Alexander J Saxby1, Claire Gowdy2, Marcela Fandiño3, Neil K Chadha4, Frederick K Kozak5, Michael A Sargent6, Jane Lea7. 1. Division of Pediatric Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, BC Children's Hospital, 4480 Oak Street, Vancouver, BC V6H 3N1, Canada. Electronic address: saxbyaj@gmail.com. 2. Department of Radiology, BC Children's Hospital, 4480 Oak Street, Vancouver, BC V6H 3N1, Canada. Electronic address: claire.gowdy@cw.bc.ca. 3. Division of Pediatric Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, BC Children's Hospital, 4480 Oak Street, Vancouver, BC V6H 3N1, Canada. Electronic address: fandino.marcela@gmail.com. 4. Division of Pediatric Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, BC Children's Hospital, 4480 Oak Street, Vancouver, BC V6H 3N1, Canada. Electronic address: nchadha@cw.bc.ca. 5. Division of Pediatric Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, BC Children's Hospital, 4480 Oak Street, Vancouver, BC V6H 3N1, Canada. Electronic address: fkozak@cw.bc.ca. 6. Department of Radiology, BC Children's Hospital, 4480 Oak Street, Vancouver, BC V6H 3N1, Canada. Electronic address: msargent@cw.bc.ca. 7. Division of Pediatric Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, BC Children's Hospital, 4480 Oak Street, Vancouver, BC V6H 3N1, Canada. Electronic address: jlea@cw.bc.ca.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Establishing the prevalence of semicircular canal dehiscence in a pediatric population using temporal bone CT imaging. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective analysis of all temporal bone CT scans during a 5-year period (2007-2012). METHODS: CT scan images were reformatted in the plane of the canals and assessed by two independent reviewers with a third to resolve disagreement. Detailed chart review was performed for those found to have dehiscence. Superior and posterior canals were classified as "dehiscent", "possibly dehiscent", "thin" or "normal" for each case. RESULTS: 649 temporal bones were assessed from 334 children (under 18 years of age). The prevalence rate of superior canal dehiscence (SCD) was 1.7% (3.3% of individuals). Posterior canal dehiscence (PCD) was present in 1.2% (2.1% of individuals). There were no cases of bilateral SCD, and one case of bilateral PCD. Age under 3 years was associated with a higher prevalence of thinning but not dehiscence. Congenital inner ear malformation was not related to a higher probability of dehiscence. The superior petrosal sinus was associated with the SCD in three cases (27.3%). Retrospective chart review highlighted possible vestibular symptoms in 3/11 patients with SCD (27.3%). CONCLUSIONS: This forms the largest pediatric study of canal dehiscence to date. This study's prevalence rate is significantly lower than previous reports. The identified association with overlying venous structures may reflect the etiological process involved. The occurrence in children supports the hypothesis of a congenital predisposition for development of canal dehiscence syndrome.
OBJECTIVE: Establishing the prevalence of semicircular canal dehiscence in a pediatric population using temporal bone CT imaging. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective analysis of all temporal bone CT scans during a 5-year period (2007-2012). METHODS: CT scan images were reformatted in the plane of the canals and assessed by two independent reviewers with a third to resolve disagreement. Detailed chart review was performed for those found to have dehiscence. Superior and posterior canals were classified as "dehiscent", "possibly dehiscent", "thin" or "normal" for each case. RESULTS: 649 temporal bones were assessed from 334 children (under 18 years of age). The prevalence rate of superior canal dehiscence (SCD) was 1.7% (3.3% of individuals). Posterior canal dehiscence (PCD) was present in 1.2% (2.1% of individuals). There were no cases of bilateral SCD, and one case of bilateral PCD. Age under 3 years was associated with a higher prevalence of thinning but not dehiscence. Congenital inner ear malformation was not related to a higher probability of dehiscence. The superior petrosal sinus was associated with the SCD in three cases (27.3%). Retrospective chart review highlighted possible vestibular symptoms in 3/11 patients with SCD (27.3%). CONCLUSIONS: This forms the largest pediatric study of canal dehiscence to date. This study's prevalence rate is significantly lower than previous reports. The identified association with overlying venous structures may reflect the etiological process involved. The occurrence in children supports the hypothesis of a congenital predisposition for development of canal dehiscence syndrome.