarachnoid hemorrhage.

Authors:  T W Raaymakers; G J Rinkel; L M Ramos
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 9.910

9.  Greater rupture risk for familial as compared to sporadic unruptured intracranial aneurysms.

Authors:  Joseph P Broderick; Robert D Brown; Laura Sauerbeck; Richard Hornung; John Huston; Daniel Woo; Craig Anderson; Guy Rouleau; Dawn Kleindorfer; Matthew L Flaherty; Irene Meissner; Tatiana Foroud; E Charles J Moomaw; E Sander Connolly
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2009-02-19       Impact factor: 7.914

10.  Repeated screening for intracranial aneurysms in familial subarachnoid hemorrhage.

Authors:  Marieke J H Wermer; Gabriël J E Rinkel; Jan van Gijn
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2003-11-06       Impact factor: 7.914

  10 in total
  2 in total

1.  A cost-effectiveness analysis of screening for intracranial aneurysms in persons with one first-degree relative with subarachnoid haemorrhage.

Authors:  Esther M Hopmans; Ynte M Ruigrok; Anne Se Bor; Gabriel Je Rinkel; Hendrik Koffijberg
Journal:  Eur Stroke J       Date:  2016-10-19

Review 2.  Preventive screening for intracranial aneurysms.

Authors:  Gabriel Je Rinkel; Ynte M Ruigrok
Journal:  Int J Stroke       Date:  2021-06-17       Impact factor: 5.266

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.